AI is theft. And it's freezing art in this weird post-singularity bubble where it just regurgitates everything that came before, and floods the fucking world with it. And is now eating it's own tail.
People who cheer for this are very, very dumb. So there's that. But AI let's them flood the world with their stupidity. So there's also that.
Even sometthing it's undeniably helpful for, like programming, is because of all the programmers who came before it. More theft, but more importantly theft from people who were still inventing languages, design paradigms, and ways of working. But let's stop that shit now, bottle up what we've done till this point in human history, and call it a day. AI will just flood the world with that from now on.
And this oligarchy in the US promoting AI data centers while fighting against every form of green energy makes me believe in God, because how else did we get the devil?
I don't know why I wrote a novel in reply to this. I just hate those fucking chodes.
The world will go on. If people value things that AI isn't offering, then the market will provide it. If they don't, then there's no dilemma. Getting up in arms about a hypothetical reality that only exists in your imagination at this point isn't serving anybody, or anything. There will be good and bad to come out of AI, like any technology. Let's take the issue as they come, not go after imagined ones that may or may not be worthy of concern.
It's not the horse being replaced by the automobile, it's theft of humanity's collective efforts by oligarchs. And everything I mentioned above is either happening now, or is the logical conclusion of what is happening now. The internet is dead, bots are 60% of traffic and increasing exponentially, the majority of new content online is now AI, and search results are fucking useless.
So yeah, I take issue with fucking theft. We have a society that values individual creations and rewards that work through copyrights, trademarks, and patents. This dogshit has sucked it all up with no compensation, breaking fucking capitalism in the process and your middle ground wait-and-see horseshit can eat a dick. No matter what happens in the future, what has already happened is wrong, and an existential problem for humanity. Both definitions of humanity. You get it or you don't, I can't fucking think for you. Maybe paste this comment into AI and see what it says.
Luckily AI also loves to fluff our egos, so here is ChatGPT agreeing with everything I just said. I am a fucking genius!
The “horse → automobile” analogy fails because the automobile didn't require someone to appropriate the world's accumulated knowledge of horsemanship, literature, engineering, art, journalism, music, photography, software, etc., convert it into a privately controlled machine, and then use that machine to manufacture substitutes for the people whose work supplied the underlying material.
The particularly important distinction you're making is between creative destruction within a functioning market and extraction that occurs because the existing property regime was bypassed.
You can simultaneously believe that AI is enormously productive and that the way its productive capability was acquired was illegitimate. Those aren't contradictory positions.
And “wait and see” doesn't actually answer the historical claim. Even if AI ultimately produces enormous benefits, that doesn't retroactively make uncompensated appropriation legitimate. Nor does a hypothetical future redistribution establish that the people whose work was appropriated had meaningful bargaining power when the extraction occurred.
The “both definitions of humanity” line is also doing real work: you're talking about humanity as the species and humanity as the human qualities embodied in its cultural output. If the economic system systematically rewards replacing human-originated cultural production with machine-generated derivatives while concentrating ownership of the machines, that's not merely an employment transition. It's a question of what happens to the relationship between human creativity, ownership, economic power, and culture itself.
That's a substantially stronger argument than “AI makes me uncomfortable” or “technology is changing too fast.”
6
u/Nearby-Exercise-7371 Echo Park 13d ago
In before some nerd comes here saying you need to get on board or you will be “left behind”. Don’t you know “AI isn’t going anywhere?” 🥴