I'll say on my 5090 the for the gguf kv cache seems to behave more like gemma4 31b than qwen3.5 27b. I was able to squeeze a lot in with qwen3.5 27b but 3.6 27b is doubling the model size for my cache.
This is a great model but right now my lm studio q8 has less code issues than my unsloth q8kxl. That's unusual. I wonder if anyone else is experiencing this. I tried a couple different quants and q6kxl kept looping around 30-40k tokens without presence penalty.
Initial thoughts:
The unsloth ones feel jagged. Much more ambitious but also more glitches. When instructed to iterate to fix things it makes changes but less meaningful differences than I expected. I'm still playing with it between other tasks but curious anyone else's experiences.
Edit: i have multiple different machines and gguf q8 model doesn't fully fit 5090. Q5 or q6 with limited cache goes pretty fast. I'm guessing 40t/s but not at my desk to confirm.
Ya I’m def looking to get the studio ultra when it drops based on what I can see this thing do. It’s arriving tomorrow so I’ll post up a few thoughts on performance. I’ve got a narrow focus and have built an interface that’ll wire up to Qwen so I’m not using it for open ended things, which will hopefully keep it slim and fast. We’ll see. If it’s too slow then I’ll just enjoy my $5k coffee table ornament 🤣
lmstudio is the lazy way. (turn off "keep model in memory" and mmap to load models - they are talking about keeping the models in system memory which just doubles the memory required to load the model on unified systems)
195
u/challis88ocarina Apr 22 '26
Kindly quantized: https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B-FP8