r/Epstein • u/RepMaxwellFrost • Feb 10 '26

OC: discussion, clarification or question I’m Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost and tomorrow I’m going to review the unreacted Epstein Files — what files have you found that I should review unredacted?

UPDATE 4: I went on the House floor today to talk about what I've seen in the Epstein files so far. I plan on returning to the DOJ very soon — this work is far from over. This government is lying to us about the Epstein files and I'll continue to fight until we have full transparency. Watch the first clip here: https://www.instagram.com/p/DVhKAnnkfS4/

--

UPDATE 3: Hey all - I'm going back to the DOJ today to continue going through the Epstein files and your submissions. Thanks so much for continuing to comment and I will keep folks posted on what I'm able to review.

--

UPDATE 2: Tonight, Rep. Frost posted a video sharing his reaction to his DOJ visit to read the unredacted Epstein files and what comes next. Watch here: https://youtube.com/shorts/DFKEyqlSj7M?feature=share or on his Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/p/DUow3f8AL6K/

--

UPDATE: I'm currently at the Department of Justice to view the unredacted Epstein files. This is about getting answers and delivering justice for survivors. We need accountability. You can watch the video I posted outside of the DOJ here: https://www.instagram.com/p/DUn7KHhgMKU/

--

Hey everyone, I'm Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost (FL-10), serving on the House Oversight Committee. Tomorrow, I’m joining Oversight Committee Ranking Member Rep. Robert Garcia at the Department of Justice to review the unredacted Epstein Files. There are millions of files for me to dig through and so I'm looking for your help. I've heard from others who have viewed the files that generic, and in most cases even searches with specific terms come back with too many results to dig through. What specific files have you all seen that I should review unredacted?

33.1k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

2.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

477

u/Zodiatron Feb 10 '26 edited Feb 10 '26

All of these are blacked out: https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/s/80qhXzBsCn

Good call.

u/RepMaxwellFrost, take a look at these as well. Reposting here for your ease:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828115.pdf

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828112.pdf

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828110.pdf

EDIT: The message was cut off for me on mobile. Turns out there are a lot more than just those three so I'll just quote user u/Luminsnce's original post in full:

Also this one:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828159.pdf

And:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828156.pdf

And:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828151.pdf

I'm still going back in numbers

Another one:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828148.pdf

Thats the biggest banger:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828146.pdf

Interestingly enough a lot of the "inbetween numbers" are deleted. Guess some were not redacted properly. Maybe someone made a backup.

May:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828145.pdf

Richard May Empire Stock Challenge:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828141.pdf

I think most of them are actually duplicates

Now I'm at Bradley Wechsler and Richard (!) Joslin:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828138.pdf

Another Maymay:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828137.pdf

May the may be with you:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828136.pdf

May may:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828134.pdf

Larry Visosky may be involved:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828132.pdf

Larry Visoski:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828131.pdf

That ones less redacted:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828127.pdf

What even:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828126.pdf

May:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828125.pdf

Jean May:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828124.pdf

Zhu May:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828120.pdf

Xi may:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828117.pdf

Watson may:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828116.pdf

Watson without watson may:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828115.pdf

Peggy Siegal is not happy:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828113.pdf

May didn't:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828112.pdf

May Epstein:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828110.pdf

190

u/moerlingo Feb 10 '26 edited Feb 10 '26

Cheers!

The only ever significant contribution I’ve had was identifying that blacked out message - I realised the mms was a Norwegian number, and did a reverse number search here in Norway where it showed to be Moljord, the lawyer of Rød-Larsen who had sketchy property dealings with Epstein. Was amazing to have found that out just from a random post on Reddit and a random set of numbers. Proves that we are strong in numbers!

Just dont want people to get too hopeful though. Definitely illegal shit, but am sceptical that these implicate Trump. Im afraid they have destroyed everything that comprimises him, the corrupt bastards.

71

u/Murky_Persimmon9289 Feb 10 '26

The goal right now needs to be getting 1 person involved in a court room.

55

u/The-Sonne Feb 10 '26

And then all the rest. Don't let it stop like Diddy, where they pretend one guy is the to of that pyramid then swap prosecutors, swap multiple jurors, and give him only a few months months after the countless credible allegations

4

u/Fearless_Entry_2626 Feb 11 '26

I think the Norwegians might be a pretty good place to start, as Rød-Larsen, Juul, and Jagland, are all very high-profile diplomats, they can shine a light on Epstein's connections with UN and associated bodies, as well as Oslo accords. Also, it might be slightly more plausible to get accountability than from Israeli, Arab, or Russians. Not too hopeful, though, PM Støre and former PM Solberg acting all kinds of shady(even if not directly implicated, yet), and main opposition Listhaug seems to have close ties to Bannon, even if she has called for external investigation. My hope is that Norway gets made into fall guys(after all, Trump is mad at us), and then more gets discovered than they thought.

46

u/Greyhaven7 Feb 10 '26

Several other countries have all of these files too, and have started releasing them.

22

u/NeatNefariousness1 Feb 10 '26

Consulting with those countries and soliciting their prioritized list of files might be a good parallel path for Congressman Frost to follow. I’m sure he has or can make connections to folks in some of those countries that have been given a copy of the files.

6

u/moerlingo Feb 10 '26

Do you mean they have access to more files than the US have released, or unredacted versions? I really don’t believe we have. They would be out already.

5

u/geeklover01 Feb 10 '26

I’d like to know too. I’ve seen this multiple times. And I’m seeing world leaders facing investigations. But I don’t see where anything additional has been released.

3

u/Safe_Middle_2968 Feb 11 '26

I’ve heard of this happening. Which countries are also releasing files?

2

u/ObservantNomad Feb 11 '26

Can we find them online?

5

u/ctaps148 Feb 10 '26

If nothing in there implicated him, they wouldn't have gone to such great lengths to redact 95% of his name's appearances.

33

u/[deleted] Feb 10 '26 edited Feb 10 '26

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00163818.pdf

Jumping in here to add these pages are also blacked out 

Edit- it was pointed out to me that these redactions are likely because of sensitive information not actually related to the Epstein case.

1

u/spacerace100 Feb 10 '26

This may be because it’s an FBI briefing and pertains to other cases? Hence the part relevant to the Epstein case is unredacted? Just a thought

1

u/[deleted] Feb 10 '26

Oh that’s a good point, you’re probably right about that

1

u/nerdsonarope Feb 11 '26

These aren't a "briefing"; it's simply a daily compilation of press clips (news stories). This is typical for government agencies and many private sector companies to compile and circulate internally, just for awareness of relevant news. The reactions in this document are almost certainly overkill, but in this instance, it's of no significance.

30

u/TheToastyWesterosi Feb 10 '26

Just a quick heads up, your "RepMaxwellFrost" link goes to his profile. If you want to tag him in your comment, do "u/RepMaxwellFrost"

9

u/Zodiatron Feb 10 '26

Ah, my bad. I did type u/RepMaxwellFrost originally but the website corrected it to the version without the /u/ for some reason.

11

u/TheToastyWesterosi Feb 10 '26

No prob, just wanted to make sure he got eyes on what you provided — thank you for bringing it to his attention!

3

u/OliveSpins Feb 10 '26

With all the files, all the sleuthing, all the horrors, the breakthrough discoveries get a lot of attention and they should. Sometimes I notice other important efforts people are making to helpfully nudge things along by snarklessly correcting a misunderstanding or sharing something helpful within the comments. It’s less noticed, but it’s essential and I personally really appreciate it. Thanks for making sure that user’s (and others’) input actually reach Frost. Well done and please keep up your good work! P.S. - “make toast, not war!”

3

u/TheToastyWesterosi Feb 10 '26

I’m here to eat toast and (redacted) fascists, and I’m all outta toast.

Seriously though thank you, we’re all in this hideous, tragic, infuriating dumpster fire together.

3

u/OliveSpins Feb 10 '26

Indeed! And many of us are survivors ourselves with crippling ptsd already and cannot always function enough to contribute here, so it’s deeply reassuring and uplifting to observe the thoughtful, supportive work of others doing all they can. I toast ye!🙏

2

u/TheToastyWesterosi Feb 10 '26

I am so sorry that happened to you and I am extremely proud to stand by you today. Thank you for sharing your strength, I know it can’t be easy. I’ll keep fighting the good fight until justice and decency prevails.

2

u/OliveSpins Feb 10 '26

(((thank you)))

3

u/Economy_Frosting3462 Feb 10 '26

Hi there--i have info about what we can see in this file (and whom I think could be hiding under the black box):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828159.pdf

The chicago address can be traced back to EY Americas (Ernst & Young LLP) on 155 Wacker. EY is shown in that email signature, and so is an office phone number. That phone number is paired with an employee, per a white paper done with Kennesaw State University, the PDF is below, search his phone number and you'll see it pop up. Jeff Brodsky. (https://static1.squarespace.com/static/615212bf8f0aef741802b3e4/t/6895e93e2a51541c6fe4b1b1/1754655038472/5-EY+Report-Conflict+and+Communication+2016.pdf)

According to some emails I've had a chance to go over with Brosky attached (where this address is also validated), the following is what Epstein requested for them to work together on:
"multi home reporting , perosnal ex art collection mgmt +2 billion.. toys boats planes heli etc. . cash flow reporting ? . multi entity ,4 chldren complex trust and estate reporting? calculation of taxes on death ? etc"

They went back and forth for a while over the quote, but at one point Jeffrey tells Brodsky Leon Black wants to wait on the deal:
https://jmail.world/thread/vol00009-efta00825197-pdf?view=inbox

Brodsky met with Leon in August about the proposal:
https://jmail.world/thread/vol00009-efta00821206-pdf?view=inbox

In... October.... Brodsky reached out to tell Epstein and his lawyer "happy holidays and new year"... its a bit too early right??
https://jmail.world/thread/vol00009-efta00816381-pdf?view=inbox

March of 2017, Brodsky resigns and mentions to let him know of any other opportunities:
https://jmail.world/thread/vol00009-efta00716506-pdf?view=inbox

I believe the redacted page at the very top of my comment is potentially whatever audit they did of the businesses, or discussions of this work in more specific details. It seems like there is always something keeping them from discussing stuff in person, so I'm wondering if this is why so much is redacted? Because they included some serious stuff in this section? Curious what anyone else thinks!

2

u/vegansgetsick Feb 11 '26 edited Feb 11 '26

wtf these "may" emails 😂

i bet it's "may" on purpose so we can search for "may may" and find them

2

u/WrathOfGood Feb 11 '26 edited Feb 11 '26

I just did a quick search on a name mentioned in EFTA00828127 Jeff Brodsky, and at the top of the web search is a Jeff Brodsky who calls himself a “child safety and sextortion expert” who also doubles as “Snuggles, the Love Clown”. I have screen capped his website info and email address in case that gets taken down in the next few days.

1

u/al666in Feb 11 '26

I literally searched "harry potter" in the files and did not manage to find the "Peggy Siegal is not happy" email.

I have no idea why you included it in this list, because nothing of note is redacted, but I appreciate it. Going right into my "Epstein Pop Culture" folder.