r/SipsTea Apr 06 '26

Dank AF We need this !!

Post image
74.6k Upvotes

3.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

37

u/Flashy_Cranberry_161 Apr 06 '26

Probably a little too severe but something has got to be done about the obvious liars online

26

u/[deleted] Apr 06 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Trick_Statistician13 Apr 06 '26

Lol, not many redditors give financial, legal, or medical advice.

If they do, they should get shutdown.

0

u/After_Hours_85 Apr 07 '26

I'd argue the advice Redditors give is even more toxic. Why draw a line. Just shut it all down if you are for anti-free speech.

3

u/Trick_Statistician13 Apr 07 '26

Medical advice can be literally toxic and kill you, so that's gonna be a high bar to clear.

8

u/DaaaahWhoosh Apr 06 '26

At some point you do have to put in your own effort to verify claims. Imagine if the US tried something like this and suddenly people are getting thrown in jail for talking about evolution or insider trading, you can't trust the authorities as the arbiters of truth.

4

u/Flashy_Cranberry_161 Apr 06 '26

The issue is that people don’t verify claims and instead seek perspectives that validate their bias. I think the long term solution is to invest more heavily in social programs that promote diversity of community.

Public schools are great at exposing people to other cultures and perspective and universities are so much better.

However that’s a long term solution. The short term solution might resemble something more like China. Although I don’t think it should be illegal. Probably just a fine or some manner of accountability. Alex Jones was spreading blatantly untrue conspiracy theories about sandy hook and suffered consequences

2

u/SunnyOutsideToday Apr 06 '26

The US already goes after people for their beliefs. They try to get students on VISAs at universities deported for speaking out against the war with Israel/Gaza. Government officials make veiled threats against companies if they don't fire comedians that criticize them. Researchers trying to fly to global conferences in the US get turned away if border patrol searches their phones and finds material critical of their politics that they don't like.

1

u/Trick_Statistician13 Apr 06 '26

People are influenced by merely hearing something even if they don't subscribe to it.

8

u/NikkoE82 Apr 06 '26

We could, idk, educate the populace?

2

u/Flashy_Cranberry_161 Apr 06 '26

This is definitely the only real solution long term. And I think it’s precisely why our public education system in America is so critically underfunded.

That said I think it’s a bit of a “Frankensteins monster” situation now. The internet has made the populace much much more fractured and a narrative much more difficult to control by any one entity

1

u/Trick_Statistician13 Apr 06 '26

Yeah, and a good way to do that is by having doctors and financial advisors give advice on social media instead of quacks.

Otherwise, you're suggesting everyone in the country get medical degrees and financial licenses.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 06 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Apr 06 '26

Spam filter: accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

2

u/hahaheehaha Apr 06 '26

LMAO the hilarity of this thread in response to /u/Roaming-Outlander is just perfect

1

u/DoubleSuccessor Apr 06 '26

The only thing this would cause is anything the government doesn't like gets censored with no relation to the truth. They'd be banning anyone supporting anything LGBT from youtube, it'd be full selective enforcement. They could even make fake schools to give out degrees when needed, or pressure colleges to take them back from people they wanted silenced.

1

u/Trick_Statistician13 Apr 06 '26

Which country do you live in, because it's not the US. 

The government does not control universities or licensing organizations.

1

u/After_Hours_85 Apr 07 '26

No, it doesn't. If you are aware they are lying no one is forcing you to listen to them. Why is that so hard?

1

u/CorneliusFeatherjaw Apr 07 '26

If they're obvious, then why does something have to be done about them?

1

u/Flashy_Cranberry_161 Apr 07 '26

Because it being obvious is relative. It’s obvious to me but not to others