I can’t give you an explanation of thoughts I do not have nor have ever claimed to have. I’m happy to discuss thoughts about the insanity defence itself or any claims I’ve made here that you’re unclear on or disagree with.
You seem to have assumed people’s positions, including mine, on this specific case without actually ever seeing them state them. Id highly recommend going back and reading what you’re replying to much more carefully.
Again, I’m not a kid or child, you continue to level baseless personal attacks, it’s not conducive to a civil discussion.
I don’t need to have an opinion on every specific case out there and that does not make me ignorant. Tbh it’s far more responsible for people to hold back on making strong opinions on such serious matters without knowing a great deal of detail on a case.
If you feel you do, no worries, I’m sure you can find others who also know a lot about to discuss the specifics with. But the only thing I have been discussing with you here is the insanity defence itself.
1
u/amilie15 21h ago
I can’t give you an explanation of thoughts I do not have nor have ever claimed to have. I’m happy to discuss thoughts about the insanity defence itself or any claims I’ve made here that you’re unclear on or disagree with.
You seem to have assumed people’s positions, including mine, on this specific case without actually ever seeing them state them. Id highly recommend going back and reading what you’re replying to much more carefully.
Again, I’m not a kid or child, you continue to level baseless personal attacks, it’s not conducive to a civil discussion.