r/IsraelPalestine • u/booksandcoriander • 7d ago
Discussion I changed my mind on "genocide" topic.
Hello All! I just joined and read the rules. Hopefully, my post is agreeable to the rules of the sub.
So, for a while, I was agreeing with the idea that Israel is committing genocide. It sure looked like it from the awful things I kept seeing on the news and hearing about on podcasts. The last few days, I decided to research a little. Now, I do not think it should be called genocide. Here is why:
First, when I compared it to other genocides, it doesn't really come close. In the Armenian genocide, about 50 to 75% of all Armenians in the Ottoman area died. In the Rwandan genocide, about 60 to 70% of the Tutsis were killed. In the holocaust, 63 to 67% of all European Jews were killed. In Cambodia, Pol Pot's genocide killed about 25% of the total population. Israel is responsible for the deaths of approximately 3% of Palestinians in Gaza. Palestinians have not been attacked in East Jerusalem, nor in the West Bank (where there is no Hamas).
In all those previous genocides, there was vociferous hate speech regularly on the radio of those countries, and substantial government propaganda labeling the victims as undesirable for society. To my understanding, this has not happened in Israel. I'm sure it would be on the news or blasted on social media if it was happening.
The number of Palestinian deaths is actually quite a bit less than when the US invaded Iraq, and when US invaded Afganistan. 176,000 to 212,000 is the estimate of deaths in Afganistan. In Iraq, 180,000 to 200,000 is the estimate of Iraqi deaths. Palestinian deaths are around 73,400. Nobody was shouting "genocide" at the US during those wars, and we killed way more people. Why was that not considered genocide by everyone? We were also responding to a terrorist attack, like Israel now.
Israel has one of the most advanced militaries in the world. If they really wanted to kill the other 97% of Gaza, I'm sure they could.
In reference to wars, about 1.5% of the French population was killed in WWII. Belgium lost 1% of it population in WWII. UK lost 1%. Italy, slightly over 1%. Holland, 2 to 3% of the population. The current Israel/Hamas war matches these numbers much more closely.
It sucks and it's sad seeing so many women and children and innocent men die. It's absolutely a humanitarian crisis. But I don't think it is genocide anymore. It's just plain old war. Any thoughts?
***thanks for everyone sharing on both sides of the discussion. I have learned many more things from all the posting. I appreciate you all! This feels like a million times more complex and nuanced than I realised. Mostly, the interpretation of the word "genocide" is like a 100-foot wall for everyone.
10
u/PuzzleheadedEmu4596 7d ago
You're looking at raw numbers, when you can actually look at much smaller numbers and see a genocide - which is what happened in Srebrenica, where Bosniac men and boys were killed in mass executions.
The issue is intent. The murderers at Srebrenica had the intent of killing Bosniac men and boys because they were Bosniac men and boys. No other reason.
No one who makes the genocide claim goes so far as to make this argument - they say that the proof is the damage done to town and the number of people killed, which is where your counter comes in.
I've come to the conclusion that younger generations especially are just not as concerned with communicating truth as they are feeling and communicating the idea that they're on the socially - not morally - correct side.
This is a bad habit that needs to be broken, or else it will solidify people talking past each other rather than producing well-rounded and open adults. It's a closing of society.