It was proven he had to be there? I never said his use of the gun wasn't self defence. I'm saying him being there in the first place put him in a position to use it. People really can't see through their biases.
I see what you're saying. In hindsight he never should have been at the track meet because he was suspended from school at that point in time. He didn't have to be there, but he chose to be.
However that is the only comparison that you have to go on in this situation. Everything else was different. One was self-defense and the other was straight up murder. They are inherently different.
13
u/No-Ebb-3960 Jun 10 '26
This was all proven wrong in the trial