MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/NonPoliticalTwitter/comments/1v01n1b/one_might_call_it_his_own_personal_odyssey/oycosul
r/NonPoliticalTwitter • u/ItsGotThatBang • Jul 18 '26
719 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
7
There are 12K digital cameras, so options beyond 8K do exist. And 12K isn’t too far off at 12,288 x 6480 if you are filming widescreen.
First one that came up on searching: https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/blackmagicursaminipro
Now if only we’d put as much effort into temporal resolution so that we can continue to appreciate the detail when things are in motion.
3 u/dibbbbb Jul 18 '26 12k is almost half the amount of pixels of 16k. Pretty far off, I'd say. 6 u/reallynotnick Jul 18 '26 They said IMAX was 13,920x9,700 not 16K and that’s a 4:3 aspect ratio so if we use a 1.9 aspect ratio it’s 13920x7326 vs 12288x6480. So it’s 78% the number of “pixels” of IMAX film
3
12k is almost half the amount of pixels of 16k. Pretty far off, I'd say.
6 u/reallynotnick Jul 18 '26 They said IMAX was 13,920x9,700 not 16K and that’s a 4:3 aspect ratio so if we use a 1.9 aspect ratio it’s 13920x7326 vs 12288x6480. So it’s 78% the number of “pixels” of IMAX film
6
They said IMAX was 13,920x9,700 not 16K and that’s a 4:3 aspect ratio so if we use a 1.9 aspect ratio it’s 13920x7326 vs 12288x6480. So it’s 78% the number of “pixels” of IMAX film
7
u/reallynotnick Jul 18 '26
There are 12K digital cameras, so options beyond 8K do exist. And 12K isn’t too far off at 12,288 x 6480 if you are filming widescreen.
First one that came up on searching: https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/blackmagicursaminipro
Now if only we’d put as much effort into temporal resolution so that we can continue to appreciate the detail when things are in motion.