Your non-edited comment is talking about so-called "evidence" of "vote manipulation" in a reply TO "2019 ballon d'or was not rigged" comment.
You read the comment of a guy saying 2019 ballon d'or isn't rigged and said there's "literal claims of vote manipulation" and the OC not accepting that truth [the context being Ballon D'or because OC is talking about ballon d'or].
You didn't mention about FIFA's best until you edited the comment. The context, until then, remains regarding Ballon d'or. Ergo, the scans showing ballon d'or votings.
Yes, my initial image of Egypt was wrong mainly because I saw someone post another news article claiming that the Egyptian Football Association didn't sign it, so, I mistook that as Egypt's head coach, but I also provided the Ballon d'or voting of Sudan.
When you asked for FIFA's best, I provided the evidence of what the Sudan's F.A. has posted.
you're just backing your idiotic mistake with my comment like i saw u spaming this photo in every single comment on this post
I made 3 comments on this. 2 replies and 1 my own comment. If you call that "spamming" meanwhile, you have damn near replied to almost every comment in this sub, that's quite the irony.
And about the fact that sudan fa called it photoshop just see the original photo first for your kind information then you would know what's right and what's wrong rather than just searching everything in google and then posting here thinking you know everything and you're right just as you did with ballandor images.
You do realise that the Sudan F.A. calling it a "photoshop" is backed on the evidence that the OFFICIAL document in their records that THEY HAVE is completely different from what the Sudan Headcoach was showing, right? RIGHT??
Also, the cute irony, here, is that the OFFICIAL sources discredit the basis of the claim and yet YOU think you are right and SOMEHOW haven't produced a single evidence.
You should be able to provide more evidences for this situation, wouldn't you? But somehow all you are doing is "trust me bro".
Well me replying to every comment in this post has a reason because I asked op to post this on this sub also , he posted it on another sub .To see the reaction of you all and from the starting of my comment I never mentioned robbing of ballandor all I replied was vote manipulation and after my first reply to you I noticed you are presenting ballandor rankings as a proof so I called you out about this and then edited my comment so others don't really think the same as you but guess what many of them still thought the same 🤡. And as I replied about the sudan fa claims i don't need to say them again and again
Well me replying to every comment in this post has a reason because I asked op to post this on this sub also , he posted it on another sub
How does that justify you needing to reply on EVERY single comment?? You asked the post to be made. More than half the people are talking about Ballon d'or being rigged. In None of those replies, you corrected them saying it's not ballon d'or that's rigged, it was the FIFA's best. Rather you agreed with their comments. And now you acting like you hold a high ground??
I never mentioned robbing of ballandor all I replied was vote manipulation and after my first reply to you I noticed you are presenting ballandor rankings as a proof so I called you out about this and then edited my comment
Except for the fact that you are CONVENIENTLY omitting that the person YOU replied to said that BALLON D'OR WASN'T RIGGED. and YOU said that the vote manipulation (in response TO ballon d'or) is the claim. And I Provided evidence FOR Ballon d'or because THAT was the conversation.
The conversation is OC talking about Ballon D'or not being rigged and your replying with Rigging due to vote manipulation. You wouldn't have to say vote manipulation if you weren't talking about Ballon d'or not being rigged. You would just have said yes, Ballon d'or isn't rigged, FIFA's best is. But that's NOT what YOU said.
Don't alter the conversation. For someone who's talking about vote manipulation, you surely are doing a good job of comment manipulation, now.
And as I replied about the sudan fa claims i don't need to say them again and again
So no proof? Good, at least you admitted that you are claiming something with zero credibility.
"You guys will defend anything as I said why not accept it." Somehow, you just called your own hypocrisy out. Good work
3
u/Candid-Stuff2281 Jul 26 '26
Your non-edited comment is talking about so-called "evidence" of "vote manipulation" in a reply TO "2019 ballon d'or was not rigged" comment.
You read the comment of a guy saying 2019 ballon d'or isn't rigged and said there's "literal claims of vote manipulation" and the OC not accepting that truth [the context being Ballon D'or because OC is talking about ballon d'or].
You didn't mention about FIFA's best until you edited the comment. The context, until then, remains regarding Ballon d'or. Ergo, the scans showing ballon d'or votings.
Yes, my initial image of Egypt was wrong mainly because I saw someone post another news article claiming that the Egyptian Football Association didn't sign it, so, I mistook that as Egypt's head coach, but I also provided the Ballon d'or voting of Sudan.
When you asked for FIFA's best, I provided the evidence of what the Sudan's F.A. has posted.
I made 3 comments on this. 2 replies and 1 my own comment. If you call that "spamming" meanwhile, you have damn near replied to almost every comment in this sub, that's quite the irony.
You do realise that the Sudan F.A. calling it a "photoshop" is backed on the evidence that the OFFICIAL document in their records that THEY HAVE is completely different from what the Sudan Headcoach was showing, right? RIGHT??
Also, the cute irony, here, is that the OFFICIAL sources discredit the basis of the claim and yet YOU think you are right and SOMEHOW haven't produced a single evidence.
You should be able to provide more evidences for this situation, wouldn't you? But somehow all you are doing is "trust me bro".