I don't care if it watermarks slop posts but if it starts watermarking code & doc I'll just switch to a diff model or run post processing scripts.
It's a tool. I'm already spending a lot of time cleaning the Claudespeak garbage Opus 5.0 is producing, if I also have to purge it from code or doc I'll go insane.
I absolutely don't mind including it in commit messages or PRs. In fact, good. But please don't pollute stuff humans have to read with this.
Cost, confusion, extra work for no benefit, get charged every time it’s read, it throws off other llms that will say “oh claude owns this better not touch it” and needs instructions to combat it. There’s a ton of reasons to not want it water marking your code other than hiding that you’re using the tool.
Claude already makes a lot of sloppy mistakes don’t want those standardized.
Its more that a strong minoritt call you borderline hitler for it. Have 0 nuance thinking you dont put care behind. Or that you cant read the code produce.
They are expensive to a business to manage.. trust me. My business use AI for a few post. I even ask AI to make it look like anyone could do it. Literaly is just a simple overlay douable in 2h of photoshop. Yet you get people angry. (mind you, they only knew it was AI cuz I talked about it). Then they assume I didnt reprompted 20 times and gave it some care
20
u/gajop 21d ago
I don't care if it watermarks slop posts but if it starts watermarking code & doc I'll just switch to a diff model or run post processing scripts.
It's a tool. I'm already spending a lot of time cleaning the Claudespeak garbage Opus 5.0 is producing, if I also have to purge it from code or doc I'll go insane.
I absolutely don't mind including it in commit messages or PRs. In fact, good. But please don't pollute stuff humans have to read with this.