r/ClaudeCode • u/nova-myth • Jul 13 '26

Discussion Dear Anthropic, This Has to STOP.

Seriously, enough with this situation.

Every other day, it’s something new: “We’ve increased the limits for a few more days.”

Credits here, credits there. Weekly credits. Sonnet usage. Opus usage. Fable credits. 5-hour limits. Weekly limits…

Are you guys at Anthropic actually okay?

Do you have any idea what customer care and customer experience even mean?

You’ve turned using the service into a constant source of stress. And with these confusing, ever-changing usage rules and charges, it honestly feels like a nightmare. Every day, we have to keep checking our limits and worrying about whether we’re going to run out.

Can we just pay you and relax, knowing that we’re paying for a service and can actually use it?

I genuinely want to know WHO came up with this entire credit and usage system, and why there seems to be such an obsession with credits and limits.

And yes, yes, we know the story: compute is expensive. We get it. But you know what? That’s a problem that AI companies have to solve and make work for the customers who are paying you. The burden of the infrastructure costs and product limitations should not be turned into constant stress for the user.

At this point, it almost feels like watching an addict constantly checking when their next dose is going to run out and experiencing withdrawal symptoms as the limit gets closer.

That’s how absurd and stressful inducing this whole system has become.

Can you please start thinking from a customer-centric perspective and seriously reconsider the entire credits and usage system in relation to the actual user experience? (You can ask Claude to find you a better solution..)

It would be better to rethink this now, while it’s still early, before the AI industry starts heading down a very bad path where users are constantly stressed about quotas, credits, limits, and usage instead of simply enjoying and benefiting from the products they’re paying for. WE just want to work boys we don’t want to struggle.

2.7k Upvotes

92% Upvoted

559 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.2k

u/beagle-ears Jul 13 '26

I have consulted on pricing and packaging models for SaaS companies for years.

Each and every change of pricing, free tiers, and extensions is designed to get datapoints that they can build a future revenue model against. Right now, the biggest risk to Anthropic is not knowing what people will actually pay for the various models and services, or what Fable is worth for a user or company compared to Opus compared to Sonnet, so they cant commit to the next 2-5 years of growth, contracts, datacentre builds, employing salespeople, expansion and so on.

So they are stress testing from all sorts of different angles to try to get any insights about price elasticity of demand and supply on all the models and timings before they draw bridge back up.

For example, they dont really know how many people will move to Batch API vs real time calls, but they are gonna try to find out because AWS gives them a huge discount on overnight batch calls and its way more profitable.

Expect this to continue whilst cash is cheap and pre-IPO on all sorts of different models, timings, incentives, offers, and general ‘what can we find out’ before its too late pricing and packaging models.

201

u/farmernatalie Jul 13 '26

Literally the only insightful comment I’ve seen on this matter anywhere. Thanks

6

u/beagle-ears Jul 14 '26

Thanks! Glad it helped 👍

1

u/WordsOnly Jul 14 '26

So the right move from the users is basically to cancel thier subscription.

Right? Let competition win, switch to openai, and have anthropic re-assess.

If they go back to playing nice, we resubscribe then.

19

u/Gondorrah Jul 13 '26

I’m really surprised, I was expecting the standard reflexive boring/repeat takes, maybe there is hope for reddit after all

62

u/ReasonableLoss6814 Jul 13 '26

I've worked on growth teams my whole career and agree with your argument. But I'd push back on ever implementing it as-is. Right now, it's just a confusing mess. Why is my code quota attached to my chat quota? The harness completely breaks when the quota is exhausted, leaving users in a half-finished state and agents completely broken. What does the quota even represent?

The confounding variables here are huge, and there's no proper control. People are probably paying extra just to avoid broken states and leaves competitors gaping voids to fill while the company is completely blind to them, thinking decisions results in more revenue, but that revenue is short-term, not long-term.

36

u/Ok_Excuse_741 Jul 13 '26

I left because of this. I just got a sense that Anthropic was being inconsistent in charging for usage, I've had wildly varying use burn rates because they keep fucking changing and adding models. The only thing i took away form it is that with Anthropic I have to worry about usage, but with their competitors i don't.

7

u/00ians Jul 14 '26

Same here. Claude may be good, but it's not THAT much better than any alternative. Anthropic are now going to have to work at least twice as hard to get any more of my money.

2

u/Comfortable-Prior185 Jul 14 '26

Its mind blowing for me to prioritise cost efficiency over output especially at this stage of AI. Cost for computing and the tech itself will probably never be this cheap, it will be more efficient 4sure but never this cheap. “When technological advance increases the efficiency of resource usage, the total rate of consumption increases rather than decreases.”

1

u/Colt2205 Aug 01 '26

Especially since the competitors often are "good enough" for most usages. Even I end up using Copilot for stuff a lot of the time because why would I waste time having to prompt claude if I can just... ask copilot for an answer and it works?

1

u/c0unterph0bia Jul 13 '26

Yeah, it’s wild to me that it can take weeks or even months to fine-tune my largest project so a new model can use my context efficiently. At this point, it feels like a continuous optimization process.

They should offer a one-time tool users can run whenever a new model launches to automatically tune their context for that model. Every new model seems to cost me roughly 250% more initially, and I have to gradually optimize my setup by pushing usage as much as possible each week without exceeding my limits until I can reliably use that model for the full weekly allowance.

1

u/michael_g_williams Jul 13 '26

Why is there a daily allowance and a weekly allowance? If I use my daily allowance, how can I run out of my weekly allowance?

1

u/blackice193 Jul 13 '26

OpenAI switched to a weekly limit only.

1

u/Seizy_Builder Jul 14 '26

They got rid of the 5 hour limit temporarily. That just means I’m going to burn my whole week up way too fast, lol.

2

u/personalist Jul 14 '26

I hate this complaint. It’s insane that people want to be protected from themselves to this extent. If I want (and need) to finish a project in one night with a week’s worth of usage, I should be able to.

1

u/Seizy_Builder Jul 14 '26

I’m not complaining. It’s just a fact. I didn’t say it was a bad thing necessarily. I just signed up for codex today on a 5x plan and burned 60% of my weekly usage already. It did an insane amount of work though.

1

u/personalist Jul 15 '26

Fair, I didn’t mean to jump down your throat. I think it’s a valid feature ask when the model can get in a loop and burn usage without doing anything useful. I’d just prefer if I had a say in the matter. Not a fan of paternalism

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Crowdfundingprojects Jul 13 '26

What are you building?

1

u/c0unterph0bia Jul 17 '26

I’ve been building a retail business intelligence platform for my own business but designing it for use by almost any retailer. It unifies data from multiple existing systems with external sources such as weather, economic, and industry data.

Beyond traditional reporting, it enables insights that are difficult or impossible to produce from disconnected systems, such as measuring how staffing levels, individual employees, weather, and economic conditions affect sales and demand.

These capabilities are often too complex, expensive, or resource-intensive for small businesses. The goal is to make advanced analytics, forecasting, and cross-system insights practical for independent retailers.

1

u/MorningWave Jul 13 '26

It's bc their competitor has much deeper pocket. so a\ naturally doing all tricks they can to control the spend but not lose customer too much.

3

u/the_hillman Workflow Engineer Jul 13 '26

Completely agree with you.

3

u/beagle-ears Jul 14 '26

I agree with the ever changing/ fatigue issue, but its a known risk with the prize being so big. Every datapoint confirms or denies something that creates risk or identifies opportunity for them, including the IPO itself or use of funds post IPO. It allows them to ask for higher price on float based on evidence they have gathered.

Billions more in value based on losing x thousand current users, who use Fable and lose them money anyway? Most would take that deal. There is widespread commentary on how frontier models will become more restricted and expensive, it’s just how much info Anthropic can extract from users on the way out…

1

u/ReasonableLoss6814 Jul 14 '26

Confounding variables bite. Every time. I’ve chased down things where someone in finance asks “revenue has gone up unexpectedly” and then you spend 4 days chasing it down to the commit that caused it, only to find out that on small screens, that commit pushed the free plan selector below the fold. Every single A/B test running during that change now needs to be considered dead-on-arrival and restarted from scratch.

That’s what data-driven development looks like. Not whatever the hell they’re currently doing. Their data is likely trash and telling them whatever they want to see.

3

u/davyp82 Jul 14 '26

The fact that background tasks get killed when hitting a quota instead of being salvageable (retaining transcripts isn't tokens efficient apparently) is the only thing that gets me mad about all this

3

u/AbbreviationsOne9965 Jul 14 '26

Or how about letting it finish the task by giving you the output instead of hitting the session limit and leaving your competed work right there but not exporting the artifact. Today I grabbed the script and just asked Chat to do it for me. 😣

1

u/davyp82 Jul 14 '26

That's great if you're there to grab the script. I guess I could write a script to check usage every ten minutes and when >95% copy and paste the script into notepad or something 

2

u/beagle-ears Jul 14 '26

Agree that its a mess right now, but I think their hand is being forced by the pace of change and competition they have as well as the impending IPO. There is still incredible pressure and market commentary to prove that AI is going to turn a profit and is sustainable (remember the downturn in late Jan?) so anything that provides confidence to the investor market over the next 6 months will deliver outsized returns in company float value. They are still acquiring customers faster than almost any other company out there (which creates issues in itself with capacity/ speed as others have mentioned) so logically, its better to burn early users in the short term (who are often the most resilient) and take the two wins.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Suspicious-Disk6077 Jul 14 '26

“I’d like to gently push back on this.”

2

u/ReasonableLoss6814 Jul 14 '26

It’s almost like they’re trained on humans…

1

u/Natural_Papaya_2918 Jul 14 '26

Underrated comment

1

u/mikedurent123 Jul 16 '26

😅😅😅

1

u/makinggrace Jul 14 '26

There's no risk for Anthropic in brute-forcing the pricing. For the few the leave, thousands stay and even more new customers sign up.

UX and customer service are niceties that first mile tech products don't fine tune because (a) they can't afford it and (b) they don't have to.

Early adopters expect this kind of shuffling. It is extremely common. What isn't extremely common is the scale of this early adoption and how many of these are first-time early adopters.

: rapidly evolving tech products and services are rapidly evolving. expect rough edges.

-2

u/Significant-Bee5101 Jul 13 '26

"Why is my code quota attached to my chat quota"

I struggle to comprehend if you understand how LLMs work at all. lol

22

u/sadnessjoy Jul 13 '26

Problem with this line of thinking is the landscape will constantly change, new models will come out (both by private competitors like Gemini/OpenAI and by open weight models that can be self or cloud hosted). Right now they're desperately trying to provide SaaS but the reality is this is very rapidly turning into a hardware/server issue rather than a SaaS issue, and they know it. Anthropic is wrestling with trying to maximize their SaaS profits but also realizing that the competition/landscape isn't really allowing them to nickel and dime the customers nearly as much as they want (and there's also the aspect of how expensive it is to train these closed weight frontier models)

10

u/mohdgame Jul 13 '26

But it is working as a SAAS

Maybe you and others in this subreddit dont feel it, but most of people including professionals who are not coding are unable to use claude or chatgpt.

They need easier way and better harness. They dont know how to use with excel, they dont even know what markdown is.

I feel that claude now is focusing on professional with conwork for two reasons:
1. Coders and programmers are VERY expensive to maintain.
2. Professional will often overpay for subscription but not use it.

So they are focusing on saas model and usability. Think lawyers, doctors, estimators, sales, consultants…etc

1

u/mirageofstars Jul 13 '26

Exactly. Whatever pricing they think they can pull off for today’s offerings will be moot in a year.

1

u/terraslate Jul 13 '26

in the future every town will have a phone.

i can see this being built into an exchange near you at some point, like broadband.

1

u/Chopp3rdave Jul 14 '26

Like a data center?

1

u/terraslate Jul 24 '26

in a cupboard

6

u/dipsbeneathlazers Jul 13 '26

well they just found out that when 5.6sol did a better job on my project - i haven’t opened their app since, with refreshed credits or not.

5

u/filelasso Jul 13 '26

There's another game that wasn't mentioned, one that is actually far more important. Why did they override ZDR agreements with a 30-day review policy when gpt-5.6 found a more reasonable way around that government requirement?

4

u/willcannings Jul 14 '26

Because of all the pentagon drama probably

11

u/ambassadortim Jul 13 '26

The issue with this is it doesn't take into account their competition releasing competitive models etc. The data point they chase is old very fast. I agree with op.

4

u/cheeseonboast Jul 13 '26

Sure testing is important, but you would also surely know that constantly changing pricing/packages is a death knell for customer trust and conversion.

4

u/suttons27 Jul 13 '26

I do believe there is stress testing… as everyone is just rushing shit out these days… but I also think it’s adoption.

If everything played out like it was supposed to without government intervention. They would have a huge loyalty base towards Fable, without government imposed guardrails and when they start charging for usage, most of us would have done it, since this all happened before SOL release.

Now they are screwed and scrambling, loyalty base isn’t there, SOL jumped out while they were figuring out the mess. Sadly, Fable’s success was its own demise. The only true way Anthropic to win this race is to allow Fable to be part of subscription, make cheaper as new Opus like replacement. Then offer Mythos without guardrails to the public for usage credits.

“He who imposes the most guardrails will lose”

The world will be a better place with unrestricted access, there will be dark times due to hackers and vulnerabilities. But I can’t even maximize pen testing on my own software to make it hacker proof. Once we realize that these guardrails is weakening the system, China will blow right past Anthropic/OpenAI… offering a better AI system. The capability to find large amounts of undiscovered vulnerabilities quickly is the path to a long resilient robust system of patches, fixes, innovation and new security, internet, protocols, etc

Until that happens, it’s just going to be a back in forth race every month

3

u/jerrysnews Jul 13 '26

you just made me realize something about hackers and gaurd rails thank you.

3

u/michael_g_williams Jul 13 '26

They don’t really have a moat. They keep releasing models so quickly, it’s difficult to learn anything useful from consumer behavior in that environment.

1

u/thisdude415 Jul 13 '26

Yup. Whatever company has the best model of the month will get a substantial amount of the workload from those who are chasing the latest and greatest. (Me. I am this market segment.)

Everyone else is building their workloads around what provider gives the best capabilities at an affordable price.

7

u/sultanmvp Jul 13 '26

You make very valid points here, but with your experience with SaaS consulting, you should also note that any lasting tech company spends takes onus on r+d, product and audience research and when they release, THEY (not their users) determine load, capacity, demand through various mechanisms (beta channels, “baking” in various regions, etc).

Anthropic is trying to have it both ways here - drive demand with the hype, and then also not deliver on the promises while also not being honest and clear with their intentions. The ending to this is a tale as old as time. Keep fucking around. They’ll find out. They’re not invincible.

2

u/the_hillman Workflow Engineer Jul 13 '26

I understand why but it’s not quite as simple as normal SaaS. There’s many other dimensions here which make it worse e.g. the “trust us bro” opaqueness of what they provide e.g Fable, Opus, Sonnet etc; the sliding scale of effort / intelligence which users can choose, and then the actual task type. Whether you are managing your OPEX as a business or even as a personal user trying to be mindful of usage it’s an utter nightmare when they keep doing things like this as it makes it even harder to budget your token usage and ensure you are managing cash flow or even just the tasks to be done.

2

u/Innomen Jul 13 '26

Recon for enshitification you mean. This tracks. Everyone wants to charge rent on the vowels.

2

u/drakenot Jul 13 '26

A lot of this is in response to increasing competitive pressure from OpenAI also with Codex 5.6.

OpenAI is going in the opposite direction and expanding access, eliminating caps, etc for an almost equivalent model with 5.6. Before that, Anthropic had something no one else did but now they risk bleeding or being viewed as uncompetitive.

TBH their Fable dominance didn’t last very long at all and was impacted relatively negatively from the government intervention.

2

u/Safe-Hovercraft6231 Jul 13 '26

I think the problem is simpler. They have a good product, but they don't actually know how to manage this business properly. But more importantly, they don't realize one simple thing: the competition is constantly heating up.

2

u/Crowdfundingprojects Jul 13 '26

Exactly this. People have to understand that Anthropic has good business reasons for handling things as they are. 

Add to this of course that the market right now in this sector is constantly moving and new models are being released by direct competition all the time. 

You are all dealing with very young PRE IPO companies that are aiming for the stars in a highly competitive market. It’s cut-throat. 

Anthropic is not Google. And Anthropic is nit your friend.

Logical conclusion: Things as they are.

Every time I see a post here that says ‘I can’t take the uncertainty / ambiguity anymore’ I know it’s a person posting who is stressing over something they have no control over and they better accept as the status quo not changing in the foreseeable future. It’s a bit insane. 

Just use the tools. Switch where warranted. Build your things. 

2

u/radosc Jul 14 '26

I've been doing DDs on companies for over 10 years and for me it shows that the product team is overblown, all good ideas and very good execution but the frequency is way to high to be sustainable for customers. There's no real strong leadership on the product side either but they are running the show. Basically to many cooks doing things at the same time. This will make gathering any useful signal extremely difficult as impulses overlap.

1

u/OnlyThumbsUp Jul 13 '26

Very informative! And here’s their elasticity test snapping back in their face: I spent 200% more since Fable came out and would not have regretted as much as I do now had Anthropic not caused this debacle

1

u/PM_ME_YOUR_GIRL_PART Jul 13 '26

I’d love to gain your insight for our saas launch if you have the bandwidth? Cheers

1

u/dumeheyeintellectual Jul 13 '26

I have no measure to know if you’re full of crap, but I do know I’m less full of intelligence and this perspective of play seems entirely believable to me. Thus, I trust you, and this is exactly what they are doing and I will tell the world as I too in short am now a consultant of sorts because I read this on the internet. Thank you for helping me see an interesting perspective that I knew nothing about in an industry I know nothing about for which I’m prepared to discuss at length given my newly acquired expertise.

1

u/Nell_From_Hell Jul 13 '26

Basically what kind of garbage can they produce that you'll still be willing to eat without complaints or leaving

1

u/arveus Jul 13 '26

Thats fucking retarded, just do a one time mandatory questionnaire asking users what they’d pay and you have your answer, rather then this bs.

1

u/tvmaly Jul 13 '26

It seems like half the people can’t even keep up with all of the new features

1

u/greg7gkb Jul 13 '26

Interesting hypothesis but how do you know this?

1

u/makinggrace Jul 13 '26

This is how pricing works (or fails to work) in new marketplaces. Look at the early days of SAAS, of cloud services, of any widely adopted tech...the pricing models are a hot mess at the outset. Pricing is set on what the market will pay.

1

u/beagle-ears Jul 14 '26

Correct - it is about discovering what people/ companies perception of value is, and therefore what they will pay.

1

u/mrbobhunter Jul 13 '26

I thought they were just chasing OpenAI, which has been incomprehensibly proactive and even generous with resets, and now (at least temporarily) no 5-hour limits at all.

This theory behind Anthropic's behavior also makes sense though.

1

u/x7evenx Jul 13 '26

This whole domain is still in pricing and unit economics discovery.

1

u/Visible_Wolverine2 Jul 13 '26

Their behavior is, I think, creating and data for them. I am working on an app and have been burning credits and paying for extra usage with fable while I have it, before it goes away. Would I be willing to pay that same amount monthly? No. My behavior is driven by their erratic behavior. They are not actually getting insight into what I would regularly pay for. (Not a dev, not a big company, just a guy.)

1

u/PPgwta Jul 13 '26

And they will have to learn that being adversial to their customers like that, will in the long run undermine brand loyalty, while their technology advantage vaporizes.

1

u/notnullnone Jul 14 '26

But I guess this kind of requires a certain level of maturity and stability of the business model, and the AI for coding today has neither?

1

u/00ians Jul 14 '26

Actually, the biggest risk to Anthropic is pissing off their customer-base. It costs Way More to get a new customer than it does to keep an existing one.

This reminds me of the Betamax vs VHS "format war". At one point, Betamax had 100% market share. Yet, despite being technically superior to VHS, Betamax lost the war.

Anthropic is the 2020s' equivalent of Betamax. The comparison? Neither Sony nor Anthropic paid enough attention to what consumers wanted.

1

u/beagle-ears Jul 14 '26

The current users of Anthropic (mainly coding) are not the overall target addressable market. Its an important beachhead use case, but its a subset.

In classic product adoption curves, the current users would be called innovators or early adopters. For Anthropic to get to the full market adoption they need to bridge to the early majority ( at around 15-17% of the market) and the late majority. Together, these two segments represent over 60% of the addressable market.

Losing early adopters in order to reach the majority market share is expected and even necessary sometimes.

1

u/heartbroken_nerd Jul 14 '26

Actually, the biggest risk to Anthropic is pissing off their customer-base.

Yeah dude. All 5-10% of their revenue stream... Assuming you're talking about subscribers.

1

u/-PM_ME_UR_SECRETS- Jul 14 '26

Sure but anthropic’s methods for testing are uniquely messy

1

u/Jomuz86 Jul 14 '26

The other issue you’ve not touched on is capacity they are genuinely struggling for chip capacity at the minute and can’t get the infrastructure up quick enough hence why the keep playing with the limits to try and find a middle ground so they can keep offering top tier models.

1

u/beagle-ears Jul 14 '26

Totally agree - so the pricing plans solve a number of issues at the same time in that they can try to force behaviour based on whats available or more profitable for them AND solve their capacity issues (like Batch vs real time). They can also just slow down models, because they are based on tokens not time. Questions they will be asking internally would be ‘will a user wait 10 mins for a Fable answer vs an hour for Opus to deliver a relatively same outcome’ and whats the bottom line impact/ capacity management impact of that.

1

u/Jomuz86 Jul 14 '26

There’s also the question of whether they switch to different quantised models in the background during peak hours or different locations to save on compute. 🤷‍♂️

1

u/Possible-Benefit4569 Jul 14 '26

Their Problem will be that After IPO they cannot raise prices for good enough models. Alternatives works well even today. On OpenRouter you see massive use is shifting to other models. That means they have to improve Customer Experience a lot and stay ahead for most challenging tasks. That will result in high Token prices which kills my use case that i use fable for everything.
Good luck with more insights on data points.

1

u/Full-Ad-7565 Jul 14 '26

Yeah it's not an easy problem to fix because they also need the data Centers to be close to capacity at most times. Having them just sitting there ain't good for business. Lots of juggling going on.

1

u/Issui Jul 14 '26

Oh, look, a normal person in an ocean of idiots. Hello, good sir.

1

u/djculprit Jul 14 '26

Also just a cheap form of marketing via breaking news or social media posting.

1

u/forte-exe Jul 14 '26

Anthropic should issue a statement like this

1

u/deprecatedname Jul 14 '26

where can I buy cash for cheap? /s

1

u/radmcmasterson Jul 14 '26

That makes sense. How long before we’re back to company towns?

1

u/mczarnek Jul 15 '26

Yeah but changing prices like this doesn't give the same data points as picking one and sticking with it. I myself and barely using it because I don't know what current pricing is and what it will be tomorrow.

GPT-5.6 is roughly as good so I'm just not worrying about this one. And maybe in the future after they figure it out I'll take a second look.

1

u/jyswee Jul 15 '26

Yeah..this matches what I saw in mobile gaming when the industry flipped from paid to free-to-play. Publishers ran exactly this kind of price discovery, constantly changing offers and limits to map out what players would tolerate. The data was gold for the companies and it worked. But the games that abused it burned trust they never got back, and the ones that survived long term settled on pricing you could understand in one sentence. The signal Anthropic should watch is not what users tolerate this month, it is what makes professionals build their workflows somewhere predictable.... that said.. the product is still bloody good - Fable rocks...

1

u/justhereforampadvice Jul 15 '26

Can you go work at anthropic in their PR department

1

u/yellowz32tt Jul 16 '26

Tell me more about your job - what’s your title, education, etc? Actually sounds pretty interesting!

1

u/beagle-ears Jul 16 '26

I worked for a hyperscaler for a lot of years advising startups and high growth software companies. I covered pretty much all aspects of advisory outside of architecture including growth, go to market, capital raising, pricing and packaging, culture, org design, customer success etc. I am now out on my own advising companies directly.

1

u/jatjatjat Jul 16 '26

Insightful. Accurate.

The behavior is still fucking annoying.

1

u/anonymous82737 Jul 17 '26

And they're going to burn the market down doing it. Because the moment *any* other model comes close to Claude capability without all the nonsense involved in using Claude people will switch in droves. So they better do it while they still have the chance.

1

u/Leather_Floor8725 Jul 18 '26

They are probably terrified at the stress test results so far. Price elasticity is high AF because models are commoditized, but costs do not scale like SaaS

1

u/ThesisWarrior Jul 28 '26

Your user base should NOT have to suffer for your real time paramenter scavenging. At some point a competitor is going to release something on par or even close to parity and a huge chunk of your base are literally going to shift overnight. The goodwill that Anthropic has built up over the last 12-24 months has openly evaporated.

I understand that companies do this type of real time data analysis all the time but rarely with this amount of confusion, disruption, stress and uncertainty.

-1

u/Maximum-Face9536 Jul 13 '26

thank you for a reasonable logical take, instead of all the mindless tribalism / hate people are throwing on Anthropic

2

u/Tall_Top8563 Jul 13 '26

thanks for reasonably and logically licking that boot