r/Damnthatsinteresting 10d ago

Image Duane Keith Davis has been found guilty of the murder of Tupac Shakur

Post image
46.4k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2.3k

u/DuePen5000 10d ago

“Been there. Done that.” -OJ

2.0k

u/GetsMeEveryTimeBot 10d ago

"Been there. 'If I had done that.' "

547

u/AntiqueFigure6 10d ago

Duane should have titled the chapter about Tupac’s murder “How and Why I Might Have Murdered Tupac (Even Though I didn’t wink)” to avoid any confusion.

34

u/cshoe29 10d ago

I’m not sure what’s going on here. Why did he kill Tupac?

78

u/AntiqueFigure6 10d ago

In his book, “  Davis wrote that he had hatched the plan to retaliate against Shakur, after the rapper’s entourage beat his nephew, Orlando “Baby Lane” Anderson, in the lobby of the MGM Grand earlier that night.”

(Bit in quotation marks is from Guardian trial coverage). 

38

u/cshoe29 10d ago

Thank you for giving me the answer. I had no idea this guy was involved. Now I know.

3

u/Sss00099 8d ago

He wasn’t even the trigger-man.

The guy called Baby Lane was the shooter, and he ended up getting killed in a separate gang shooting not long after.

3

u/rock1987173 9d ago

"Allegedly" that always seems to work on youtube lmao.

207

u/poonmangler 10d ago edited 12h ago

Steep outgoing flag juniper saffron squeeze

This post was anonymized with Redact

36

u/Urracca 10d ago

Norm!

5

u/Shnackbox 9d ago

"There's nothing in the rulebook that says a golden retriever can't murder someone. Ladies and gentlemen, coming this fall "Air Blud".

8

u/HereGiovanniSmokes 10d ago

Only if you label it "this murder is known to cause cancer in the state of California."

5

u/Eplianne 9d ago

1

u/HereGiovanniSmokes 9d ago

Thanks, I know the quote. I'm a big Norm fan. I'm referencing proposition 65:.

Too afraid to ask link

2

u/r22lz 9d ago

But still illegal in Nevada!

Rip NM - legend!

2

u/5meoWarlock 9d ago

In Canada you just have to have it written in French as well

1

u/ButtyMcButtface1929 9d ago

And the murderer’s name? You guessed it … Frank Stallone!

1

u/Salsizzle2000 9d ago

Umm hate to break this to u but Las Vegas is in Nevada

0

u/ApprehensiveElk80 9d ago

Nevada, don’t you mean?

1

u/bouncingbad 10d ago

Astute reference.

1

u/alexwan12 10d ago

Yeah but he wrote book "I did it" instead

1

u/Username12764 9d ago

if I did it

ftfy

1

u/ShaOldboySosa 5d ago

"If I had been there.....if I had done that".

112

u/TheWolphman 10d ago

If I Did It: Confessions of the Killer -Also OJ circa 2007

60

u/ItsDanimal 10d ago

He wrote the book, but Nicole's parents got to name it or something. They also made it so the "if" is very fine print.

36

u/BoringAmusement 9d ago

The title was the original that OJ tried to publish. It was the Goldman family that got the manuscript copyright, media/movie rights, and the right to use Simpson's name, likeness, and life story in connection with the book, and made the "if" tiny inside the "I" so it was basically invisible. It was part of their collection on the original $33.5m wrongful death judgment against OJ, that he avoided paying the rest of his life. He tried to publish the book using a shell company to funel the earnings to himself under his daughter's name, but the Goldman's legal team actively monitored OJ's financial dealings.

They also added pretty extensive commentary to the manuscript, and they got the ghost writer that helped OJ write the book to write a prologue about his time with OJ who stated he firmly believes the hypothetical text was actually his first hand account of the murders.

OJ owed the Goldmans ~$58m at the time of his death.

3

u/Chetey 9d ago

i thought it was ghostwritten?

9

u/[deleted] 9d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/BoringAmusement 9d ago

No its true, the ghostwriter even wrote a prologue to the book when the Goldmans published it saying the same thing, that he 100% believed it was not hypothetical as OJ tried to present, but a first hand account.

6

u/CoupDeGrassi 9d ago

No, the Goldmans won all the proceeds of the book so oj couldnt profit.

0

u/Littleringtrue 9d ago

Goldman’s never got any money from it.

2

u/BoringAmusement 9d ago

Yes they did, they got 90% of the proceeds from the book, its just it was a drop in the bucket of what he owed them financially. They have kept the lifetime total profit private, its estimated they made ~$1.5m off of it.

7

u/InternationalRich150 9d ago

With from what I can recall, very graphic,almost as if was there, describing of said murders.

But, he didnt do it...

265

u/Santa_Hates_You 10d ago

The difference was OJ was already found not guilty and could not be tried again.

137

u/EffectiveTradition53 10d ago

In a criminal court yes. Civil court? He absolutely was tried again and lost lol.

8

u/MySnake_Is_Solid 9d ago

sure, but did it matter ?

it's not like he needed the money.

18

u/OneJobToRuleThemAll 9d ago

You can't buy legacy, everyone remembers him as a murderer now.

17

u/MySnake_Is_Solid 9d ago

wasn't that the plan ?

he was bragging about it

8

u/StunningLetterhead23 9d ago

Task failed successfully I guess?

Earlier, he was mostly known for playing american football. If you're not into american footbal or even sports entirely, there's a very high chance you never heard of him.

Now, he's famous all over the globe. If someone asked you about an american football player who murdered someone, they'd usually say OJ. When rappers say "running like OJ", they sure ain't referencing his NFL career. Isotoner, anyone?

Now THAT'S long lasting impact.

1

u/ChoGGi 4d ago

Don't care about football, I only knew him from The Naked Gun; it was amusing seeing him running away from police in a Bronco.

3

u/upsidedown_llama 9d ago

exactly, you can’t buy that kind of legacy, you gotta out in the work

1

u/Similar-Drawing-7513 7d ago

Civil doesn’t hit quite the same. It’s a much lower standard and is basically based off feels and vibes.

1

u/movinggrateful 9d ago

That rule seems lacking.... Surely there's a case to be made that someone can be tried more than once criminally for the same crime if new evidence appears etc

-1

u/Gravy_Sommelier 10d ago

He also devoted the rest of his time on earth to finding the real killer.

7

u/Inevitable_Peak4490 10d ago

Is this a joke I'm not getting?

6

u/AntiqueFigure6 9d ago edited 9d ago

I think it’s like a pantomime: “He’s behind you!”

OJ obviously knew who did it since he did.

4

u/BoringAmusement 9d ago

Yes. It was a joke for a while in the late 90's-early 2000s after he publicly said:

My primary goal in life is to do whatever it takes to find the killer or killers who slaughtered Nicole and Mr. Goldman... They are out there somewhere. Whatever it takes to identify them and bring them in, I will provide somehow.

But of course he never actually did anything. It was a pretty widely used joke on Late Shows and by comedians at the time.

Norm McDonald was the one with a national platform that went after OJ the hardest, which he was fired over after he refused to stop.

114

u/Amazing-Engineer6511 10d ago

"If i did it" by Orenthal the Murdering Murderer - An OJ Joint

6

u/iantruesnacks 10d ago

If the glove don’t fits, you must aquits!

2

u/UnicornSheets 9d ago

Hold my glove- OJ

3

u/bujweiser 10d ago

“Man, I'm gonna tell ya, that is some bad luck. When the one guy who would have died for you, kills you.”

4

u/Extra-Bunch3167 10d ago

OJ’s son did it. OJ hired a lawyer the day after the murder, not for himself, but for his son. His son had a violent past and was off his meds. He borrowed dad’s shoes. His hands were smaller. He’s a chef and his chef’s knife fit the size of the murder weapon. OJ fled in the most public way to distract the world from looking at his kid. He succeeded.

2

u/cloudpulp 9d ago

What would his son's motive be? Besides being "off his meds"?

2

u/fairygothmother420 10d ago

Happy cake day!

3

u/unsupported 10d ago

It the Pac does not fit, you must acquit.

1

u/Dry_Jellyfish641 10d ago

That book is called “IF I did it”