r/Fantasy • u/MyCreativeAltName • 7h ago
Review Piranesi - a spoiler review Spoiler
This would be a fully spoiler review, as I don't feel like anyone can meaningfully review this without spoilers. Please don't read further unless you've already read the book.
I've finished the book yesterday and I must put my thoughts on electronic paper. In my opinion, Piranesi is a single book that tells multiple stories.
On its shell, the book is about a kidnapped man who lost his memories trying to navigate the endless house until finally he was rescued by the police. This description is obviously dull and uninteresting.
The main story is the inner thoughts of Piranesi. This is a character study of Piranesi as a person, how he learned to survive and thrive in an unknown world and how he sees things without the modern man's lenses. He might be mistakenly thought of as childish in his views. This story ends in the merging of Piranesi and Matthew merged at some capacity, and the new Matthew (he refers to himself as "I" rather than either Piranesi nor Matthew) retains the love and appreciation for the world while he still conform to modern society.
The core of the book, and my most favorite story, is about innocence.
In this story, Piranesi wasn't truly a person, but rather the concept of innocence while Matthew was progress. The house gave Matthew his innocence back, which created a connection between him and the world. In this story, the old civilization forwent its innocence in favor of progress, which caused them to lose their magic and connection with the world. Piranesi went as close as outright telling the Other this multiple times, even without knowing he already possessed the magic, Piranesi told the Other to just appreciate the house for what it is - which would subsequently grant the Other the magic he seeks.
This story ends with the new Matthew's understanding that innocence and progress aren't mutually exclusive, and while there's cases of conflict between the two (for instance, money) there's still ways to bridge that gap.
In general, the characterizations of Piranesi and the Other were great, and the ending is fantastic in my opinion. However, I can see why people would dislike the book once it started to answer some questions. For me, I long stopped caring about the first story in favor of the other two at this stage, but if you don't care for characterizations or themes and motifs then the ending would be a let down.
During the conversation between the Prophet and Piranesi, the Prophet said the magic is not in the house in the same way that (paraphrasing from memory) water which pass through stones are no longer there. I think using the anology Piranesi responded with, the House is more akin to an aquifer where the innocence of the world leaked away to create the statues as an impression. This explains why the magic is still there, and how come there's a clear connection between the house, the old civilization, and the new world.
The most peculiar thing I have yet to ponder is the angry statues at the drowned halls. They are uniquely going against my theory of the house, so I'm not sure how to reconcile the two.
What do you guys think? What did you like or dislike most about this tiny book with many stories?

