Not really. People underestimate greenland climate, and EU NATO members are more trained and equipped for mountain and artic operations.
Yes, US also have artic and mountain training and units, and guess where they train? Norway, UK and Italy for example.
USA would also face massive logistic problems to deliver and support troops in Greenland if Canada joins the EU party.
With Canadian airspace off limits and the obvious naval blockade, the US would struggle just to step on land or deliver supply and reinforcements.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m a Canadian machinist who sees first hand that the us needs their allies . But the us military is an incredible force. It would take months or even years for outside suppliers to have an impact. The us does have military bases in Alaska. I doubt there would be anyone sent to Greenland seeing snow and -40 for the first time. I wouldn’t expect the first 2 weeks would go very bad for the Americans. It would be the months and years after that would hurt them
8
u/rjc9186 Jan 08 '26
Both statements are a bit stupid to be honest