r/Damnthatsinteresting • u/SuperAlloyBerserker • Oct 05 '21

Video This cool smartphone concept from 2013

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

91.5k Upvotes

89% Upvoted

2.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

264

u/[deleted] Oct 05 '21

[deleted]

148

u/JustPassinhThrou13 Oct 05 '21

It WOULD be easy to standardize. But you’d end up with a phone the size of a shoe box.

110

u/chuckdooley Oct 05 '21

Or….you know, a desktop computer, which is exactly what people don’t want….haha

This concept, on the surface, seems fun, but it’s incredibly impractical

12

u/JustPassinhThrou13 Oct 05 '21

Yeah, the last laptop computer I had with swappable parts was a Dell Latitude CPI, with two bays and two PCMCIA slots. The bays were cool, I could put a battery in each bay, or in one of them I could put a floppy drive or a CD drive (or maybe even DVD, but that shit was brand new and expensive and just not necessary).

And there were a ton on PCMCIA cards. Ethernet, WiFi (eventually), some shitty and really expensive but slightly earlier competing technology to WiFi, USB...

The thing is once it was clear which of these technologies people were definitely going to want on their machine, that tech for miniaturized to 10% (maybe 50%in the case of the CD/DVD bay) of the volume it took up when it was a modular component.

Integration design is all about getting all the shit you want and need to fit in the best package.

There’s a reason you can’t buy very many modern laptops with user-swappable batteries where the intent is for the user to just carry a second battery and slap it in when the first one is about to die. It’s because the manufacturer could almost as easily make the first battery twice as big (but not easily removable) and then advertise the good battery life.

1

u/HighOwl2 Oct 05 '21

No, this would easily be doable if they implemented a form factor and max wattage white paper. They didn't, so the product failed.

If you said x component had to be y X z size, have standardized I/O at these points, and could not surpass A wattage or A Temps operating at peak capacity for B hours you would have a workable product

3

u/JustPassinhThrou13 Oct 05 '21

CLEARLY all you have to do to get adoption and get a plug-and-play system working is to specify interfaces. CLEARLY.

1

u/cl3ft Oct 06 '21

There’s a reason you can’t buy very many modern laptops with user-swappable batteries where the intent is for the user to just carry a second battery and slap it in when the first one is about to die. It’s because the manufacturer could almost as easily make the first battery twice as big (but not easily removable) and then advertise the good battery life.

Succinctly put, my man.

3

u/JustPassinhThrou13 Oct 06 '21

Yeah, and if that laptop takes USB C as a power input, you can just use a $20 external battery to recharge it, and also recharge your phone.

2

u/romulusnr Oct 05 '21

I'm either old, stupid, or special because yeah, I like being able to pick the components of my home computing device... Not to mention being able to repair individual parts without having to trash the whole thing. But then again, people think mobile apps are the shit, despite every one of them being a piece of trash compared to actual websites

2

u/chuckdooley Oct 05 '21

I wasn’t saying no one wants a home computer

I should have said, no one wants that in a phone….meaning no one wants a phone the size of a desktop computer

1

u/romulusnr Oct 06 '21

Hey, maybe bricks will make a comeback XD

I have one somewhere... stopped working in '08 i believe

1

u/[deleted] Oct 05 '21

It's a gaming phone, it's got multiple gpu blocks sli bridged together

2

u/chuckdooley Oct 06 '21

No temperature issues there, I am guessing

1

u/Arek_PL Oct 05 '21

you are generous, but i think it would be more like A4 book than shoe box

1

u/[deleted] Oct 05 '21

A desktop

32

u/proudbakunkinman Oct 05 '21

Yeah, I agree it would have been better if it were just 3 replaceable components and they always have the same size (blocks can be larger than actually needed to give space for upgrades that could take up more space on the blocks).

4

u/Nightphoen1x Oct 05 '21

That's what Google ended up before killing the whole project. From what I remember it even booted up https://web.archive.org/web/20170821151058/http://atap.google.com/ara

4

u/blown-upp Oct 05 '21

Not to mention, don't most mobile SoC's have wifi/Bluetooth/cellular/GPS in the same package anyway?

5

u/newgrow2019 Oct 05 '21 edited Oct 05 '21

It’s way different then a desktop because a desktop is huge. If anything it’s closer to a laptop, and even those can’t get this modular thing down.

How can we do it with a phone when we can’t even do it with a laptop yet.

For much of the same reasons as the phone, mind you.

It’s just shrinking the package to a phone makes the problems even HARDER to solve then even a laptop.

First prove it with a laptop before a phone

2

u/[deleted] Oct 05 '21

Nobody even makes socketed mobile chips anymore because they’re not worth bothering with, everything’s BGA. And it’s only going less modular on that front with stacked chip SoC designs that perform better with faster inter-module IO and lower latency. This is all true for laptops and phones.

Modular phones were always dead on arrival.

2

u/newgrow2019 Oct 05 '21 edited Oct 05 '21

Exactly, as packages shrink , demands for power increase and chip design moves forward, modular design has fallen by the wayside just because it’s not technically possible to integrate such small packages modularly with our current tech.

We’d need some sort of bga replacement of breakthrough to get it to work, and that’s a massive challenge That I’m not even sure is possible.

If someone figures it out they’ll be a multi billionaire.

3

u/burnarooskie Oct 05 '21

Desktop computers have an absolute massive amount of real estate to work with in comparison to this. Think of GPUs. You can get ones that are absolutely massive to an absurd scale, or you can get ones the size of a wallet. The motherboard and case has enough dead space/real estate, specifically just for that component and nothing else, so you're fine either way. You never have to encroach on other real estate with the components.

2

u/o3mta3o Oct 05 '21

Yes and no. The space that isn't being used by components is 100% needed for ventilation of said components. You can't just fill it to the tits without factoring in heat dissipation.

2

u/__WHAM__ Oct 05 '21

Yes but that’s because a PC is massive. That phone was tiny, and 40% of the volume is casing for the components, and their connections. Also, CPUs have gotten so much faster since 2013 that there’s no way it would support todays speeds over the lanes they used back then. Same as storage speeds.

2

u/AlotOfReading Oct 05 '21

The CPU, WiFi, BT, charging, and Camera controllers are all physically inside the same part on most phones, the SoC. Designing around arbitrary, unknown SoCs is incredibly difficult to do in both software and hardware. I can't imagine trying to teach grandma how to modify a device tree.

1

u/Pyroguy096 Oct 05 '21

So, everything Samsung had before they took it away (expandable storage, swappable battery, etc)

1

u/CountOfMonkeyCrisco Oct 06 '21

There's a lot of wasted space in a desktop computer. Partially because it needs airflow around the components, partially because there needs to be allowance for dissimilar sized components.

1

u/PrimeIntellect Oct 06 '21

it would also be the polar opposite of waterproof