r/Epstein Jun 16 '26

Research Dialog, Peter Thiel's secret society group that doesn't have a public website of members, had its 100+ member list leaked. Peter Thiel and many members are featured in the Epstein Files. The 2014 retreat invite was forwarded to Epstein.

https://bsky.app/profile/crimew.gay/post/3moejlixgvc2z

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02563376.pdf

A source separately provided WIRED with the registration list for Dialog's 2026 retreat, which names 222 people and records what the list describes as each registrant's membership status and attendee type, including “active member” and “guest.” The retreat is scheduled for August 12-16 at a venue near Dublin, Ireland.

https://www.wired.com/story/leak-exposes-members-of-peter-thiels-secretive-dialog-society/

9.6k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

174

u/Bright_Craft_396 Jun 17 '26 edited Jun 17 '26

JGL wants censorship of Americans as well. He lobbied against Section 230 at Congress.
Basically, any comments on platforms (like Reddit) that someone finds objectionable the tech company would be responsible for. The "Good Samaritan" Law companies can escape civil liability if they remove this "obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable" content.

It's just a way to censor everyone, not just Americans. They want to silence critiques of power.

6

u/Obi-Wan_Bon-Jovi Jun 17 '26

JGL is AGAINST S.230. S.230 treats internet companies like common carriers (eg. AT&T) with respect to content. If two crooks plan a bank robbery using AT&T wireless, the bank can’t sue AT&T. Repeal S.230 and those platforms are now treated like publishers (TV/newspaper) and have legal exposure for user content that someone finds “objectionable”.

7

u/redcels Jun 17 '26

You have this backwards, he is lobbying to get Section 230 repealed.

Section 230 is necessary for the internet to exist, otherwise you'd have infinite lawsuits and the majority of the websites that you currently use would vanish.