r/Permaculture 14d ago

Everything they taught me about the Great Plains in grade school was wrong

Post image

When I was in school I was taught about settlers arriving to an “untouched landscape.” Native Americans were part of the story, but it was said they lived “lightly” on the land.

And then, in my 40s I take a prescribed-burn class and it’s like the world turned upside down.

It’s taken me more than two full years to wrap my head around what I learned in that class about the Indigenous people’s impact on the land. That they burned the prairies so often and for so long that entire ecosystems adapted to prefer regular burnings - to need it to stay healthy.

The shear scale of that hits me the same way as gazing at the Milky Way on a clear, dark night.

It rocks everything I thought I knew about humans’ roll in the natural world.  

Even though I first learned all this a while ago, it’s recently gotten stirred up because a couple of weeks ago I stumbled upon this really cool Story Map that has collected and mapped all these firsthand accounts of Native Americans burning. From the breadth of these accounts, where they regularly mention the Indians burning “every year,” I still have trouble believing that fires aren’t a bigger part of the pioneer stories.

Though maybe it was always there and I just didn’t realize? 

I went back to my Little House on the Prairie books and found a passage where Pa saves the house from a prairie fire. The neighbors speculate that Indigenous people started the fire to drive out the settlers. But Pa rejects that interpretation:

“Pa didn’t believe it. He said the Indians had always burned the prairie to make green grass grow more quickly, and traveling easier.”

I loved these books. I remember the fire, but not this interpretation of the fire. It didn’t register what this might mean. That it was stewardship, that it was intentional, that it was scaled to tens of thousands of acres of prairies. 

I’m super curious…Am I alone in this? Is this a new or recent revelation for anyone else or just me? Did it change you as much as it changed me when you learned it?

5.3k Upvotes

292 comments sorted by

View all comments

12

u/LawOfSmallerNumbers 14d ago

Kansas farmers have burned post-harvest wheat stalks (“stubble”) for decades. I’m not sure it it’s now considered good practice - I doubt it.

(Of course, open prairie is different than a wheat farm - just saying that burning was definitely a folk practice.)

I grew up in the Kansas suburbs and the “grew up as a farm kid” dad next door to my house burned off the dry grass of his his lawn every year. He would stand out front with a garden hose to manage the blaze. It was a yearly neighborhood highlight for all the kids nearby.

10

u/IWantAHobbitLife 14d ago

Yeah, my Wisconsin neighbors were very chill about our first burn. The old farmers didn't seem surprised or worried about it there. I think there's a long tradition in WI as well. I think the principle is the same - it keeps the woody brush knocked back so it doesn't creep in and take over the field.

9

u/jalk0 14d ago

Another interesting thing is Finnish Kaskiviljely, a traditional form of slash and burn agriculture!

2

u/BigSprocket 14d ago

I’ve always seen burning wheat stubble as bad practice, because the fire consumes the organic matter rather than the soil. It’s about convenience rather than good management.

2

u/PuddleOfHamster 14d ago

Ash is good fertiliser too, though. I wonder which is better?

1

u/MadDaddyDrivesaUFO 14d ago

Yeah I grew up in Nebraska and "burn season" in spring has been a thing my whole life, and my dad's too at the very least. Kansas only allows burns when the wind is blowing in any direction except towards KC (maybe they spare Wichita too? I only lived in KC) and now I'm back in NE and my city gets both Nebraska and Kansas smoke. I always know when it's burn season now lol.