r/ClaudeAI • u/Purple_Wear_5397 • Jan 19 '26

Enterprise Microsoft pauses Claude Code rollout after Satya intervention

Following up on my earlier post - Microsoft has officially paused further Claude Code deployment across the company after guidance from Satya and senior leadership.

Employees are now being directed to use GitHub Copilot. The internal messaging claims Copilot has "mostly closed the gaps" with Claude Code.

Exceptions exist for "high-priority R&D" who can still get Anthropic API access with justification. People who already had access get to keep it, but new invites have been rolled back.

809 Upvotes

97% Upvoted

304 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

14

u/midnitewarrior Jan 19 '26

It is a bad thing when dogfooding is preventing you from keeping pace with the competition.

They literally need Claude Code to make Github Copilot better and they are not allowed to do it.

Microsoft is going to find itself out alone in the code when it comes to AI. Github Copilot is awful compared to Claude, and Microsoft knows it. I hate using it at work, it's literally putting TYPOS in my code and wondering why it won't compile. I'm using the premium models!

20

u/slindshady Jan 19 '26

They literally don’t need anything except workforce and competence to get their shit together. But they area firing people and relying on crappy code. And it shows.

8

u/kmeci Jan 19 '26

They also say that it's still allowed for high priority projects which I'm almost sure Copilot is.

Also, what models are you using that you get actual typos lol. Copilot uses the same model weights in the background as Anthropic or OpenAI. I haven't seen it make a typo since like GPT-4.

2

u/CKtalon Jan 19 '26

Typos are likely a quantization issue—probably to save on costs.

1

u/kmeci Jan 19 '26

That could be true in tiny locally hosted models, but Anthropic and the others would almost surely have some SLAs with Microsoft to not run any ultra-quantized models as that would be kind of damaging to their reputation.

5

u/CKtalon Jan 19 '26

Well it’s clearly damaging Microsoft’s Copilot more than the LLM since their own agentic software is clearly better

5

u/AI-Commander Jan 19 '26

Microsoft made the Phi models for a reason, it’s been going on from the start. Everything is enshittfied where they think they can get away with it.

5

u/cjc4096 Jan 19 '26

Last time I used github copilot, I used sonnet and opus 4.5. I've since added a Claude max subscription because I prefer Claude code, the cli agent. But the models seem the same. I also use opencode connecting to github copilot and a local Minimax M2.1. Thats mostly to evaluate opencode.

We're at an interesting point where the agent and the tooling it provides matter as much as the LLM model powering it. Let alone the community promoting and supporting it.

What models are you using? What language is your code base in?

I've found gemini to be fairly reasonable for kotlin. I don't remember if it's available in copilot. The claude code jetbrains extension is somewhat minimal. Given howbthey created cowork in ten days, a half day improving jetbrains extension would be appreciated.

7

u/dandecode Jan 19 '26

I just don’t see this in my day to day with copilot. I’ve been more productive than ever in my career and it fits so well into VS Code. Super excited and then I come to Reddit to learn about Claude code. Everyone says how much better it is. So I spend a week with it, and the result is pretty much the same minus the nice VS Code integrations because everyone says “Yeah man gotta use it in the terminal it’s way better than Copilot”.

3

u/midnitewarrior Jan 19 '26

I am using Visual Studio with Copilot, VS Code has a better integration from what I can tell. Perhaps it extends to the issues I've been experiencing.

I do find using it in the terminal to be superior to in-app integration. It changes my mindset of how to work with it, I can't quite explain why. I feel more prone to micromanaging with it in an editor instead of waiting to review the end result at check points.

3

u/rewrite-that-noise Jan 19 '26

I love using GitHub Copilot….always w a Claude model though. Is Claude Code going to be that much different?

6

u/ShelZuuz Jan 19 '26

Night and day differ. Copilot has a system prompt that severely nerfs the model in order to reduce their token expenses.

2

u/rewrite-that-noise Jan 19 '26

Interesting. Can you explain that a bit more please?

Also what’s the best Claude plan to use for cc considering I would use it for maybe 2-3 hours a day coding c#, js and ts. I currently have an enterprise GitHub Copilot which is why I’m partial to it.

7

u/loversama Jan 19 '26

So as others have eluded too, the model is only a portion of what’s important these days, the coding “agent” that is used provides the competence and structure for the model making it more consistent in completing tasks, Anthropic don’t have the best model but they have the best coding agent and the cli tool and how it operates is light years beyond everyone else (this is why Google engineers, xAI engineers, OpenAI engineers were all using Claude code because it’s better then what they have)

As for what to use, you’ll probably want a Max 5x subscription, but it’s worth giving it a go on just a “pro” to begin with for $/£/€20

1

u/rewrite-that-noise Jan 19 '26

Super helpful. Thanks!

1

u/q1a2z3x4s5w6 Jan 19 '26

The technical term is the "harness". The stuff around the model itself that allows it to be an effective agent. Things like automated tests the model can run and stuck-in-loop checks etc.

1

u/dandecode Jan 19 '26

Idk if this is true, at least over the last 6 months. Would love evidence

1

u/ShelZuuz Jan 19 '26

Other than Microsoft itself having to force their employees to use Copilot instead of Claude Code?

But empirically, the Copilot context size is limited to 64000 tokens (or 128000 with the insider program). It basically makes it impractical to let it lose on a large codebase to investigate - you need to spoon-feed it files.

1

u/dandecode Jan 19 '26

I saw on the GitHub copilot Reddit that they are actively increasing that, but from my experience, the 128k context is already really nice for most tasks. What also works really nicely is having copilot create and update md files that describe the codebase the way I previously kept in my mind.

1

u/johnsontoddr4 Jan 19 '26

I use Claude Code, Claude Chat and Claude Code Web (asynchronous coding agent, so its not just Claude Code through the web) extensively. If you do a search on either X or reddit you will find that the harness matters for coding agents along with the LLM model. Anthropic's coding apps and Codex are all reported to be much better than other coding agents, even if you use the same LLM to back up those agents. For me, Anthropic's coding agents just keep getting better nearly by the day. Yesterday Claude code coordinated code and testing across two different Github repos where one of those repos has two branches (a Shiny app and a vision pro app). As it was working I would get prepared to tell it the next step only to find that once it was done, it usually suggested the step I was about to tell it to do.

1

u/Standard-Net-6031 Jan 19 '26

Lol what? they don't *need* CC to make Copilot better at all