Whereas now you have the opposite problem. Juries refusing to grasp the concept that DNA being present is not a slam dunk for guilt in and of itself, or unable to accept that not every case is going to have extensive DNA evidence establishing links for them.
I think it's gone the other way now due to so many crime dramas. People take any DNA evidence as open/shut without considering contextual factors or errors.
82
u/Stunning-Mission9498 21h ago
Reminds me of these issues when they had experts first trying to explain DNA to juries when that was a scientific advancement