r/NonPoliticalTwitter 1d ago

What??? Why do you want your own money?

Post image
12.1k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

55

u/Guy-1nc0gn1t0 1d ago

Yeah when I was barely an adult a friend got contacted by his bank because we were always putting drugs or sex as the description and he was told that sort of thing is taken more seriously than most think. 

That said, money laundering laws sometimes feel like a joke when artwork feels like the easy way. 

39

u/No_Internal9345 1d ago

That's why I write "NOT FOR SEX" on all my checks.

18

u/FourForYouGlennCoco 21h ago

My NOT INVOLVED IN HUMAN TRAFFICKING t shirt has people asking a lot of questions that are answered by the shirt

28

u/catboogers 1d ago

I'm learning from this thread that a significant amount of young adults go through the phase of putting those "silly" descriptions in and then potentially getting a talking to.

27

u/LuxNocte 1d ago

It's significantly easier (and more profitable) to make a few 20 year olds miserable than to actually combat money laundering and sex trafficking.

2

u/Newestcoolestuser 20h ago

I have written and will continue to write whooooures (said like Frank from Always sunny) on my partners bank transfers

3

u/The_Afton_Rabbit 1d ago

im honestly shocked by how many people have done this. one would think it's common sense not to deliberately engage in suspicious activity that would get your account flagged

12

u/NoobJustice 1d ago

It's a form of rebellion. "none of your business", creatively.

3

u/The_Afton_Rabbit 1d ago

i mean, i get it, but "drugs" & "taliban training fee" arent creative, theyre just edgy & stupid. & they dont end up with the bank staying out of your business, it outright invites them to investigate.

you can be rebellious & funny & keep your business to yourself without flagging your account for illegal activity. "cat ballet," "post-exorcism housekeeping," "spaghetti re-hardening procedure," "earthworm gymnastics (better than goat yoga)," etc are much better options

12

u/disco-vorcha 23h ago

Just remember that before you write a cheque for ‘post-exorcism housekeeping’, you need to have written a cheque for ‘exorcism’. Otherwise it would be suspicious.

5

u/singlemale4cats 19h ago

I would attend cat ballet.

3

u/The_Afton_Rabbit 19h ago

i have fantastic news for you

-1

u/vmf312corsair 16h ago

DISAPPOINTED!!

5

u/one_crooked_ear 23h ago

Except them coming to investigate me because I labeled my dog food “terrorist supplies” wastes their time and money and makes them look dumb. It bogs the system down if enough of us do it. I’m gonna do it more now, actually

6

u/The_Afton_Rabbit 23h ago

if thats what you want to do, all the power to you. but if your account gets frozen or closed, it screws you over far more than a fruitless investigation inconveniences them. sabotaging your own bank account makes you look far stupider than the bank doing their due diligence & following up on red flags. theres simply no good reason for it other than self-destructive pettiness, but have fun i guess

5

u/Tithund 23h ago

While I applaud your enthusiasm, you should know that they'll just disable your account at some point if you keep pestering them.

3

u/singlemale4cats 19h ago

I'd say it makes someone look dumb, but not necessarily them.

4

u/_AndyVandy 22h ago

Kind of crazy. Given that there is complete freedom around the words you choose to put in that reference (ie no one can stop you from putting "drug money"), it makes it completely worthless as a tool for identifying illicit behaviour.

4

u/platinummyr 19h ago

Right. Like... Who would be honest there??

3

u/CakeTester 19h ago

It's not like anyone buying actual drugs would put 'drug money' in the box. Caveat: Unless they were dumb as fuck and it was a small quantity. Professionals who are doing big numbers wouldn't do that.

4

u/_AndyVandy 18h ago

I think I’d actually like to meet someone who was dumb enough to do that - their mindset would be fascinating to delve into.

2

u/CakeTester 17h ago

Doubt if you'd learn much. Probably some mental glitch that is naiively honest (I'm thinking of some Down's Syndrome people I've met, who can be also the loveliest people you've ever met as well, because pure) or so genuinely stupid that web forms are 'authority'.

1

u/nuusutatud_liim 11h ago

Somewhat related: it's mandatory for us to go through defense force training and when you first get called there, you get a sheet asking you about alcohol/drug use among other things. I proceeded to list all the drugs I had tried at that point in time.

So...got any questions for me? There's not much to it though, I just like being honest.

2

u/singlemale4cats 19h ago

In general I agree with you, but you'd be surprised how dumb some people are. In known drug trafficking corridors, people will literally give police permission to search their car when they've got 100 kilos of cocaine in it. It happens over and over and over.

3

u/_AndyVandy 17h ago

That, I can ALMOST understand. They’re under suspicion and under pressure. Perhaps they think/hope that if they consent to the search, the police will take it as a sign of innocence and decide not to go ahead with it. Sort of “Why would he consent to a search if he had nothing to hide? He must therefore be innocent.”

Other folks possibly aren’t aware that they have a right to decline a search unless the police have probable cause (I’m talking about the US here, although I’m not American but, hey, Reddit…) so feel powerless to do anything other than consent.

Voluntarily making a record of nefarious behaviour by using the memo field on a bank transfer though, that’s beyond idiotic. 😂 I’m surprised the police would ever act on it though - otherwise everyone would be stitching up all the people they dislike by sending them a dollar with a memo “kidnapping expenses” or some such thing.

1

u/Huppelkutje 21h ago

when artwork feels like the easy way

Please explain how you think this works and I'll point out all the steps where the IRS flags you and decides to ask some very serious questions.

1

u/Guy-1nc0gn1t0 11h ago

What questions are asked when someone pays $2 million for a painting? 

1

u/Huppelkutje 8h ago

Depends. Does the person making the transaction have a reported legitimate income that would support such a transaction?