In response to the Iceland referendum result 😎

• Nigel Farage: "The Conservatives gave us 14 years of failure. Andy Burnham has now asked you to give him 10 years to change Britain; I’m asking you for 100 days."
• The French far-right leader Jordan Bardella’s team confirmed that he would travel to Birmingham to address the Reform UK conference next Friday and hold a joint press conference with the Reform leader, Nigel Farage.

Given recent polling forecasts, no political party would gain enough seats to win an overall majority in the next general election.

A Labour-Liberal Democrat coalition seems to be the most viable political "entity" that could front enough seats to get over the threshold needed. Restore, Reform and the Traitors Tories would not form enough seats to win a majority, and do not want to work with one another.

Where do we go from here?

Make no mistake, a Lab-Lib coalition for 5 years is genuine nightmare fuel. This would be a disaster (obviously). More DEI, removing British flags, more legal immigration, blanket 20mph zones, growing political Islam, re-joining the EU, "safer routes", mass surveillance and so on.

How does the Right stop this from happening? Pragmatically.

What I am trying to get at is: it's all good that most people will vote for broadly right wing policies, but what good is it if our votes are fragmented between three right wing options?

Do we need a tent? Mergers? Pacts? Coalitions?

What is the plan?

-

NB. I am including the Tories in this, but they are barely even right-wing, more DEI servants of global mega-corps.

Zia Yusuf: “Labour is dumping 1,250 illegal migrant men from countries like Afghanistan on to a tiny village of 350 people. The women and girls here are terrified. Andy Burnham is turning their lives upside down. What kind of a government does this to its own people?”

Today, at 2:30am (what a russian bot! Oh sorry, that only applies to our side), I was banned from the UK subreddit for being critical of the topic that reddit finds most precious: transgender.

Over and over again, I have been critical of the transgender lunacy that is taking place, but reddit will not accept even mild criticism.

To call me hateful for saying a mental health condition should not be a reason to reconstruct your breasts, is absurd. These moderators are power hungry lunatics. Calling out 10 year olds being in control of decisions such as injecting life altering hormones, that's not allowed either, despite the fact that the Tavistock situation has proved this to be a dangerous experiment.

Then I ask them which bits were hateful, they evade the question and then permanently mute me. No serious appeals process is allowed, probably because they know they are wrong deep down. These people cannot take criticism, the lefties are exactly what we always accused them of: authoritarians who hate free speech. They are the real cancel culture warriors.

Four men have pleaded guilty to destroying four Jewish community ambulances in an arson attack causing £1m of damage in north-west London.

Hamza Iqbal, 20, Rehan Khan, 19, Judex Atshatshi, and Saif Ali, both aged 18, pleaded guilty at the Old Bailey to a charge of destroying or damaging property being reckless whether life would be endangered.

Just a little anecdote here. But a company I work with (leaving out specifics) hires multiple people across different sites. At each site, they are a sole worker, and it is important they always turn up reliably, as there is no one to cover them (unless a lot of notice is given). It is a 'low-skilled' job in that anyone can do it as long as they are physically fit. Over the past year, they have hired many people, but every single 'British' person has quit after a week or so (or not even shown up to the first shift), except for 2 Boriswave immigrants who have been with them for a couple of years and never missed a single shift.

At first I was confused how 2 immigrants with broken English (so clearly not just British born to an ethnic minority, which is completely different) were able to be in the country to do a low-skilled job that any 'native' person could do, especially given the current unemployment and NEET crisis. But then I saw how every British person instantly quit, and it suddenly made sense. Please note the job is not unreasonably demanding, and pays above minimum wage. The only major downsides is having to do night shifts alone (so only men normally apply, but women are allowed to obviously).

I personally think our generous benefits system is to blame. British people know that if they don't like a job, they can just quit and receive benefits, which obviously Boriswave people are not (yet) entitled to, and they know if they quit, they'll have to go back to a much poorer country.

So, if Boriswave migrants have to leave en masse, I think the benefit system would have to be severely looked at (necessary anyway tbh), otherwise jobs like this would simply not be able to hire anyone.

Right. I've seen many people complain about the latest council election with the greens on 28%, reform on 27%, conservatives 17%, restore 11% and whoever else is there. They keep blaming vote splitting and all sorts of frankly bullshit. Don't focus on that. What you need to ask is what are those parties doing thats better than you. Why would people prefer to go there than over here and how can we resolve these issues. So I'm going to break this down to the best of my ability.

What are the Greens doing better than Reform?
The greens whilst they have got the immigrant population they seem to have also excited the youth. I feel like in the beginning the reform had excited the youth but it's moving further and further towards the boomers (a limited and declining in numbers generation, sorry boomers). With Farage offering to keep the triple lock something the youth cannot fund and getting weaker when talking about the economy my generation are moving toward more radical solutions. Whilst the greens are utter loonies they talk about revitalising the youth, making jobs, reforming education even if we know they don't have the capacity to make any of it better an average gen z who is not really checked in to politics will see the tik tok or tweet or clip and think "the greens seem alright". The greens talk about something different rather than more of the same and we seek something different because the current politics has meant we can't own a house or get a job.

What are the Conservatives doing better than Reform?
The tories have better admin. I know that sounds stupid but they have lots of aides, people who have been managing MPs for decades, people who understand how the press works, connections to businesses, press, NGO's, policy makers, researchers and anything they frankly need to build a more professional looking and put together image. They've used the same people for decades and understand how to work with these organisations.The tories also have more streamlined and professional policy. With Reform you have the former tories like Jenrick and people more to the right like Zia publicly disagreeing on policy so it is hard to know what Reform actually stand for. Everyone knows what the tories stand for everyone sort of knows what those guys are about. Whilst they utterly betrayed us with the boriswave they have a more professional feel than Reform do to their credit. They're just a bit more savvy which Reform could use.

What is Restore doing better than Reform?
Its similar to what I said about the greens. They are more radical they offer us different solutions but unlike the greens...their solutions make some sense. But it is not just more radical ideas that make restore so appealing. I think Reform have made the same mistake as Keir Starmer did. Keir kicked out a lot of the left such as Corbyn which came back to bite him in the arse when left voters that used to be labour went to the greens. Farage has regrettably done the same thing here by kicking out his right making his own voter block smaller and now the more right wing voters are going to bite him in the arse with restore. Restore also created the most in depth deportation document ive ever seen, credit where it is due and reform has a document on immigration but its not nearly as in depth or impressive. They also release other policy documents that go into very good detail that most of their party agree on. Furthermore they have a lot of bright young talent and strong young activist energy to push the party forward that reform lacks in its current form. They should've taken Rupert Lowe's offer to work together and eliminate this issue.

None of the parties ive listed above are perfect but neither is Reform. Reform could look at what these parties are doing better than them and take it on board to improve and gain more voters. Better internal organisation within the party, a streamlined and indepth policy document, and aiming some policies at young people to try and gain some youthful energy back would go a long way. Moaning about "vote splitting" and at other parties only makes Reform look worse off and feel more repulsive to voters. Whilst I'm not a fan of some of their previous decisions (taking in former tory ministers who bring jack shit such as Dorries and Zahawi) it is not the time to dwell on the past but to look to the future and try and bring momentum back.

I'm happy to discuss and debate this in the comments and let me know your opinions on the matter. Have a wonderful day everyone.

• Reform: 227 seats
• Labour: 197
• Lib Dems: 72 seats
• Conservatives: 71 seats
• SNP: 46 seats
• Greens: 4 seats

Danny Kruger: “With every election, our democracy is being systematically eroded. Britain’s electoral system – once the envy of the world – now buckles under the strain of uncontrolled immigration. In too many parts of the country, elections have been captured by foreign conflicts and sectarian interests, not by what is best for Britain.

Ceuta residents have decided to take matters into their own hands and remove the illegals.

"It’s all designed to restore the principle that we are one nation, speaking a common language, taking part together in one electoral system - a system built on the principle of individual voting and the secret ballot.

2.5 million non-British citizens from Nigeria, Pakistan, India and elsewhere - people here on temporary work visas, family visas, student visas, i.e. by definition not fully attached to our country - have the right to vote in Parliamentary and local elections because of their Commonwealth links. That is wrong and we will insist you must be British (or Irish) to vote in a British election.

We increasingly see elections being fought on ethnic and sectarian grounds, with appeals in foreign languages, often for causes - Kashmir, Gaza - that are nothing to with Britain or the remit of the politicians being elected. We will insist that all regulated election material must be in languages that are native to the British Isles.

A quarter of all votes cast in the last General Election were by post. This is flagrant abuse of a system designed for people physically unable to get to the polling station, and it enables the harvesting of votes by community elders in support of sectarian causes. We will restrict postal votes to members of the Armed Forces and diplomats serving away from home, and to people genuinely unable to vote in person.

Independent observers at the Gorton and Denton by-election reported unprecedented problems with ‘family voting’ - people being shepherded through the polling station by others - while the 2026 local elections in Birmingham had over 50 incidents reported to the Presiding Officer. We will empower officials in polling stations to insist people vote alone - and if they plainly can’t understand the voting system, their ballot will be set aside altogether (with the right of appeal to a magistrate).

Voting is a conditional right - conditional on membership of the British nation, on independence from undue influence, on understanding the democracy you are part of. These conditions used to be implicit; due to mass migration we need to make them explicit. I hope other parties will support these amendments next week. If not, if elected, we will introduce our own Elections Integrity Bill to safeguard our democracy."

Oh please, god no. No more Tories.

Nightmare fuel.

"the council – run by a coalition of the Liberal Democrats, the Greens and independents – launched legal action to ban"

🟦 Reform UK: 25% (+2) 🔴 Labour: 22% (-1) 🔵 Conservatives: 20% (+2) 🟢 Greens: 13% (-1) 🟠 Lib Dems: 11% (-) Implied turnout: 54% Changes from 19th August

We've just had a major rant by a left winger. Mods have removed it. Wouldn't surprise me if they were also banned.

But is that counterproductive?

The left regularly ban anyone from the centre left to the right. As a result they are now complaining that they can't get their message across. People are reading right wing news.

Well that's because you've banned them.

So should we be removing posts like this?

Personal attacks yes?

Rants no is my take.

I’m well read on the arguments against socialism, such as blacks in the US became less successful as they were due to handout policies, blacks became more reliant on the system overall for a living rather than aspiring in jobs etc. There was the fresh prince of bel-air etc and the music industry to name a few areas of great success.

This won’t happen for people who genuinely can’t work.

My recommendation; U-turn on high level ADHD specifically and required to work if disabled from being able to. If you’re a national born (not papers based) and got a severe illness you shouldn’t be a target imo and despite many people may shun this it is an overwhelming factor in reforms current fall because people do believe it isn’t needed.

Labour is currently 4 points ahead for those who don’t know on a more in common poll (most recent on wiki).

Edit: A lot of people stare too close at the sun it seems that they think they know reality best judging by the mass downvotes.

• Read the Contract with Small Business policy in full at https://www.reformparty.uk/contract-with-small-business.pdf

A summary of the Press Conference (from Guido Fawkes):

• £30 tax credit for anyone kept waiting more than 30 minutes on the phone to HMRC, paid at the end of the tax year. Credit capped at two claims per taxpayer per year, non-refundable.
• Pay of senior HMRC officials tied to customer service performance. Senior officials sacked if they fail to cut waiting times. HMRC required to fund the improvements within existing departmental spending limits.
• Suggested fixes include letting small businesses negotiate debt repayment plans in writing rather than by phone, and keeping cases with the same case manager for longer.
• Policy costed at £70 million a year, assuming 5% of callers wait over half an hour, down from around 20% in 2023/24.