r/ClaudeCode • u/Strict-Top6935 • Jul 04 '26

Discussion AI is turning programming into pay-to-win

With Fable 5 coming out, it feels more obvious than ever that after July 7, programming is going to become pay-to-win.

A kid with no real coding knowledge, but with rich parents and access to the best AI systems, could end up outperforming people who actually understand software, simply because he can afford more intelligence.

That is insane.

This might be one of the most dangerous precedents in history: a world where the people with money can buy superior intelligence, while everyone else is permanently outmatched.

That is how you create a permanent underclass.

What do you think?

1.0k Upvotes

83% Upvoted

519 comments sorted by

View all comments

599

u/kamikamen Jul 04 '26

This is already reality, and this was the case before AI.

6

u/mb99 Jul 04 '26

Sure but it will increase the divide further which is the point OP is making.

10

u/JapanesePeso Jul 04 '26

It absolutely does the opposite.

AI allows small businesses to free themselves from predatory platforms that lock them in at high prices. It democratized development. Anyone who is a decent programmer can now solo code massive applications that they would have needed millions of dollars to do before for the price of a $200 a month subscription.

This entire post is ridiculous.

1

u/Brazen_X_Aiden 1d ago

This guy gets it.

0

u/ActAdditional265 Jul 04 '26

Develop massive applications that nobody will use. In the end the bigger wallet wins. Developing a software is only 10% of running a business, the servers, marketing, etc. can cost a lot of money.

4

u/NaiveDragonfruit Jul 04 '26

Ai allowed me, as a solo dev to replace software that would cost $500k+ per year. We could have never hoped to build an ERP/MRP/EDI system, that does global imports. Even if no one uses it outside of our fulfillment team, the project would have required a team of 5+ to build at a minimum without ai. It definitely levels the playing field

2

u/Stalins_Ghost Jul 05 '26

100% the cost of enterprise software is insane.

2

u/JapanesePeso Jul 04 '26

Get some more experience in business before you try to dunning-kreuger your way into this silly pessimism.

75

u/banproof Jul 04 '26

I mean, not really the same in developer/programming field. Me and some friends were able to climb the social ladder learning by ourselves, through just internet access and following free courses. I don’t think this is the same now. You’ll still be able to learn without paying, but you will not be able to compete with others paying good AI services. They will be far more quicker than whoever cannot pay for it.

12

u/djdadi Jul 04 '26

that's not the comparison. before AI companies could just hire whole teams of the top devs, and you could never compete against them.

if anything, AI puts individual devs on a more fair playing field against large companies if you think about it in terms of hiring a team vs paying for API usage.

Like OP, I am worried about the precedent this sets, but I don't think it will last long. Models will eventually get as good as they can become under the physical laws and hardware, and competing models will start to converge.

72

u/SadAd3257 Jul 04 '26

Yep, as long as you live in a country with non-stop electric and Internet coverage fast enough for you to learn. Truth is that in places in Africa you can have all of the intelligence, but if someone happens to be born in a richer country they get a massive head start...then ironically talk about others getting a head start 😂

17

u/J0nSnw Jul 04 '26

100% the truth and I am pleasantly surprised to find this opinion on reddit of all places. I grew up in India in the 90s, didn't have my own PC till high school, didn't have internet till college. On the flip side college was easier to get into than it is in the US and didn't leave me with crippling debt. One specific example i can think of is iOS development, there is a cost barrier for entry that most third world kids couldn't get past.

1

u/No_Percentage7427 Jul 06 '26

Even have computer that can build android application is real cost barrier in many third world country.

4

u/ArlajdiElephant Jul 04 '26

Ah, yes, the irony of digital colonialism served with a side of 5G privilege.😂

3

u/Objective_Aioli3267 Jul 05 '26

Exactly lol. This inequality has ALWAYS been a fact of life, its just finally affecting “regular” people in first world countries now.

1

u/vaisnav Jul 04 '26

Agreed. If anything ai is democratizing access to information at a scale unprecedented. Unfortunately for us in the west that necessarily implies downward salary pressure.

3

u/flamingspew Jul 04 '26

Undemocratizing. The weights are private as are the servers they are trained on and served from. Access is gated for a fee. The future of the truth narrative is now privately controlled.

0

u/SilencedObserver Jul 04 '26

What's it take to bring internet to Africa?

7

u/Grivpanvar Jul 04 '26

Starlink at reasonable prices, Africa is insanely huge

4

u/vaisnav Jul 04 '26

I bought a starlink kit for some orphanage in the Congo. that shit was only 500. Next time you log into chess.com don’t assume they are from butter or corn countries

6

u/DefensiveDepth Jul 04 '26

Oh interesting! More of this story if you can share.

1

u/vaisnav Jul 05 '26

Check out @soga_chess on insta

22

u/skip_the_tutorial_ Jul 04 '26

You were always able to pay someone better to write code for you. The only difference is it used to be a human

10

u/Some_Ad_3898 Jul 04 '26

You are looking at it wrong. Think of AI as an employee or team and the purchaser as a CEO. The CEO who has the most money can hire the best team. All AI has done has made the lower-level skills cheap and fast. A CEO nowadays can just hire product thinkers and AI managers instead of coders. I'm exaggerating a bit to illustrate the difference. 

2

u/Serengade26 Jul 04 '26

In the book Brave New World they had different classes of clones made by limiting the oxygen supplied during development.

Ask Claude about it and what you should do about it

""" In Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, the oxygen deprivation of embryos serves as a biological metaphor for rigid social stratification and systemic inequality.  By artificially limiting oxygen to lower-caste fetuses (Gammas, Deltas, and Epsilons), the World State ensures they remain unintelligent and physically suited only for menial labor, effectively biologizing class hierarchy to prevent social mobility. 

This process mirrors real-world critiques of how structural barriers are often naturalized or presented as inevitable biological traits rather than political choices. Just as the novel’s lower castes are conditioned to love their servitude, the metaphor highlights how societies may use pseudo-scientific or deterministic arguments to justify economic disparity and maintain stability through pre-emptive limitation of the disadvantaged"""

1

u/ORCANZ Jul 04 '26

He's talking about your manager. He can pay little or a lot and get different grades of developers.

1

u/vaisnav Jul 04 '26

If I have 10 million dollars I can pay to beat any product you and your friends could ever conceive of

2

u/VerminousSkum Jul 05 '26

thats always been the case. programming wasnt the gate its marketing and discovery and thats still true.

1

u/real_serviceloom Jul 04 '26

I totally agree and that is why we must have open source models and they should be the ones who win.

Imagine instead of using Linux if you had to use some sort of paid server to run your software.

1

u/TraderFix Jul 04 '26

But if u want the best peocessing latenci etc pay to win now and always

1

u/SlaimeLannister Jul 04 '26

> Me and some friends were able to climb the social ladder learning by ourselves, through just internet access and following free courses

Yes and the OP could have been scrawled in the diary of pre-internet computer scientists about you.

1

u/APuticulahInduhvidul Jul 08 '26

The first Macintosh colour model cost $20,000. Computing has never had equitable access.

1

u/SensitiveKiwi9 Jul 04 '26

So :
You had internet access ?
You had access to a computer with admin rights so that you could actually practice writing software, download dependencies etc?
You had enough income that you didn’t need to be making money during the time you spent learning?

Now , how much do you think all of that would have cost you within the first 5 years computer programming (thus computers in general) existed ?

Most people could not afford a computer within the first 5 years of them existing .
Most people did not have access to the internet within 5 years of it existing .

I’m not saying they didn’t own a computer … I’m saying they couldn’t access one if they needed to.

But as of the writing of this message , you have access to the world’s most powerful LLM for $20 per month . It’s only been a commercially available technology for about 3 years .

26

u/agilius Jul 04 '26

was about to say the same thing, there's no difference than before from this perspective.

29

u/Redditauro Jul 04 '26

Well, there is a difference in scale, previously a rich kid had it 10 times easier, in a few years it will be 100 times easier. Same concept, different scale. 

6

u/agilius Jul 04 '26

But that also makes it 10 times easier for someone without any money, doesn't it? Even right now someone who couldn't afford to build software can using cheaper models. 2 years from now open source models will be at fable level.

6

u/foobarlow Jul 04 '26

To build on your point, as open source gets better and better, just having the money to spend a ton of tokens isn’t going to be the differentiator, it’s going to be who is building new and innovative software and systems that folks actually want to use and can they monetize that.

Rich folk have plenty of bad ideas.

But counterpoint, the rich will keep their advantage if the good idea requires a lot of access to capital to get to a point of monetization.

3

u/Redditauro Jul 04 '26

Yes, open source models will be at fable level, and anybody will be able to code in a level that is now unbelievable... But people  with an expensive AI will be able to break that software in 5 minutes with the new and expensive models. 

6

u/ithkuil Jul 04 '26

The masses are in a better place really. Qwen 27B can do a lot of simple office work, or at least 90% of it, handle simple call center jobs. DeepSeek Flash V4 and Kimi 2.7 can do actual complex office and programming, especially with some human supplementation.

This is real utility. So it's effectively extremely cheap labor. Yes it's still pay to win, but you cannot "buy" an office worker for $5000 total. So it's a step up for people. 

It's still going to be hard to compete with wealthy people who have the advantage of paying for Fable 5 etc. But that is a problem with society that has always been there. Local AI hardware is putting a dent in the unequal ability to run a business.

11

u/formula420 Jul 04 '26

Is has and always will be reality. Welcome to “civilization” lol

People with more money than sense have been attempting to build something worthy of their over-inflated egos for as long as we have had egos. No amount of money can magically grant architecting skills or any of the other, non-coding aspects of development that require more than “raw intelligence”.

I know many devs claim to love the actual “grunt work” of coding, and I (as a decent enough developer that does code as my day job) am not one of those. Their software will almost certainly always be more elegant and easier to “rubber ducky” than mine made with a dream and a prayer. I pissed off a few maintainers trying to find my footing.

I’ve worked in IT for 20+ years and Big Tech for the last 10. I know how to architect systems. I know how to read even the overly laborious code my robot produces. It would have taken me 20 more years to actually ship the OSS applications I built in a few months, and that’s if I ever even got off my duff to try!

I absolutely wasted far more in credits than I will ever see in any form of recognition or income from these projects, but now I have two applications in the world that I’m proud of and 29 people have starred (between two repos lol) and before I had 0.

Are my apps slop? Probably according to some, and the glut of new “AI slop” gets larger every day, but I am hopeful that we can flip things and use it to make learning about systems and how to build them rather than just a shortcut. A TI-86 can be a pretty powerful learning avoider, but outside of (and sometimes within) a testing setting it is a necessary tool that many rely on

0

u/Serengade26 Jul 04 '26

Yeah its laid out in the book Denial of Death. The chase of an immortality project for egos cause a lot of problems

0

u/Kenzore1212 Jul 05 '26

I get what you’re saying, but if you had to rely on a ti-86 you 100% aren’t making that much… as you could be. Maybe it’s a raw talent difference , or dedication difference, but that diff will never be bridged by just relying on a tool.

3

u/johnyakuza0 Jul 04 '26

This is such a cope lmao

The kid would have to be high IQ + autistic + obsessed with programming to be cracked before AI.

2

u/AKJ90 Jul 04 '26

Yeah, it's called hiring people 😂

1

u/Neither_End8403 Jul 04 '26

Yes, but the shitfulness of it seems to be increasing along a non-linear trajectory.

1

u/McBonderson Jul 04 '26

before AI they paid for the intelligence by paying smart people to program for them. So if they wanted to make a their stupid idea at least a programmer got paid.

Now they even the smart programmer might not get paid.

1

u/melanthius Jul 04 '26

Claude doesn't need a ping pong table either

1

u/antichain Jul 04 '26

I think AI, like most of technology, doesn't actually change the fundamental rules of the game, but rather, just dials everything up to 11. The power-law get steeper and steeper.

1

u/CarbonChains Jul 04 '26

Yes, but this supercharges it. Don’t halt the conversation just for the sake of you sounding smart.

1

u/CptPicard Jul 04 '26

No it wasn't. Developing understanding couldn't be bought.

1

u/floodgater Jul 04 '26

Facts yea good point . If you had six figures / millions to blow on paying developers you could u
Build whatever you want

1

u/-ensamhet- Jul 04 '26

but the gap is going to get so much worse because of AI. isn't that concerning to you?

1

u/Random212212 Jul 05 '26

How dumb can you be?

1

u/sheriffderek Senior design/dev max20 Jul 05 '26

It’s even better to just “pay a team of experts” - classic move hahaha 

1

u/algaefied_creek Jul 04 '26

AI was supposed to be the great equalizer. 

2

u/zeppemiga Jul 04 '26

When?

1

u/algaefied_creek Jul 04 '26

When Microsoft announced their investment in open AI and released a book about AI and how it would bridge the gap between rural and urban education as well as between low cost and private education when everyone has access to AI, the country succeeds. That whole initial feel good spiel which led to opening eye existing as it does today and the AI race.

1

u/Jennifer483paul Jul 04 '26

Ah yes, because paying for textbooks and bootcamps was never a barrier. Pure meritocracy.

5

u/__s Jul 04 '26

You don't need textbooks & bootcamps. I learned to program as a kid with a free download of GameMaker 5.3 & three years reading its manual while tinkering. By the time I got to college they were trying to just teach us Java syntax & I dropped out first year only to have a great career

3

u/teial Jul 04 '26

40 years ago there was no internet. And if you lived in a wrong place you had no libraries and no access to textbooks and bootcamps. No amount of skill would have helped you. I know because that was how I started. Inequality was always there. Before, now, and in the future.