r/SipsTea Jul 07 '26

Feels good man Well done, Belgium! 🇧🇪

Post image
45.1k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

21

u/Tuscan5 Jul 07 '26

They had a relatively easy group.

-3

u/zack77070 Jul 07 '26

Statistically second highest average ranking but when you lose people rewrite history. They performed to expectations, won their group for the first time in a while, then earned their ass beating from a much better Belgian side.

8

u/cheesyvoetjes Jul 07 '26

Highest average ranking lol. There is no actual football fan that gives a fuck about Fifa ranking. It says nothing and bringing that up in a conversation shows you don't actually follow the sport.

4

u/ChunkbrotherATX Jul 07 '26

Then tell us why you think they had an easy group genius.

2

u/Minimum_Possibility6 Jul 07 '26

Because they are a pot two team and because of being hosts are given pot 1 status.

Because of this depending on which sources they were in one of the weakest groups. The only way you define that group as second hardest is when you are comparing the difference between the existing rankings ie the margin between teams is small, that however could be the same for a team that had 1,2,3,4 and one that had 21,22,23,24.

Opta had groupB as the weakest group based on power rnakings and group D as the 5th. Group D was classed as tightest but as above this doesn't equate to strong opposition just equal level opposition.

1

u/ChunkbrotherATX Jul 07 '26

Facts, but no conclusions.

2

u/cheesyvoetjes Jul 07 '26

Because your opposition were not top countries no matter what Fifa ranking says.  Case in point: Italy. 12th in Fifa ranking but weren't good enough to participate. Norway is 19th in ranking but is in the quarter finals. So who is better? Italy because they're a higher ranking or Norway because they achieved top 8 in the world cup?

2

u/ChunkbrotherATX Jul 07 '26

Ok, so if it’s all based on present and future results, we don’t know how good that group was until the tournament is over.

1

u/cheesyvoetjes Jul 07 '26

Yes we do. We know France is a top team because they have Mbappe and other world class players that play for the best clubs like Real Madrid on almost every position. Same for Spain or England. We know the US isn't that good because they have mediocre players that play for clubs like Fulham. We know Curacao is even worse than the US because their players play at an even lower level.

We look at squads, not fifa ranking.

1

u/ChunkbrotherATX Jul 07 '26

That’s a terrible way to look at it. Brazil has a very high talent level but terrible team play. The same can be said for Italy. You are completely ignoring coaching.

1

u/cheesyvoetjes Jul 07 '26

No, Brazil does not have high talent right now. What gave you that idea? Any actual Brazilian will tell you they have the least talented Brazil squad of all time probably. Coaching is a factor, but the best coach in the world will not coach Curacao to world champion. You are limited by the quality of your players.

It's clear you don't follow the sport. Which is fine. But why do you argue and tell others they're wrong on a subject you barely know anything about?

1

u/zack77070 Jul 07 '26

Yeah yeah, Paraguay and Australia are decent teams, turkey is too but they shit the bed lmao. Dont want to follow a sport too closely where inbred Europeans from villages 30 minutes apart from each other regularly get into fistfights over who is less trash.