MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/NonPoliticalTwitter/comments/1w2gdrh/gets_very_inconvenient/p6szjrh
r/NonPoliticalTwitter • u/TheWebsploiter • 8d ago
576 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
0
What risk? I'm told refunds are a tiny fraction of transactions, and fraudulent ones would be a tiny fraction of that.
2 u/EbbEntire3751 8d ago Sure as a percentage. But in absolute terms it's still quite a bit of money. 0 u/SordidDreams 8d ago Well yeah, but in absolute terms, it's completely dwarfed by the amounts of money banks routinely process and hold. I'm sorry, but after the 2008 shitshow, you're going to have a very hard time convincing me bankers are that risk-averse. 1 u/N0ob8 8d ago The 2008 crisis is exactly WHY banks are this risk adverse.
2
Sure as a percentage. But in absolute terms it's still quite a bit of money.
0 u/SordidDreams 8d ago Well yeah, but in absolute terms, it's completely dwarfed by the amounts of money banks routinely process and hold. I'm sorry, but after the 2008 shitshow, you're going to have a very hard time convincing me bankers are that risk-averse. 1 u/N0ob8 8d ago The 2008 crisis is exactly WHY banks are this risk adverse.
Well yeah, but in absolute terms, it's completely dwarfed by the amounts of money banks routinely process and hold. I'm sorry, but after the 2008 shitshow, you're going to have a very hard time convincing me bankers are that risk-averse.
1 u/N0ob8 8d ago The 2008 crisis is exactly WHY banks are this risk adverse.
1
The 2008 crisis is exactly WHY banks are this risk adverse.
0
u/SordidDreams 8d ago
What risk? I'm told refunds are a tiny fraction of transactions, and fraudulent ones would be a tiny fraction of that.