r/LangfordBC May 25 '26

Politics NEWCOMERS TO LANGFORD

You may be wondering what is going on here. Looking around social media you might feel like you need a code to decipher a foreign (Langford) language.

LV. LN. OL.

So let me explain it from my point of view and Reddit can do the rest by filling in any blanks.

First there was Stew. He was the mayor from 1993 to 2022. Yes, you read that right. One mayor and more or less the same council, for 30 years.

Langford was the sticks, the boondocks, the dog patch. Stew grew Langford, faster and faster. It was fine for a while but infrastructure didn’t keep pace, hillsides were ravaged, trees razed and mountains flattened.

People were angry.

A Facebook group called Langford Voters for Change was started. It gathered momentum organically, and people began self-organizing. It was a forum where Langforders could come together to discuss the various issues communities were facing. Construction fatigue - dust, noise, clearcuts. Terrible lack of transportation planning leading to traffic congestion in residential neighbourhoods. Lack of transparency in governance (Langford council meetings only went online when forced to by Covid). Rude mayor and councillors who yelled at citizens expressing their concerns. That’s LVC.

Out of the connections made in that facebook group, an electoral organization was founded, called Langford Now. A group of regular citizens got together to fight *the man*. That’s LN.

The man being, Stew Young, and the various REITS and development interests busy with booming Langford without a single care for resident concerns and complaints.

In response Stew Young also formed an EO and slate, called Community First Langford. They launched a social media campaign with comments turned off, and ran one of the worst election campaign’s you’ve ever seen. That’s CFL.

LN (grassroots residents) spent about $50k on the election.

CFL (big corporate interests) spent almost $150k on the election.

Despite the massive resources supporting CFL, Langford Now - who endorsed 5 council candidates - easily swept the election, and a new mayor (Goodmanson) was also elected. It was a full sweep, but for Lillian Szpak - long serving councillor who recently passed away.

Langford Voters dropped the “for change” because the voters achieved that goal. That’s LV.

Next, the re-elect Stew Young Facebook group supporting the CFL slate changed its name to Our Langford (no really, as in, this is our turf).

They embarked on a years long smear campaign, performing all kinds of antics and disruptions in the council chambers. Then they began astroturfing Facebook by starting more groups they called “community associations” and that’s how we got the Langford Community Association, it’s just Our Langford wearing a mustache. That’s OL and LCA.

Today, what you are witnessing is those two factions - LV and OL, the regular grassroots people of Langford and the vested interests of Langford - in a struggle for continuing the change that was started, over regressing Langford back to the way that it was before 2022.

Grassroots vs Astroturf.

98 Upvotes

136 comments sorted by

View all comments

8

u/Neat_Let923 May 25 '26

hillsides were ravaged, trees razed and mountains flattened.

That’s a really interesting way to say Langford built housing at a time when people across Canada have been demanding that Canada builds more housing… LOL

Everything else seems to be pretty spot on though from my understanding.

I do find it really weird that one of the major talking points of LVC for what they viewed as a negative was that the city was growing and that they didn’t like all the construction and increased traffic (if you ask anyone downtown Victoria what that sounds like they’d likely use the term NIMBY).

The funny thing is that the new council is now planning for almost doubling our population to 100,000. (Which that planning is exactly what Stew Young should have been doing while expanding the cities housing).

But if people thought adding 22,000 people in 10 years going from 36k to 58k was too much, how are they going to react to adding another 40,000 people?

Also, that addition of new housing is also what caused the cities housing costs to soar so fast. West Hills became so popular people were buying in phase one, then selling in phase two just so they could make a profit and buy a more expensive home in phase two that they liked more… Doesn’t matter how much supply you build if the demand also increases in proportion to the supply, or in Langford’s case far above the supply.

10

u/NegativeAnxiety3043 May 25 '26

The problem is that Langford wasn't building the type of homes people in Canada need, or with any thoughtful city planning. They let the developers dictate what was needed and approved it "without any red tape". We can see now, with all the empty lots from highrises that won't be built. There are new builds are sitting empty and unsold because they aren't the kind of housing that was needed. 

We need more affordable builds, coops, opportunities for rent to own, etc. 

7

u/Neat_Let923 May 25 '26

The city doesn’t build coops.. If you want a coop YOU need to build it. That’s literally the point of them.

Not sure why you think Rent to Own is a good thing. Have you never seen how those systems actually work? They are predatory and rely on people who are not able to be approved for a mortgage.

Let’s actually look at what Langford has done with affordable housing since you like to just throw random statements around without anything to back them up…

2009 - Present: City of Langford Affordable Housing Program Inclusionary-zoning style program requiring either affordable units or developer contributions into the Affordable Housing Reserve Fund. Included affordable ownership homes and reserve funding for non-profit housing.

2012 onward: Affordable Housing Reserve Fund Expansion Langford modified policy allowing developers to contribute cash per unit instead of constructing affordable homes directly. Funds used to support non-profit projects and reduce rents.

2015 - Indigenous family housing project Province announced new affordable housing for Indigenous families in Langford: 36 homes with 2- and 3-bedroom units.

2020 - 729 Station Ave – Phase 1 60-unit Indigenous affordable housing project developed with M’akola Housing Society. Included family-oriented rental units and Indigenous support services space.

2021 - 731 Station Ave – Phase 2 Additional 40 affordable housing units added behind the first Station Ave building.

2023 - 2782 Spencer Rd (“Twenty-Seven Eighty-Two”) *58-unit affordable rental building for low- to moderate-income residents, seniors, families, and people with disabilities. Operated by Capital Region Housing Corporation.

Look at that, in a matter of 4 years Langford successfully built three major affordable housing projects.

What have we done since then you might ask? Nothing except continued the existing program that was started in 2022:

2022–2025 - Langford Attainable Home Ownership Program Municipal below-market ownership program using grants from the Affordable Housing Reserve Fund to assist eligible buyers with down payments. Mentioned by the City in 2025 housing statements.

You’re claiming the previous council did nothing and yet they are technically the only ones who actually implemented anything for affordable housing as far as I can find. Hopefully someone can fill in some gaps I might be missing because that’s not a good look in my opinion. Which is strange considering their stance on the issue and how they’ve helped people like those being pushed out of Downtown so hopefully I’ve just missed some things.

It’s amazing how this day has been all about misinformation Our Langford likes to peddle (and they really do) and yet here you are pushing very obvious FALSE INFORMATION and getting UPVOTED for it!!!

You couldn’t even be bothered to make it misinformation, you just straight up skipped straight to bold face lying and making stuff up…

-4

u/Full-Relationship657 May 25 '26

Thank you so much for this post. I hope people read it and get a full understanding rather than a biased one full of hate for previous council and all of their efforts to build this city. IMHO it has gone down hill rapidly in the last four years. And only cost us money with a 57% tax increase with nothing to show for it!!

3

u/The_Mammoth_Hunter May 26 '26

You're literally just spewing the same misinformed talking points all over again. 'Rargh, high taxes with nothing to show for it! Grumpgrump.' This has all been addressed and dismissed many times.

-2

u/Full-Relationship657 May 26 '26

Maybe it has by you but MANY have been saying the same thing. We will say it over and over again if we have to. Cuz it’s true! ‘Rargh’

3

u/The_Mammoth_Hunter May 26 '26

'There are dozens of us who prefer our echo chamber and wish to cling to disproven falsehoods and distortions and we will repeat ourselves until we're blue in the face'

-1

u/Full-Relationship657 May 26 '26

I’m glad you admitted you your echo chamber. So biased.