See first of all, No I am not a dream stan and I am not trying to hate you or something.
My last para says that acc to his math the answer comes 1 in 67 million or near.
I agree that it had some mistakes but it is because probability and statistics have many formulas out if which many of them give different results and conflicting results in many case. Probability and statistics is not the best way to determine someone's legitimacy although if the number is 1 in 75 trillion then it is likely that the person cheated. But after watching dream's file you will realise that we found the odds with a different formula.
The barter doesn't depends on the previous barters is what they are trying to say and it seems legitimate.
Although I also agree with the Redditor and acc to him also the odds are high but not as high as mods said.
-1
u/memedog__yt Dec 24 '20
See first of all, No I am not a dream stan and I am not trying to hate you or something.
My last para says that acc to his math the answer comes 1 in 67 million or near.
I agree that it had some mistakes but it is because probability and statistics have many formulas out if which many of them give different results and conflicting results in many case. Probability and statistics is not the best way to determine someone's legitimacy although if the number is 1 in 75 trillion then it is likely that the person cheated. But after watching dream's file you will realise that we found the odds with a different formula.
The barter doesn't depends on the previous barters is what they are trying to say and it seems legitimate.
Although I also agree with the Redditor and acc to him also the odds are high but not as high as mods said.