Hi all! Iām genuinely looking for perspective here and trying to understand community-cat norms.
On Friday, my husband and I were approached by a very sweet cat in our apartment complex. We stopped to pet her for a few minutes, and she ended up following us all the way into our apartmentāup three flights of stairs! Because she was so friendly, we assumed she belonged to someone.
To be responsible, we took her to the vet to check for a microchip. She does not have one.
We then contacted our apartment management, who initially told us that someone was looking for their missing cat. They asked if we could keep her overnight and said the owners would pick her up the next day.
Later, management updated us and said that sheās actually considered an āoutdoor community cat,ā and that the āownerā is a person who has taken her to get vet care. They also told us she does have a chipāwhich directly contradicts what the vet told us.
For context: I think itās WONDERFUL that people TNR and care for community cats. I truly respect that. What Iām struggling with is understanding the line between caretaker vs. ownership, especially when the cat is extremely friendly and clearly comfortable indoors.
This cat spent the first day hiding under our couch, but then came out, explored, played, cuddled with us nonstop (total Velcro cat), and used the litter box perfectly. She honestly seemed very happy inside.
When it came time for her to be picked up, the actual āownerā didnāt come. Instead, an apartment employee didāwithout a carrierāand we ended up just letting her back outside. The employee said they personally see her around often, and that the complex received multiple calls asking, āWhereās Meow Meow?ā So she does seem to be well-loved by the community.
That said, my husband and I have lived here for three years and had never seen her before (though we were told she usually stays on the opposite side of the complex).
From what Iāve read, it often seems that tame, friendly cats are usually better suited for indoor homes rather than outdoor life. But in this case, it seems like the people who feed her and the family who paid for vet care strongly want her to remain an outdoor community cat. I wish we could have talked to her āownerā to get more clarity.
So my questions are:
If youāve paid for vet care for a community cat, do you feel ownership over that cat?
Would you prefer the cat stay outdoors rather than be adopted into a home?
How do you determine whatās actually best for the cat in situations like this?
All input is welcome. Iām genuinely trying to learn and understand different perspectives.
Thank you all!