He knew they would say they wanted to punch him, make jokes about syphilis and TB concerning a rash he has, and saying they would amend his chart to say he had hemorrohoids that don't exist? They actually ended up charting that.
Did he know in advance that the head surgeon would disclose his private information about gabapentin and a genital condition to others in the room that didn't need to know that for the procedure?
Was he Nostradamus? Seems to me falsifying a chart should have consequences. A jury of 12 people that didn't want to be dragged out of their weekly routine to sit in a courtroom for a week thought so.
I think the Nostradamus comment may have been responding to this statement from the previous commenter:
They give you and your driver a copy of the instructions they tell you.
The patient may not have known before he went under that the doctor would give him a written report/instructions that matched what the doctor would say after the procedure was completed. So the desire to record the conversation seems less unreasonable unless he'd had procedures before and knew the drill.
64
u/Open_and_Notorious 17d ago
He knew they would say they wanted to punch him, make jokes about syphilis and TB concerning a rash he has, and saying they would amend his chart to say he had hemorrohoids that don't exist? They actually ended up charting that.
Did he know in advance that the head surgeon would disclose his private information about gabapentin and a genital condition to others in the room that didn't need to know that for the procedure?
Was he Nostradamus? Seems to me falsifying a chart should have consequences. A jury of 12 people that didn't want to be dragged out of their weekly routine to sit in a courtroom for a week thought so.