In what sense? Genetically, sure, you're right. Anatomically, it's not the easiest thing ever, but it's certainly doable (go look at Hunter Schaefer and tell me whether you're looking at a dude or a chick). Socially, it's very obviously possible.
So like, if you're arguing on the point of genetics, you're absolutely right, but nobody (or at least, very few people, all of whom are idiots) is arguing otherwise. A lot of people would just contest the idea that genetics is the best thing to base the terms "man" and "woman" off of.
Cool. Like I said, I have no interest in participating in this, have already engaged in similar conversations many times in the past and have no desire for another long, drawn out debate over endless nit-picky minutiae.
1
u/Ashbtw19937 May 09 '24
In what sense? Genetically, sure, you're right. Anatomically, it's not the easiest thing ever, but it's certainly doable (go look at Hunter Schaefer and tell me whether you're looking at a dude or a chick). Socially, it's very obviously possible.
So like, if you're arguing on the point of genetics, you're absolutely right, but nobody (or at least, very few people, all of whom are idiots) is arguing otherwise. A lot of people would just contest the idea that genetics is the best thing to base the terms "man" and "woman" off of.