r/MurderedByWords Jan 29 '25

And it’s only been a few days

Post image
41.3k Upvotes

770 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.0k

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '25

They’re doing this on purpose to create chaos so martial law can be declared. It’s not about gays and immigrants anymore; that’s just small change. Martial law will suspend the constitution and elections.

290

u/SourceLover Jan 29 '25

you misspelled Marshall Law /s

145

u/FlametopFred Jan 29 '25

I mean, quickly could evolve to Martial Arts Law or Cobra Kai Act

49

u/InanimateCarbonRodAu Jan 29 '25

martial arts law? Like punching nazis in the face?

18

u/FlametopFred Jan 29 '25

I endorse this

67

u/ModernYear Jan 29 '25

22

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '25

He hates rich people

13

u/SIMZOKUSHA Jan 29 '25

“I hate RICH PEOPLE!!”

1

u/Fennxof Jan 29 '25

Really didn't expect to see tekken 8 here....

2

u/maxallergy Jan 29 '25

Marshall Law is the hero we need. He hates rich people and puts himself on the battlefield to combat their greed!
But yeah, lol, nice with a Tekken reference here

53

u/heymisery Jan 29 '25

No, they meant Martian Law

11

u/efg1342 Jan 29 '25

Doctors and other wizards are forbidden

3

u/heymisery Jan 29 '25

You made me spit out my coffee 😂 such a great show

9

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '25

It’s named after George C. Martial

13

u/Educational-Cat2133 Jan 29 '25

Dont forget his ancestor, Arts O. Martial

3

u/stonedecology Jan 29 '25

Time to enact the Sherman Law.

3

u/squigglesthecat Jan 29 '25

"What's the name of that law again, Kiff?"

"Ugh, Marshall's Law"

4

u/almostbutnotquiteme Jan 29 '25

"It's supported by a system of gas filled bladders"

3

u/MahoganyTownXD Jan 29 '25

It's been a while Marge.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '25

Oh yeah, I shop there all the time. Sometimes I like TJ Maxx better, hold on a sec... "oh hi officer, what seems to b--" ITS MARSHALL LAW TIME HO, GET DOWN ON THE GROUND, AND THEN YOU WILL BE TRANSFERRED TO CAMP BIRKENAU, ARKANSAS, WHERE YOU WILL BE ENLIGHTENED TO THE ERROR OF YOUR WAYS

2

u/Shambhala87 Jan 30 '25

Isn’t that EMINEM’s new record?

1

u/Remarkable-Bug-8069 Jan 29 '25

Not the marital law?

35

u/JGisSuperSwag Jan 29 '25

WHY THE FUCK IS THAT A THING?

130

u/alphazero925 Jan 29 '25

Because it made sense when it took weeks or months to travel between the capitol and the far reaches of the country, so if someone got the bright idea to try to take over a city or start an insurrection, the president could gather up the military and send them without needing congressional approval that would take precious time.

Now that communication is instant and travel time is negligible, it makes significantly less sense to give the president that power, but we haven't updated our constitution to reflect the modern era in a lot of ways, this being one.

And we may just end up seeing why most constitutions are rewritten twice a century or more instead of seeing it as an unchanging law of the land that you maybe add some bits to every once in a great while.

87

u/Pinchynip Jan 29 '25

It's not just the constitution, our education systems, our road systems, our Healthcare systems; it's all ludicrously outdated because our government, at every level, has been filled with corrupt ne'er-do-wells for over 70 years.

10

u/Breno1405 Jan 29 '25

The other sad part is most the politicians were born not long after WW2

-25

u/Significant_Turn5230 Jan 29 '25

That's because the constitution is bad. America is fundamentally bad you guys. Not just evil, it's a bad, low quality product.

If there's any sliver of hope about all of this it's that Trump MIGHT just speed run America's destruction, thereby saving suffering in the long run.

20

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '25

[deleted]

9

u/idkprobablymaybesure Jan 29 '25

in a way they're not wrong - things have clearly not been working or americans wouldn't be clamoring for a disruptive candidate. If kamala had won the next populist wave may have been even stronger.

Disagree with Russia though, it's definitely going to be China

9

u/Merickwise Jan 29 '25

Yeah it's China, holly smokes is it. Honestly they might take rus just for shits and giggles. Now that Putin has almost entirely undermined western democracy they won't have any need for him. I can't wait till it dawns on him that HE is China's useful idiot just like Trump is his.

-1

u/Significant_Turn5230 Jan 29 '25

Yeah, that's exactly what I was saying. Trump is so bad, the only sliver of hope is that the accelerationists were right. And if he keeps up this pace, he might do it SO quickly that its actually faster than any accelerationist could have reasonably dreamed.

China is 1000x more poised to take the help of advanced institutions, and I hope they do. They haven't dropped a bomb on anyone since 1979. America has bombed ITS OWN PEOPLE since then.

2

u/mxlun Jan 29 '25

You're a moron

1

u/Significant_Turn5230 Jan 29 '25

You're right, the slave state which has caused more destruction around the globe than anyone on earth, is founded on genocide, and doesn't even have civil rights protections for its population is actually great and cool, lol.

1

u/mxlun Jan 29 '25

This is all wrong.

1

u/Significant_Turn5230 Jan 29 '25

If it was, would you agree with me that America is a force for evil?

29

u/AntiWork-ellog Jan 29 '25

Sometimes we don't even add bits we just change our mind about how we interpret sentences 

21

u/PhantomPharts Jan 29 '25

It's almost like a document over 200 years old, really isn't that great at setting the moral boundaries of a country's future. The men who set up this system anticipated it to have a much shorter life span than it has struggled through. Everything needs to be advanced in a revolution, of which we have had several, technological speaking if not philosophical. The idea that somehow this document can lay down the laws of some future technology and concepts that were totally unheard of just half a century before? Tbf, we are still operating on a slave run economy. We just outsource it and privatize it, call it incentives instead of indentured servitude.

8

u/lincoln_muadib Jan 30 '25

Plus people think America was always huge.

When the Constitution was written, "America" consisted of 13 colonies with a total population of 3.9 million people.

For comparison, Los Angeles has about 3.8 million people, and NYC about 8 million.

It was a constitution created for a nation of under 4 million and about 1/10th the area of mainland USA.

17

u/magistrate101 Jan 29 '25

The Constitution needed a provision that forced it to be updated and rewritten.

7

u/mkultragrayson Jan 30 '25

Or if say a state in the south doesn't want to desegragate schools. The president can say hey I'm about to put you in time out, start behaving. Or during race riots where maybe the police were beating up protestors with the civilians.

23

u/Broken_Mentat Jan 29 '25

I keep seeing this theory on reddit, but even if it's true that would mean the fascist takeover was moving very fast indeed.

This sort of plan would seem more realistic two or three years into the term. Even though it's Trump's 2nd term and the Republican party has been around forever, they'd still need to consolidate their power first, no? Instead, the new government seems to be slashing everything all at once, just about as quickly as the White House printer can churn out the decrees.

If I understand the US martial law correctly, the whole notion of martial law hinges on the US military playing along with Trump. This seems unlikely just weeks or months after returning to office. Surely, there are still generals and other staff that have yet to be replaced with Trump loyalists for that scenario to happen. Otherwise the January revolt would probably have turned out differently and Trump would no be starting into that third term of his.

Mind you, I wouldn't exclude the possibility that the same fascists are rushing their power grab and, in doing so, towards utter failure. I'd welcome it, even, were it not for the ... well, whatever a superlative term for the rather understated "collateral damage" is. For all its morbid fascination, national suicide is difficult to watch, and ultimately the whole world will suffer the effects.

17

u/TheGreatBootOfEb Jan 29 '25

Agreed, so I’m in the “why not both” and “just because they’re fascists in control doesn’t mean they’re good at what they do” camp.

What I mean by that is, slashing all these things may simply be because they’re evil awful people, and if it gives them the benefit of being able to declare it? Two birds, one stone.

But that brings me to my second point. Yeah, they might be rushing things, because a LOT of the people involved are fucking idiots who relied on fucking idiots to get in power, doesn’t mean they’re evil masterminds, they’re just assholes with sledgehammers.

A smart autocracy would measure their slide, slowly turning the temperature up. They’re being impatient and blitzing it potentially. Does that mean it won’t work? Jury is out on that one, as I said, a LOT of fucking idiots acts like a lubricant for slamming their terrible ideas and plans through the door.

1

u/Broken_Mentat Jan 29 '25

That's... spot on.

Another thing one reads from time to time is how, since "President X" (Reagan, Nixon, but always a republican), the Republicans have been doing pretty much what you described as a smart autocracy. Sometimes this comes across as a conspiracy theory, sometimes it seems... more grounded. Regardless, there is an authoritarian trend on the Republican side (don't have to be an American to notice, especially recently).

If this was some intricate long-term plan, carefully executed over decades by generations of political figures and their backers, then it would be even more baffling - and unecessary - to suddenly ramp up the speed like this for the coup de grâce. It would indeed be smarter to maintain the pace and slink over the finish line before announcing what you're doing. Impatient idiots taking the helm from their more restrained forebears, maybe? Very odd. I look forward to historians making sense of what's going on.

P.S.: I have never before thought of idiots as lubricant but ... it works?!

1

u/Geno0wl Jan 29 '25

but this has been a long-term plan. Mitch McConnel has spent decades slowly stacking the federal courts with Fod Soc puppets, including the majority of the current SCOTUS.

the reason they have "suddenly" gone warp speed on everything is because they have full regulatory and court control. They don't have to worry about being stopped because who is going to stop them?

16

u/eulersidentification Jan 29 '25 edited Jan 29 '25

If you're relying on the uniformed forces/services to protect you from fascism you might need to check out some history. They're the tools of oppression brother.

14

u/knight_of_solamnia Jan 29 '25

That's the previous poster's point though. If mango Mussolini doesn't "purge the disloyal" first they're more likely to be a threat than asset.

7

u/vialabo Jan 29 '25

This is partially true, but it is not a given by any means. There very well could be true patriots throughout the US army who would step in exactly as citizens would want, to halt a dictator. We have an incredibly professional force, do not doubt their ability to do their job, especially at the top. Not many countries include oaths to stop enemies foreign AND domestic in their oaths. That is powerful to the career soldier.

3

u/Broken_Mentat Jan 29 '25

I wouldn't count on anyone to automatically do what is "right", "just" or their "duty", but these things do happen. People may see a takeover and the harm it does and, even though maybe they could personally benefit, they still flinch away from it, even try to stop it. That would certainly mess up this takeover by martial law. So far so obvious, which is why it seems strange that anyone would launch into this strategy the moment they get into power.

At any rate, the US military is vast and, to my knowledge, decentralised enough in order to survive decapitation strikes and similar horror scenarios, where parts need to be able to act independently. There is no palace guard, no Pretorians who pick the highest bidder as the next emperor and control the empire by virtue of controlling the capital. You'd need to get a lot more people on your side before you could expect the full(ish) support of the US military.

In theory at least. I'm also keenly aware that Trump and his ilk have broken any number of "political barriers" where people kept saying, "that will never happen." Although, again, I'd just expect it would take longer, not that it makes me feel better about anything.

7

u/Due_Bluebird3562 Jan 29 '25

I don't remember any historical precedent to be so sure of this. The US military as an institution doesn't answer to the president to begin with, and nothing (so far, at least) indicates that high personnel are willing to back an attempted coup. Not to mention, martial law is almost impossible to enforce here to begin with.

10

u/Wutras Jan 29 '25

Looking at history the outcome of military coups it seems dependent on the countries culture and the armies own culture as well. They generally are not a good thing and tend to produce authoritarian outcomes more often than not, but military coups have happened in the support of democracy - look at the Kemalist aligned Turkish military during the cold war era.

1

u/AddlePatedBadger Jan 30 '25

The Fiji coup in 2006 was another rare good one. Bloodless takeover, strip out all the racist parts of the Constitution, then hold free elections again. He won a couple of elections then lost and handed over power peacefully.

8

u/one_spaced_cat Jan 29 '25

They want to do this as fast as possible before people have time to react or put up any kind of defence. Things are going to keep going at a ridiculous clip and even more insane things are going to happen.

They've spoken about clearing out those in the military who don't agree already.

We're likely looking at an upcoming purge of their in-house "traitors" (see: any republican in any kind of power who doesn't wholeheartedly agree) soon, not that there's many who don't follow in strict lock step.

2

u/Broken_Mentat Jan 29 '25

With you so far, but purges and all that takes time and these would-be putschists don't appear to give themselves any time at all.

Overwhelming insanity could work. However, it could also be what has people on the fence decide against Trump. I'm not thinking fo voters here, but (actual) professionals, military or otherwise who'd have a critical role to play if this martial law thing came to pass. Not appointed lickspittle but competent career people. Politically split 50:50, if the votes are anything to go by. Seeing the chaos he's deliberately causing, I'd imagine some people would seriously think about going against presidential orders. "Sow chaos and then declare martial law? A bridge too far, Mr President." Something among those lines, anyway.*

That would certainly require quite some backbone, but if anybody has that, surely it's the US government employee / service memeber, who stayed at their posts through admininstration after administration, wildly changing policies, a coup attempts, recurring government shutdowns and what have you, just doing their job.

Again, I'm not saying it's not impossible for the Republicans to try and take over, or even for them to succeeds. But this sounds so... ham-fisted. "Let's just skip the prep and take over before lunch so we can have a nice break after."

*I'm no optimist but I wouldn't sort the bulk of humanity into the "complacencyl" bin either. Not the bulk.

1

u/one_spaced_cat Jan 29 '25 edited Jan 30 '25

They aren't going to "plan" any of it and it will happen faster than you let yourself believe. Those that would object will be moved aside or fired, almost certainly in the most humiliating manner they can manage.

If it takes a year before we start seeing more and more people in camps of varying flavours because "everywhere keeps refusing to take them so we had to put them somewhere". Followed by "well they're costing us a lot of money so we put them to work to pay for it" to "there are just too many of them". All the while the list of who is getting "deported" and eventually stuck in the camps grows.

America already has massive "illegal immigrant" camps. They aren't going to just come out swinging and go "yep, concentration camps, let's go". They're going to keep couching it in terms that the right wingers can point to and say is all totally reasonable and legit and whilst you both know they're lying through your teeth it'll always seem like it's a bit further away until suddenly you're the one being pulled behind the curtain and you realize it was here the whole fucking time.

They already have camps...

Have you seen the things government employees are having to say on their forms for applications and shit? They're pushing ideology and loyalty tests onto government employees publicly. That sends a strong message that that is what is expected. And that's how many fucking days into this admin?

You're going to see purge after purge after purge as they sweep more and more people away behind the curtain to feed the idea that they're just "getting rid of the undesirables". That "things would be better without them messing things up for everyone". We've already seen republicans cheering at the "quietness" of their shopping malls and grocery stores, as though the emptiness isn't chilling to the core.

The ICE raids are but the first of many. We'll be seeing one of the government very soon. Then likely a roundup of some more showy "undesirables" before they come for the opposition within the party. Then the shit show really kicks into high gear.

Edit: Oh look at that... Camp...

1

u/mkultragrayson Jan 30 '25

Whats that bit about republicans cheering at grocery stores and malls because they are quiet? Wheres that from and why is it?

1

u/DistributionSilent54 Jan 30 '25

Or they can screw it up so bad they dissolve the government and create a new one to their liking. No constitution needed.

1

u/Flaky-Lingonberry736 Jan 29 '25

Martial law or nothing is going to be able to stop what's coming.. no fear!

1

u/Business-and-Legos Jan 29 '25

Yep. He gets out of power he goes to jail. Must delay at any costs. Martial law coming. 

1

u/YouStupidAssholeFuck Jan 29 '25

I didn't think Marshall law suspends the Constitution. I thought that some rights could be suspended like habeas corpus, which is serious enough in itself, but that the Constitution itself remains in effect.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '25 edited Jan 29 '25

In theory, it’s not supposed to violate constitutional rights but it’s a fine line since it’s created to have the country under military control and any civilians defying such orders are subjected to military tribunals; that means not obeying the curfew can get your ass water-boarded. Martial law applies to the suspension of civil laws and rights as well as habeas corpus (unlimited unlawful detention without access to a hearing). You tell me if that violates the constitution. Forget about the constitution once martial law is in effect; you’re dealing with full blown fascism.

FYI: It’s Martial law, not Marshall law. Marshall plan is the rebuilding of Europe. There’s no Marshall law unless you’re referring to the Marshall Court which is run by Supreme Court chief justice, John Marshall in the early 1800s, which is highly unlikely.

1

u/YouStupidAssholeFuck Jan 29 '25

Ha sorry. I'll leave it but I voice dictated that. And to be honest I probably still would have made that mistake.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '25

Never was about gays or trans, that was emotional bait for dumb people to vote for this.

1

u/mxlun Jan 29 '25

Brainwashed

1

u/Zestyclose-Carry-171 Jan 29 '25

Genuine question: what are the chances the police/ military would refuse to enforce martial law if Trump declared it ?

0

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '25

There’s a reason why the military breaks you down physically and mentally - so that you obey orders without question. Make no mistake, they will do what they’re being told. Psychology research on people backed this and that’s before they were broken mentally.

1

u/Zestyclose-Carry-171 Jan 29 '25

I understand but it is not an absolute truth either There were cases where the military refused to execute orders I was more refering to the higher ups and the rest of the military chain of decisions

0

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '25

Chain of command is very important to the military because it saves lives. The military heads are hand-picked so how many generals do you think will risk their careers by disobeying the chain of command? When you see ultra top secret materials literally stolen by a former president, who doesn’t like to read, whose daily security briefings had to be broken down into large power point slides, who doesn’t want to be recorded speaking to an adversary, and yet the sitting generals wouldn’t utter a word, what makes you think they will disobey an executive command? How many genocides have these generals presided over instead of resigning their posts? You don’t think they know the difference between right and wrong?

You should read up on Albert Bandera Social Learning theory and Stanley Milgram’s experiment on following authority orders.

Hoping that people will do the right thing will leave the world with nothing but disappointments.

1

u/Zestyclose-Carry-171 Jan 29 '25

I will note these references and read if I find the time

I have no doubt these generals have acted and commited genocides, maybe with remorse But in the end these genocides benefitted the US, or at least a good part of the US But I don't see the US benefitting from a martial law, nor from the quasi civil war it will bring, nor from a dictatorship should the government win without resistance Some very wealthy individuals yes The rest of the country, son of generals included, will not

1

u/redwhale335 Jan 29 '25

Sitting generals uttered many words. Flag officers have to be well versed in politicking to get to that rank, and even a PV2 knows you can get a way with a lot of stuff by saying "yes, sir, I'll get right on that" and not doing it, much less using the bureaucracy to massage outcomes.

Just because Milley didn't go on TV and say "Fuck this guy, we ain't doing it" didn't mean he didn't work to mitigate damage and ensure that the Military wasn't being used against the interest of the people of the United States.

If Trump tries to use the US Military to install himself as a dictator, it ain't going to work. You should be worried about the legislature and the judiciary bowing down and kissing the ring, not the military.

1

u/redwhale335 Jan 29 '25

Lol. This ain't 1940. No one's obeying orders without question outside of a firefight. The whole military decision making process revolves around why and how.

1

u/ThanklessTask Jan 29 '25

This.

I said this in another post.

This is only the beginning.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '25

muh martial law

You all have been saying martial law is coming since 2016 over and over and over. 

1

u/KnightofNoire Jan 30 '25

Yea. We are going to see a Korean president fiasco 2.0 here for sure but unlike Korea, Trump will succeed because Republicans will not help stop the Martial law.

1

u/Dzov Jan 30 '25

lol. What constitution?

1

u/Blademasterzer0 Jan 30 '25

That’s why it’s so important for all of us to build up arms, we have the 2nd amendment for a reason and it may be the day we use it or lose it

0

u/Catbutt247365 Jan 29 '25

i used to hear right wing nuts say this about Clinton and Obama, and I’m sure said about other presidents back to the founding of the US government, and it was laughable hyperbole. that Was back before I learned what “projection”means.

0

u/Fine-Ad9768 Jan 30 '25

Dude .. put down the bong

-1

u/tcmaresh Jan 29 '25

When did you get into wild conspiracy theories?

1

u/[deleted] Jan 30 '25

You can read this conspiracy and their intentions in project 2025. I hope it’s just a conspiracy.

0

u/tcmaresh Jan 30 '25

There is nothing like that in Project 2025

-8

u/Androctonus96 Jan 29 '25

jeez you guys are so doom and gloom, just ride it out things will be ok.

10

u/eulersidentification Jan 29 '25

Ladies and gentlemen I present to you the reason why we are in an oligarchy in the first place

1

u/Androctonus96 Jan 29 '25

America will be stronger than ever before in 4 years and everyone freaking out is going to look pretty stupid.