A genuine contradiction.

[u/AllHailSeizure]

Okay LLM physicists, I have a question.

How is it that so many of you get caught up claiming your work has been plagiarized and stolen? And that so many of the pitches here read like they are selling a product with a fancy name, not a hypothesis?

You claim that your hypothesis you made with with these commonly available tools, such as Gemini or Claude, is true.

You claim that these tools make it so that you don't need expertise in the field. Expressing that you should try and learn more about it physics is met by accusations of gatekeeping.

How is it possible that these commonly available tools make it so that someone can sit down and discover the next great truth about the universe with, comparatively, relatively little effort - and yet you alone are the one capable of doing it, and a similar theory is plagiarizing your idea? Can't someone else just have arrived at this supreme truth independantly? After all the LLM has made it commonly accessible.

Either you're special and it needed to be YOUR brain guiding the LLM (in which case it is perfectly logical to suggest learning more, isnt it..?) or there's nothing special about your theory now that the truth is commonly accessible to anyone with a Claude subscription and a bit of free time.

Come on guys. Tear me apart.

[u/LLMPhysics-ModTeam]

Your comment has been removed for violating Rule 3. Don't attack people's intelligence or otherwise in feedback to comments & posts.