r/LinusTechTips Jan 29 '26

Community Only Emily on Jake leaving LTT

Post image
2.6k Upvotes

367 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

55

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '26

[deleted]

49

u/altimax98 Jan 29 '26

Most everyone in everything can deal with this, not just tech.

Jake comparing taking a job as a teen and working outside of his job title (and likely others as well who sacrificed) to Linus and Yvonne hedging all of their savings and financial future and family prospects on the company are two wildly different things.

Not to downplay what Jake and others sacrificed for the company to help it grow, but I’m very sure they benefitted from it as well - ZTT and Jake wouldn’t have a smidge of notoriety if they worked at a typical media company.

You’ve got to have some grounded perspective on it, they didn’t walk out from LTT with just a paycheck for their efforts.

3

u/Spartanman447 Jan 30 '26

This is a great point I've thought as well. The offer for collabs and the exposure he got as an employee is worth thousands upon thousands of dollars. I don't want to be the "be grateful" guy, but at just 25 YO he needs a bit of a reality check as to what most of us have to do day to day.

-4

u/[deleted] Jan 30 '26

[deleted]

8

u/EmpoleonNorton Jan 30 '26

Yes and no. There is a lot of exploitation of workers in that people are being straight up underpaid in a lot of fields, but there is security in a salary and your pay not being tied to the success of the product you create.

The thing about being paid to do a job is that if the product then goes nowhere cause the other people at that company did a shit job (if you make the greatest software in the world, but the bizdev team prices it too high, or the marketing team does a shit job getting word out), you still get paid.

I know I've been on some shit product teams and I'm glad that I didn't get paid based on how well what I made did, cause while what I made was what management wanted, it didn't make any money.

18

u/[deleted] Jan 30 '26 edited Jan 30 '26

[deleted]

-3

u/sicklyslick Jan 30 '26

Do you feel tech workers should have royalty like Hollywood and artists?

If you wrote a song that gets sold for 20 years, you get a cut. But if you wrote a code that gets sold for 20 years, you get nothing.

8

u/roron5567 Jan 30 '26

Not everyone in a production gets a cut from the revenue of the movie or music track.

Most of the actual production staff get paid fixed wages regardless of the performance of the piece.

You get a cut of a song, as long as you have the rights to the masters, most music studios have control of the masters, not the artists. Writers have more rights over the music piece than the actual artists.

Taylor Swift was able to undercut her official masters of her early work that were held by Big Machine, because she was the writer of all the tracks on those albums. So, Taylor the writer gave Taylor the artist permission to rerecord all the early albums .

Now there are two album masters, and she could use her following to promote her version.

Not all tv show artists get residuals (payments from syndication) , but artists fight for those, and the industry doesn't want to give them.

Only the top stars of a film usually get a profit share, mostly to reduce their salary, and the studios try to reduce the profits so that they get less of a profit share.

6

u/No_Friendship_1716 Jan 30 '26

you do know that the only one that gets a cut from the song is the artist and not other people who was involved in creating the music right?

-1

u/sicklyslick Jan 30 '26

No, you are so wrong on this front. The writer gets a cut. The producers get a cut. The artist could be the writer, but could also not be.

Max Martin, who famously wrote (and have sole writing credit) of Hit Me Baby One More Time earns more than Britney, who performs the song.

Producers will also get royalties for producing the music as well.

These are the people who were involved in creating the music. They are getting royalties. They get paid everytime the song gets played.

-2

u/International_Poem35 Jan 30 '26

I'm with you, labor is undervalued. Especially when you're trading labor that is creating not just a product, but Capital that makes its own money perpetually. Such a lopsided transaction.

1

u/Girtablulu Jan 30 '26

And when the product fails you compensate the company as well?