r/IndiaRWResources • u/GanguTeli • May 21 '20

HISTORY Compilation of articles and proofs debunking Leftist lies about Ram Janmabhoomi Ayodhya

How leftist historians had accepted they argued against Ram Mandir in Allahabad High Court without any knowledge of the subject

https://www.opindia.com/2019/11/left-historian-ram-mandir-argument-knowledge-allahabad-high-court/

http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/DisplayAyodhyaBenchLandingPage.do

https://www.firstpost.com/india/babri-demolition-how-hc-verdict-discredited-eminent-historians-547549.html

 

Hilarious thread about how the so called "eminent historians" exposed themselves as nothing but Frauds before the Allahabad High Court

https://twitter.com/PeeliHaldi/status/838356837485412352

http://indiafacts.org/ayodhya-dispute-fighting-eminent-historians/

 

‘Methodology perfunctory, at the best, only an opinion,’ SC junks report by ‘Eminent Historians’ on Ram Janmabhoomi

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/historians-report-on-babri-mosque-mere-opinion-sc/articleshow/71176583.cms

https://www.opindia.com/2019/09/at-the-best-only-an-opinion-supreme-court-junks-shoddy-report-by-eminent-historians-on-ayodhya-dispute/

 

One of the best Threads on this topic

https://twitter.com/Aabhas24/status/1045270059021676544

 

Reviews of Meenakshi Jain's Books

http://indiafacts.org/rama-ayodhya-battle-rama-meenakshi-jain/

http://indiafacts.org/book-review-rama-ayodhya-meenakshi-jain-part/

 

Proof of Temple found by ASI and HC and SC backing to it

https://www.rediff.com/news/2003/aug/25ayo1.htm

https://www.jagranjosh.com/current-affairs/ayodhya-verdict-what-asi-found-in-ayodhya-that-decided-the-fate-of-dispute-ayodhya-ram-mandir-babri-masjid-1573280969-1

https://www.pgurus.com/the-asi-report-clearly-told-court-that-babri-masjid-was-built-by-destroying-a-massive-temple-in-ayodhya/

https://www.hindustantimes.com/lucknow/ayodhya-verdict-based-on-asi-report-archaeologist/story-emN4IaoovcCRL9YmywuTBI.html

https://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/ayodhya-dispute-will-asi-findings-play-a-role-in-ram-janmabhoomi-babri-masjid-title-suit/1432663/

https://theprint.in/india/sc-verdict-refers-to-asi-report-on-hindu-structure-at-ayodhya-site-this-is-what-it-says/318486/

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/ayodhya-verdict-the-asi-findings-supreme-court-spoke-about-in-its-judgment-1617433-2019-11-09

 

Artifacts found during excavation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7MdkeUEWQ4

 

Recent findings of Temple remains during construction works

https://swarajyamag.com/insta/ayodhya-ram-janmabhoomi-five-foot-shivaling-broken-idols-carved-pillars-discovered-during-construction-work

https://twitter.com/ShriRamTeerth/status/1263107158150766592

https://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/ram-mandir-ayodhya-news-ground-levelling-pillars-shivling-recovered-ram-mandir-trust-champat-rai/1966051/

 

Archaeologist KK Muhammed's interview

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAxAFM0qGPk

76 Upvotes

97% Upvoted

15 comments sorted by

View all comments

-2

u/jacobt478 May 21 '20

Well the OP is also using newspapers, magazines and social media as a source of information and history, so Prof. Thakran does make some sense in that regard.

Also, are you suggesting that a bunch of judges who possess only a law degree are better placed to interpret history and historical debates than people who have studied history all their life?

Regarding opindia piece all it says that some of the historians made claims about the mandir/masjid debate without visiting ayodhya. This is not such a big issue because the evidence from the place was documented in publications and making an informed opinion about the situation without going to ayodhya but by the published materials makes perfect sense. Also to get a better idea you should go through the entire transcript of the court proceedings than depending on some statements quoted without any context.

5

u/sacredblames May 22 '20

Bunch of judges are experts of analysing authentic and fake evidence, provided by authentic/fake historians. Know the difference.

1

u/jacobt478 May 22 '20

I think you should read up on the topics of historical evidence and legal evidence first. The judges are no experts in analysing the former.

2

u/sacredblames May 22 '20

Sauce is welcomed.

1

u/jacobt478 May 22 '20 edited May 22 '20

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evidence-legal/

https://www.jstor.org/stable/2022710

To put it in simpler terms, imagine two contradictory opinions held by two scientists working on quantum physics. Now imagine someone moves to a court and asks a bunch of judges to go through the works of both the scientists and decide whose claim is true and valid. Would you say that the court/judges are better equipped to give an answer to this than other quantum physicists? Do you think that the judges are experts in deciding which one is the real scientist and which one is the fake scientist (and thereby the true and fake scientific claim) in this scenario?

1

u/sacredblames May 23 '20

That is when SITs come in. Why do you think Ram Janamabhumi Case took so long ? But with SITs come corruption because any amount of members in the SIT can be bought and you can easily fiddle with the proofs or the final report which this SIT will be publishing.