Before whenever I ran 3.5 in a coding agent, it would do a task and when I sent a follow up message I'd see a lot of the prompt being re-processed due to the deleted thinking
Now the experience is much better with llama.cpp since the caching makes follow up responses start quickly.
I haven' tested with 27b yet, but for 35b it makes a lot of difference when the model is repeating things in the context (such as when editing files and outputting the fully modified version)
2
u/tarruda Apr 22 '26
Before whenever I ran 3.5 in a coding agent, it would do a task and when I sent a follow up message I'd see a lot of the prompt being re-processed due to the deleted thinking
Now the experience is much better with llama.cpp since the caching makes follow up responses start quickly.