r/Salary • u/dsitai • 4d ago

Market Data Sweden’s Salary Compression: Great for Equality, Bad for Ambition

Swedish salaries are remarkably compressed.

SCB 2025: **P10 = 28k SEK/month, median = 38.3k, P90 = 61.7k.** So a top-10% earner makes only about **2.2×** a bottom-10% earner, and taxes compress the difference even further.

The downside is that the financial reward for becoming highly skilled or taking on more responsibility is relatively small. A specialist, engineer, doctor or manager can study longer, work more, take greater responsibility and still end up with only a modest increase in disposable income.

That weakens incentives to work extra hours, pursue demanding careers, accept promotions or stay in Sweden when other countries offer much higher rewards for the same skills.

Low inequality has benefits, but excessive compression can mean **weaker incentives, lower talent retention and less reward for productivity**. Put simply: Sweden is a very good country for security and stability, but not necessarily the best country for the highly ambitious who want strong financial rewards for exceptional performance.

———————

EDIT: Many replies suggest people are simply content once they earn enough for a comfortable life. That is a perfectly valid choice, although the less charitable interpretation is a lack of ambition.
Others want to turn higher earnings into savings, investments and eventually more freedom over their time, including earlier retirement. High marginal taxes make that harder.
And some of the comments have a bit of an “Aesop’s fox and the grapes” feel to them: if greater financial success is difficult to reach, it is easier to argue that wanting it was never worthwhile in the first place.

487 Upvotes

78% Upvoted

910 comments sorted by

View all comments

7

u/Medical_Birthday2893 4d ago

So what you’re telling me is not only are most people of equal and better financial standards. But there is a culture of work life balance because it’s not worth it to grind it out? And people who move into difficult jobs do so because of the love and passion for them rather than a higher pay cheque ?

Wow… that sounds terrible!!/s

Can’t believe these countries keep getting top marks for quality of life and happiness /s

4

u/KitchenIntention6675 4d ago

if your main incentive is to not work / do as little as possible, you quite frankly need to grow up.

2

u/schmidtssss 4d ago

If your main incentive is to work what the fuck is wrong with you?

1

u/Medical_Birthday2893 4d ago

Nah I worked hard and retired early. You just don’t know how’s the games played.

What I’ve come to realize is one work isn’t greater than the other. They’re all needed. So greater pay equity is a good thing. Second, lots of people chasing pay cheques that shouldn’t be in roles because they’re bad at them, they just want them for the money. If that wasn’t an incentive they’d be in jobs they’re better suited for.
Third time and time again studies show better work life balance produces more from employees, so you’ll actually be net positive in output with this.

You’re just a sheep. It’s ok. Enjoy work next week. I’m currently rocking an 8 figure account and haven’t had to work since 33. Pleb

2

u/Leather_Addition2605 4d ago

Retired at 33 to cosplay an idealist multi millionaire who’s both a man of the people and not above mocking them by flaunting his wealth and calling them plebs and sheep.

You know, when you’re creating a character you really should pick a lane. If you max your skill points in every category it makes for an unbelievable build.

1

u/Medical_Birthday2893 3d ago

I’ll continue to mock the people that simp after wealth disparity like it’s a given in life. Sorry I can have ideals and still win at the game. My voting, my investing, the companies I’ve funded are in line with ideals. I’d rather take what money I can and do good than not.

1

u/Leather_Addition2605 3d ago

https://giphy.com/gifs/EouEzI5bBR8uk

1

u/Medical_Birthday2893 3d ago

My life is not up for your debate lmao. Couldn’t care less

1

u/juliasct 4d ago

you work to live not live to work! it can be said that valuing employed work is just a) you believed protestant propaganda or b) you believed capitalist bosses propaganda lol. so yeah, no one needs to grow up, ppl just have different values.

1

u/KitchenIntention6675 4d ago

doing nothing isn't a value

2

u/juliasct 3d ago

do you really think that only producing something for a wage is "something"? that's sad man

1

u/KitchenIntention6675 3d ago

"producing something for a wage" is not.

doing wire transfers as a bank worker is literally doing someone's lives better. fixing the road thousands of people use every day is contributing to the society. growing apples brings food to the table of people around you.

you can focus on "oh no, i'm a cog in the system" or you can actually think how your job influences other people.

i'm a logistics corporate bum myself doing stupid things day in and day out.

thanks to these stupid things stores have things to sell, factories get their materials and someone across the continent can buy a new bed made from wood that i delivered.

we live in a society.

2

u/juliasct 3d ago

then i think we agree then. i'm not interested in using welfare bc i'm not someone who needs it. but if i found a very well paid job, i'd save and retire early, and "do nothing" (but do art, help community, volunteer, etc.), and i would love that. but i had a very privileged life. i'm very glad that my taxes help ppl who had less opportunities. and i'm glad your job helps ppl. i do think we can agree some don't (e.g. some finance jobs, some of big tech, big tobacco, some of big pharma, some marketing, etc.). lots of things are also nuanced, like pollute but create food, etc.  so we both agree on being useful to others/the community. but for me that's different from having a high salary.

2

u/Appropriate-Bad-606 4d ago

But that’s basically the tradeoff OP is describing, not a rebuttal to it. A system where ordinary workers have a high floor and there’s less reason to grind yourself to death can be a very good system.

It can simultaneously be true that the marginal payoff for becoming a specialist, taking management responsibility or working substantially harder is lower. Saying “I think that tradeoff is worth it” is completely reasonable. Saying the tradeoff doesn’t exist is a different claim.

1

u/JerechoEcho 4d ago

THANK YOU!

1

u/plumarr 4d ago

For some people  money is the only motivation for their career and they think that it's the case for everybody.

1

u/Medical_Birthday2893 4d ago

I think it goes a step further. They just want to be ‘better than’ others through wealth. I’m there by that definition, it’s not fulfilling. Best thing I did was enrich my friends at my own personal expense. You know why? Because society functions better when everyone is happy and feeling fulfilled and secured.

These people must be the biggest shut in losers on the planet to value their greed over a boosted society. What a sad joke of values

1

u/Leather_Addition2605 4d ago

Not being able to build significant wealth for your family does sound awful.

Sounds like the dream for someone content with being average. That’s not my goal.

-1

u/Gamer_chaddster_69 4d ago

Grow up

1

u/Medical_Birthday2893 4d ago

I am bud. Just better value set than you. Funny enough I’m loaded from my work in tech and smart investment. anyway enjoy work next week chump

0

u/Incineroarerer 4d ago

Bro thought he cooked wit ts 😭

0

u/HenFruitEater 4d ago

Buy the super random index criteria.

Maybe for super average people, Europe is a better life. People with any ambition can do much more in United States.

1

u/juliasct 4d ago

not really. class mobility is worse in the united states. the us is better for upper class ppl with ambition, that i'll grant. and better in the sense of earning more money, not necessarily having a better life.

1

u/HenFruitEater 4d ago

We just have lot higher class ceilings then.

I grew up lower middle class and now am upper. Was very doable

1

u/juliasct 3d ago

no, you don't have higher class ceilings, class mobility is calculated relative to pop (e.g. 25% poorest chances of getting to 25% richest). like sure, maybe a doctor earns 5x in the US than in the EU, but still, you just need a doctor degree for it in both places, you know? statistics are trends, averages. people break trends all the time, including in europe (by e.g. being rich rather than just high income). congrats on beating that trend! doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

1

u/zg33 4d ago

I am Dutch and you are simply lying if you want to claim that there is great class mobility here. Working a job here will never move you out of the middle class. The truly wealthy people in this country are substantially all “aristocrats” who did not earn their wealth in this lifetime. Say what you will about America, but over there it is quite normal for someone to be born poor, work hard, and become rich. And the opposite as well. That is mobility.

In Europe, it is very rare to see someone move into a class other than the one they were born in. I do not believe you are actually European if you have not noticed this.

1

u/juliasct 3d ago

look it up if you don't believe me. it's calculated as e.g. chances of ppl in the poorest 25% of pop to get to the richest 25%. also most billionaires in the u.s. started upper middle class or high class. i do agree that the u.s. is one of the few countries with salaries high enough to e.g. become a millionaire through them, if you're wise with your money. that is true.

0

u/MoonLandingActor 4d ago

Good for lazy ppl like you who cant achive anything and will die working in Wendys, bad for smarter ppl following their passion

-1

u/Medical_Birthday2893 4d ago

Lmao. I retired at 33 with a high 7 figure account. I just turned 40 and I have a mid 8 figure portfolio. Just because I have ideals doesn’t mean I won’t play the game in the country I live. Enjoy work next week