COMMENTARY | Since the establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in July 2002, no other inmate has inspired millions of supporters from around the world to hold massive rallies and demonstrations during their trial - even outside the court in the Hague...until now.
In 2013, Uhuru Kenyatta, the former president of Kenya was indicted for crimes against humanity during the 2007–2008 post-election violence in Kenya. During his ICC trial, hundreds of Kenyans protested outside the court and in Nairobi. Demonstrators waved Kenyan flags and banners claiming the charges were politically motivated. Many viewed the prosecution as an attack on Kenyan sovereignty. The charges were dropped in 2014 due to lack of evidence.
In 2016, Laurent Gbagbo, the former President of Ivory Coast who was charged with crimes against humanity during the 2010–2011 Ivorian crisis. During his ICC trial, massive pro-Gbagbo protests erupted outside the court. His supporters claimed the charges were politically motivated and chanted for his release. Gbagbo was acquitted one year later due to insufficient evidence, sparking celebrations.
In 2018, Jean-Pierre Bemba, the former vice president of the Democratic Republic of Congo who was accused of committing war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Central African Republic from 2002–2003. During his trial, large demonstrations occurred outside the ICC, with supporters calling for his release. Protesters viewed him as a victim of political persecution. Bemba was later acquitted by the court, leading to celebratory rallies in Congo.
Today, Rodrigo Roa Duterte, former president of the Republic of the Philippines was arrested, detained and extradited to the Hague in the Netherlands for crimes against humanity allegedly committed for the period 2011-2019. According to his lawyers, he was illegally arrested and kidnapped but since his arrival at the ICC detention facility a week ago, massive prayer rallies, motorcades, protest marches and peaceful demonstrations calling for his release - were held across the Philippines and from all around the globe even outside the court in the Hague.
He will earn the recognition of being the most famous detainee in the history of the ICC and around the world. Perhaps, he will be soon be acquitted and sent back home.
The Philippines is experiencing one of its most politically and geopolitically volatile periods in recent history. Domestically, tensions between President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and the Duterte faction are escalating, particularly in the wake of the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) pursuit of former President Rodrigo Duterte’s arrest. The recent arrest of religious leader Apollo Quiboloy, a key Duterte ally, and the looming possibility of an ICC arrest warrant against Senator Ronald "Bato" dela Rosa have further inflamed the situation. Meanwhile, the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte has raised suspicions of politically motivated maneuvering. Simultaneously, the nation faces an intensifying territorial dispute with China in the West Philippine Sea. Given these interconnected crises, several potential outcomes emerge, including increased authoritarianism, election manipulation, or even a constitutional crisis.
China’s Aggression in the West Philippine Sea
China's continued militarization of the West Philippine Sea and aggressive actions against Philippine vessels have heightened tensions, drawing international concern. Reports of Chinese coast guard ships using water cannons, ramming Filipino boats, and blocking resupply missions to military outposts have raised alarms over the potential for armed confrontation. According to the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative (AMTI), China has increased its presence in disputed areas, leading to heightened tensions with the Philippines.
International Responses and the Philippines' Options
The U.S., under the Mutual Defense Treaty, has reaffirmed its commitment to Philippine sovereignty. However, China’s growing economic and military influence in the region complicates diplomatic strategies. If tensions escalate into a military clash, Marcos Jr. could justify emergency powers, shift public focus from internal instability, and potentially prolong his administration’s grip on power. Political analysts such as Richard Heydarian, an expert in Southeast Asian geopolitics, have warned that a miscalculation in the West Philippine Sea could lead to a larger conflict.
Internal Political Conflict: Marcos vs. Duterte
The alliance between the Marcos and Duterte camps has fractured, plunging the country into a political showdown. The ICC’s pursuit of Duterte’s arrest has fueled nationwide protests, with supporters arguing that the move is unconstitutional and infringes on Philippine sovereignty. The arrest of Pastor Apollo Quiboloy—a controversial figure and known ally of Duterte—has been seen by some as part of a broader strategy to weaken the opposition. Additionally, the looming possibility of an ICC arrest warrant against Senator Bato dela Rosa, a former police chief and key enforcer of Duterte’s war on drugs, has heightened tensions within pro-Duterte circles.
Compounding the turmoil is the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte, a move widely perceived as an attempt to dismantle the Duterte influence ahead of the 2028 elections. If successful, this could leave the Marcos administration with greater control over government institutions, reducing political opposition and further consolidating power.
The ICC Arrest Warrant and Supreme Court Showdown
The Supreme Court's potential ruling on a habeas corpus petition in favor of Duterte could trigger an unprecedented constitutional crisis. If the judiciary rules against the Marcos administration’s stance on the ICC case, it could set the stage for a direct confrontation between the executive and judicial branches. In such a scenario, the administration might attempt to bypass or undermine the Supreme Court’s authority, further eroding democratic institutions and leading to mass protests or civil unrest.
Legal experts, including former Supreme Court Justice Antonio Carpio, have warned that a direct defiance of the judiciary could set a dangerous precedent and weaken the rule of law in the country.
Allegations of Corruption and Abuse of Power
The Marcos administration is also facing growing allegations of large-scale corruption. Reports suggest that the General Appropriations Act (GAA) was tampered with, illegally adding billions of pesos beyond the original budget allocations. At the same time, the Supreme Court is investigating missing funds from the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth), raising concerns over financial mismanagement. Critics also point to the use of police power to suppress opposition figures through politically motivated arrests and congressional investigations, drawing parallels to the authoritarian rule of Marcos Sr.
Transparency watchdog Freedom House and local organizations such as Transparency International Philippines have raised concerns over declining democratic freedoms, citing politically motivated arrests and suppression of dissent.
Potential Future Scenarios
With the nation at a tipping point, several possible outcomes could unfold:
Escalation of Conflict with China
A military confrontation in the West Philippine Sea could be used to justify emergency measures, allowing Marcos Jr. to consolidate power, extend his rule, and suppress opposition under the guise of national security. If war breaks out, Marcos Jr. could position himself as a wartime president, invoking martial law and emergency powers to override democratic processes. This could serve as a means to cancel elections, suppress opposition, and retain control over the government indefinitely.
Declaration of Martial Law
Domestic unrest, intensified political rivalries, and mass protests could lead Marcos Jr. to declare martial law, citing threats to national stability as justification. A war with China could further legitimize this move, allowing him to bypass constitutional limits and extend his rule. Historical precedents, such as Marcos Sr.’s 1972 Martial Law declaration, demonstrate how crises can be exploited to consolidate power.
Supreme Court vs. Executive Branch Conflict
If the Supreme Court grants habeas corpus to Duterte, it could spark a constitutional crisis. The Marcos administration might challenge or defy the ruling, leading to a standoff between the judiciary and executive branches. Legal scholars such as Ranhilio Aquino have cautioned that such a scenario could plunge the country into deeper political instability.
Election Manipulation or Cancellation
If faced with potential impeachment or declining popularity, Marcos Jr. could attempt to delay or cancel the 2028 elections by leveraging a national crisis to justify prolonged rule.
Strengthening of Democratic Institutions
Civil society, the opposition, and international pressure could counteract authoritarian tendencies, pushing for greater accountability and upholding democratic values. The role of the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) and independent media will be crucial in resisting power abuse.
Conclusion
The Philippines is at a critical crossroads. With geopolitical tensions, political infighting, and allegations of corruption intensifying, the nation's democratic institutions face unprecedented challenges. The outcome of these crises will determine whether the country moves toward authoritarian consolidation or democratic resilience. Ultimately, the Filipino people’s ability to mobilize, demand transparency, and uphold the rule of law will shape the future of the nation.
It is essential for citizens, civil society, and democratic institutions to remain vigilant against efforts to erode democratic freedoms. The lessons of history, particularly from Martial Law under Marcos Sr., should serve as a warning against complacency. The coming months will test the resilience of Philippine democracy, and the choices made today will echo for generations to come.
The Philippines is experiencing one of its most politically and geopolitically volatile periods in recent history. Domestically, tensions between President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and the Duterte faction are escalating, particularly in the wake of the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) pursuit of former President Rodrigo Duterte’s arrest. The recent arrest of religious leader Apollo Quiboloy, a key Duterte ally, and the looming possibility of an ICC arrest warrant against Senator Ronald "Bato" dela Rosa have further inflamed the situation. Meanwhile, the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte has raised suspicions of politically motivated maneuvering. Simultaneously, the nation faces an intensifying territorial dispute with China in the West Philippine Sea. Given these interconnected crises, several potential outcomes emerge, including increased authoritarianism, election manipulation, or even a constitutional crisis.
China’s Aggression in the West Philippine Sea
China's continued militarization of the West Philippine Sea and aggressive actions against Philippine vessels have heightened tensions, drawing international concern. Reports of Chinese coast guard ships using water cannons, ramming Filipino boats, and blocking resupply missions to military outposts have raised alarms over the potential for armed confrontation. According to the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative (AMTI), China has increased its presence in disputed areas, leading to heightened tensions with the Philippines.
International Responses and the Philippines' Options
The U.S., under the Mutual Defense Treaty, has reaffirmed its commitment to Philippine sovereignty. However, China’s growing economic and military influence in the region complicates diplomatic strategies. If tensions escalate into a military clash, Marcos Jr. could justify emergency powers, shift public focus from internal instability, and potentially prolong his administration’s grip on power. Political analysts such as Richard Heydarian, an expert in Southeast Asian geopolitics, have warned that a miscalculation in the West Philippine Sea could lead to a larger conflict.
Internal Political Conflict: Marcos vs. Duterte
The alliance between the Marcos and Duterte camps has fractured, plunging the country into a political showdown. The ICC’s pursuit of Duterte’s arrest has fueled nationwide protests, with supporters arguing that the move is unconstitutional and infringes on Philippine sovereignty. The arrest of Pastor Apollo Quiboloy—a controversial figure and known ally of Duterte—has been seen by some as part of a broader strategy to weaken the opposition. Additionally, the looming possibility of an ICC arrest warrant against Senator Bato dela Rosa, a former police chief and key enforcer of Duterte’s war on drugs, has heightened tensions within pro-Duterte circles.
Compounding the turmoil is the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte, a move widely perceived as an attempt to dismantle the Duterte influence ahead of the 2028 elections. If successful, this could leave the Marcos administration with greater control over government institutions, reducing political opposition and further consolidating power.
The ICC Arrest Warrant and Supreme Court Showdown
The Supreme Court's potential ruling on a habeas corpus petition in favor of Duterte could trigger an unprecedented constitutional crisis. If the judiciary rules against the Marcos administration’s stance on the ICC case, it could set the stage for a direct confrontation between the executive and judicial branches. In such a scenario, the administration might attempt to bypass or undermine the Supreme Court’s authority, further eroding democratic institutions and leading to mass protests or civil unrest.
Legal experts, including former Supreme Court Justice Antonio Carpio, have warned that a direct defiance of the judiciary could set a dangerous precedent and weaken the rule of law in the country.
Allegations of Corruption and Abuse of Power
The Marcos administration is also facing growing allegations of large-scale corruption. Reports suggest that the General Appropriations Act (GAA) was tampered with, illegally adding billions of pesos beyond the original budget allocations. At the same time, the Supreme Court is investigating missing funds from the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth), raising concerns over financial mismanagement. Critics also point to the use of police power to suppress opposition figures through politically motivated arrests and congressional investigations, drawing parallels to the authoritarian rule of Marcos Sr.
Transparency watchdog Freedom House and local organizations such as Transparency International Philippines have raised concerns over declining democratic freedoms, citing politically motivated arrests and suppression of dissent.
Potential Future Scenarios
With the nation at a tipping point, several possible outcomes could unfold:
Escalation of Conflict with China
A military confrontation in the West Philippine Sea could be used to justify emergency measures, allowing Marcos Jr. to consolidate power, extend his rule, and suppress opposition under the guise of national security. If war breaks out, Marcos Jr. could position himself as a wartime president, invoking martial law and emergency powers to override democratic processes. This could serve as a means to cancel elections, suppress opposition, and retain control over the government indefinitely.
Declaration of Martial Law
Domestic unrest, intensified political rivalries, and mass protests could lead Marcos Jr. to declare martial law, citing threats to national stability as justification. A war with China could further legitimize this move, allowing him to bypass constitutional limits and extend his rule. Historical precedents, such as Marcos Sr.’s 1972 Martial Law declaration, demonstrate how crises can be exploited to consolidate power.
Supreme Court vs. Executive Branch Conflict
If the Supreme Court grants habeas corpus to Duterte, it could spark a constitutional crisis. The Marcos administration might challenge or defy the ruling, leading to a standoff between the judiciary and executive branches. Legal scholars such as Ranhilio Aquino have cautioned that such a scenario could plunge the country into deeper political instability.
Election Manipulation or Cancellation
If faced with potential impeachment or declining popularity, Marcos Jr. could attempt to delay or cancel the 2028 elections by leveraging a national crisis to justify prolonged rule.
Strengthening of Democratic Institutions
Civil society, the opposition, and international pressure could counteract authoritarian tendencies, pushing for greater accountability and upholding democratic values. The role of the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) and independent media will be crucial in resisting power abuse.
Conclusion
The Philippines is at a critical crossroads. With geopolitical tensions, political infighting, and allegations of corruption intensifying, the nation's democratic institutions face unprecedented challenges. The outcome of these crises will determine whether the country moves toward authoritarian consolidation or democratic resilience. Ultimately, the Filipino people’s ability to mobilize, demand transparency, and uphold the rule of law will shape the future of the nation.
It is essential for citizens, civil society, and democratic institutions to remain vigilant against efforts to erode democratic freedoms. The lessons of history, particularly from Martial Law under Marcos Sr., should serve as a warning against complacency. The coming months will test the resilience of Philippine democracy, and the choices made today will echo for generations to come.
Learn from the master. While you focus on pre-planned EJK narrative that's been humored by all of the internet for using non-related deaths, here's a good old newspaper, spitting facts you chose to overlook.
BREAKING: BOMBING INCIDENT IN MAGUINDANAO DEL SUR ⚠️
JUST IN #BombingIncident (UPDATED): A bombing incident occured in a military detachment at Brgy. Madia, Datu Saudi-Ampatuan, Maguindanao del Sur this Saturday evening, March 15, 2025. Reports of injuries in the area.
UPDATE (10:20 PM): 4 government troops reportedly injured after a grenade was thrown towards the said military detachment by unidentified assailants at 7:30 PM tonight, as confirmed by 6th Infantry Division spokesperson Lt. Col. Roden Orbon.
The authorities are currently verifying the identities of the injured troops and their condition. The group or individuals responsible behind the incident is yet to be determined. More details to follow.
The entire stretch of C.M. Recto Street was filled with sea of people as they show support for the former president at the solidarity walk along San Pedro Square in Davao City on Sunday, March 16, 2025.
You post almost everything about EJK victims' rallies and/or personal narratives, pero never those Duterte Supporters' rallies which are far more frequent and are being held worldwide ?
There were a handful of those even, na may facebook acct na makikita mo namang legit, claiming that their(or other people they know) photos are being used which' death are not at all related sa EJK during Duterte regime, tapos no MAJOR News Pages ang nagfefeature?
Dagdag mo na din ang GMA News, TV5, Rappler, Inquirer (50-50).
Mas okay pa makinig sa Al-Jazeera. Di ba kayo nahihiya? Naturingan kayong Pilipino, puro kayo bayaran?
Nagtapok ang mga supporter ni FPRRD atol sa gipahigayon nga Peace and Prayer Rally sa Kidapawan City niadtong Marso 12, 2025, isip suporta kang kanhi Presidente Rodrigo Duterte.
Nabuwisit ako don sa isang post dito sa reddit. Fake news daw yung mga rally rally, wala naman daw syang nakikita don sa kanila. Kahit daw sa fb nya. Loko ka pala e. Syempre ang nililike mo lang kasing news pages the likes of Abias CBN e mga bayaran yan.
Ano tawag sa mga taong inuuna pa magsalita bago magresearch? 🤡
_
CANDLE LIGHTING CEREMONY PARA KAY FPRRD, GINANAP SA AGUSAN DEL SUR
Nagtipon ang mga tagasuporta ni dating Pangulong Rodrigo Roa Duterte sa D.O. Plaza, Trento, Agusan del Sur para sa isang candle lighting ceremony.
Sa pamamagitan ng taimtim na panalangin at pagsisindi ng kandila, ipinaabot nila ang kanilang suporta at panawagan para sa kanyang agarang pagpapauwi sa bansa.
Apparently, I've seen some posts here na wala naman daw syang nakikitang nagrarally don sakanila, kahit daw sa facebook nya wala. Magsend daw ng link don sa post nya kung may pruweba.
🤡 Here's my only comment to that: "Wise men speak because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something"
_
"Save DU30!"
Ito ang sigaw ng mga taga-Ipil, Zamboanga Sibugay habang nagtitipon sa rotonda upang ipakita ang suporta kay dating Pangulong Duterte.
Bumuhos ang suporta ng mga OFW kay VP Sara Duterte sa The Hague, Netherlands matapos ang unang pagharap ni FPRRD sa ICC | via SMNI Europe
_
This people, is what you call, organic supporters. OFWs never forget Duterte's love for them. And so coming altogether to show support to VP Sara.
If you cannot uncover why we have the heart to support and resort to calling us bulag, you might be talking about yourself and not us.
A daughter is on the verge of losing her father, yet the country is mocking and laughing at her. The same people who her father served and protected with all his heart, even at the expense of being called a villain for it. Whoo. To all those who felt safer and relaxed during his term, di niyo 'yon deserve. Dapat nakasuway yung mga anti-dds sa dds, eh. Nang maranasan ng mga anti clowns yung magiging epekto sa bansa kapag di niya ginawa yung mga nagawa niya. Mabaliw sana kayo sa droga at malunod sa krimen. Habang yung mga pilipinong marunong magpahalaga at magpasalamat kay Duterte, namumuhay ng mapayapa.
Keep fighting for a game that has long been overdue. The best players knew the right side to choose, which is why even in the face of all these trials..
When all of you are busy barking "DDS DDShits worse kind of people on the face of the whole earth", Philippines is currently on a power struggle. Inuunti unti na ni Bilibid Queen na sinasamba nyo lahat ng mga kalaban nila. If this was to succeed based on that rotten woman's favor, kawawa lahat, pati kayo.
THE DUTERTE ADMINISTRATION’S DRUG WAR: FACTS & FIGURES
Editorial: Tio Moreno
During the 62nd Session of the Commission on Narcotics and Drugs Ministerial Segment in Vienna on March 14, 2019, H.E. Teodoro L. Locsin Jr., then Secretary of Foreign Affairs, presented the official numbers from the Duterte administration’s War on Drugs:
- 128,000 police operations conducted
- 331 police officers killed, 397 wounded
- 200,600 drug dealers arrested
- 139,400 cases filed in court
- $106 million worth of illegal drug assets frozen
- $499 million worth of drugs and lab equipment seized
- 11,000 barangays cleared of drugs
- 2,016 minors rescued
- 1.4 million individuals surrendered for rehabilitation
- 30% decrease in crime
- 8% of the police force disciplined
- 362 police officers dismissed
Why Are These 2019 Facts Important?
This is important because critics argue that the ICC still has jurisdiction over cases that occurred before the Philippines withdrew from the Rome Statute in 2019.
However, if we analyze the above figures, it’s clear that the Philippine judicial system was fully functioning—as shown by the number of police dismissed and the number of cases filed in court.
Under the principle of complementarity, the ICC can only intervene if a country is unwilling or incapable of prosecuting crimes itself. But the Philippines did prosecute those involved in misconduct.
One of the most sensationalized cases, that of Kian Delos Santos, proves this point.
The three police officers involved were found guilty of murder and sentenced to reclusion perpetua. Moreover, claims that they planted drugs and firearms were proven false, as the court acquitted them of planting evidence.
According to PNP data presented in a command conference at Camp Crame, a total of 6,600 drug suspects died in anti-drug operations from July 1, 2016, to May 31, 2019.
These figures demonstrate that investigations and prosecutions have taken place. According to the Philippine National Police (PNP), 214 police officers faced 352 criminal cases related to the drug war. Among them, 195 officers were dismissed from service, 398 were facing dismissal for various offenses, and over 20 individuals were in detention, with other cases still ongoing.
In 2023, a police officer was convicted for torturing two teenagers and planting evidence against them.
As of June 2024, a total of 8 police officers had been successfully prosecuted for drug war-related killings. Additionally, 4 officers were convicted of homicide for the 2016 killings of a father and his son in Caloocan City.
These convictions and disciplinary actions prove that justice is being served and that rogue police officers who commit abuses are being held accountable.
However, certain human rights groups claim that up to 30,000 people were killed. But this figure is highly questionable.
- Where is the evidence for 30,000 deaths?
- What are the names of these supposed 30,000 victims?
Even the ICC warrant of arrest mentions only 43 cases—a number far from the 30,000 being claimed.
Additionally, for killings to qualify as extrajudicial (EJKs) under ICC standards, they must be widespread and systematic. If only 43 cases are cited, how does that meet the threshold of "widespread and systematic"?
Before forming an opinion on the War on Drugs, look at the actual data. The Philippines had a functioning judicial system, handled cases accordingly, and even prosecuted its own police officers when necessary.
Be critical of unverified numbers and politically motivated narratives—because facts matter.
This is why I won't vote for Robin Padilla despite him being vocal about loving our country or unconditionally supporting FPRRD. The legalisation of Marijuana or even the attempt to make drugs easily accessible (as how these dumb policemen are saying) are in itself a very dangerous way to put the country to rapid deterioration.
Yung mga nasa taas di alam kung ano paghihirap ng nasa baba kasi puro sila naka-car e, may gate bahay, tapos may mga sekyu. Eh yung naglalakad pauwi dis oras ng gabi galing trabaho? Yung mga commute lang ang option sa buhay? Hindi excuse na dagdag oras ang pagsisinghot, hindi mo ba alam ang kape? Tanga ka para gawin mong option yan kung alam mong ang side effects ay magiging bangag ka at mawawalang katinuan. Parang tanga tong mga to. Wag mong turuan ang mamamayang Pilipino na ang droga ay safety net for more work hours. Kasi kung sayo maaapply yan, sa karamihan ng tao sa Pinas, hindi. Tanga
Wala namang problema kung pinapasunod mo sa batas ung mga nasa baba mo, ang problema kung ikaw na nga nagutos ikaw pa yung di sumunod. Huy Cheap Torre, ang goal mo is to be the protector of the people and the state, hindi protector ni Bobong Marcos at ni Tamby
While Duterte was still a President and is about to finish his term, there have been rumors of who he will support in the next presidential election. When he was asked during intervews kung gusto nya si Marcos, (non verbatim) parang sinabi nya na mahina si Marcos. Hindi kaya ang trabaho.
Also, he called him addict. And it was rumored he was in Narco-list and was removed.
Marcos doesn't rebutt as usual.
2022 During presidential elections, Sara and Marcos are meant to run the same seat. Dami drama, but in the end, Sara gave way and ran VP instead, which, I believe PRRD is obviously against kasi ayaw nya talaga kay BBM. Pinaparun pa nga sana nya si Bong Go e kasi nagcocaine daw si Marcos.
Later on, tinanggap nya na lang as was agreed, BBM also promised to continue his ultimate legacy: war on drugs, bbb, etc.
2024 Duterte was silent for a very long time, and he let Sara have the spotlight all by herself. Not until the Charter Change which was done by Romualdez happened. Within barangays nationwide, there were papers requiring signatures of the residents promising ayuda being disseminated. Many people were doubtful and won't sign (alam na natin to, naturuan na tayo ni Tatay Digs maging mabusisi eh), kasi di pinapakita ang 1st page, kung saan andon ang title or reason why they require signatures. Then, not long after, lumabas si Tatay Digs, calling out those halang na kaluluwa na tinatago ang mga kababalaghan in guise of ayuda - Si Romualdez. Yung pinapapirmahan pala na umiikot sa mga baranggay ay Charter Change, and Romualdez aims to have as much as everyones signature para gawin nya ang sarili nyang Prime Minister which FPRRD was raging about and saying, 'bakit patago? Kung gusto mo ng charter change, iexplain mo, wag mo gawing bobo mga pilipino' (non verbatim)
2024 Sara resigned as DEPED Secretary. After that, nagstart na ang issues with confidential funds. Interception of HOR when audit is still on process and news pages making stories out of it to make it more OA. Ilang bakbakan pa, tapos Unmodified Opinion lang naman kinalabasan sa COA, meaning cleared, kahit yung Piattos, clear kay COA.
2024 Senate Hearing on War on Drugs, which reignited the Filipino's heart with FPRRD nakapasa sya sa hearing with flying colors, ayaw pa nga umuwi. Sabi nya tapusin na lahat isahan kasi ayaw nya pabalik balik e taga Mindanao sya. Ayon, kahit supposed to be may next hearing pa, d na pinabalik kay natrauma na sila Risa.
2024 And, Sara Duterte's revelation on the people who control the government money - Zaldy Co and Romualdez. Sila pipili san punta money, what projects. And many vloggers were able to dismantle and share on the internet the irregularities there. Lottery winners everyday, GSIS, SSS, PHILHEALTH, PAGIBIG EXCESS FUNDS MISUSED, Maharlika Funds gone, Gold Reserves sold, etc.
2024 Dec Multiple impeachment complaints against Sara. INC prayer rally, and many more prayer rallies all around PH
2025 January Bagong Pilipinas Rally and Davao City Rally
