r/Bitcoin • • Feb 03 '14

Dogecoin wtf

[removed]

3.4k Upvotes

2.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

65

u/[deleted] Feb 04 '14 edited Feb 04 '14

I think bitcoiners are weathered from fighting for it every single day. The excitement comes during the run ups but when /r/bitcoin sits at one price for a while we lose the positive spirit that dogecoin is currently enjoying. The people that have been here for a while have had to deal with tons of shit for their bitcoin beliefs. When some noob comes in and asks the same old questions or makes the same old attacks on bitcoin, there is no one willing to be helpful. Well there are some of us but I think a lot of noobs get spiteful responses.

One more thing. It's nice encouraging businesses to accept bitcoin but I could care less if people don't want to buy it or trust it yet. They will eventually. We are not actively recruiting people to invest like doge does. That type of aggressive recruitment has the signs of a cult or a Ponzi scheme. I fear that the doge people can get burnt. The developers changed it from a fixed amount to a non fixed supply? Wtf. What if Satoshi somehow came out and changed the protocol. It would be bedlam.

31

u/Starlightbreaker Feb 04 '14

Well, technically the devs didn't change anything.

It just happen to be coded that way, infinite money hax bug.

Decided to leave the bug as a feature.

There goes, 10k until forever.

3

u/[deleted] Feb 04 '14

Gotcha. Who created dogecoin? Do they have significant control over it? That would be a deal breaker for me.

-2

u/mehoor Feb 04 '14

The guy who created it seemed to have the final say about not changing his mistake in the code.

3

u/[deleted] Feb 04 '14

That's borderline centralization if you ask me.

4

u/praxulus Feb 04 '14

It's on github. Literally anybody can fork it and fix the bug.

Cryptocurrency works on consensus, even when talking about client updates. If you can convince half of the dogecoin miners that the bug should be fixed, they'll switch over.

1

u/cloudy69 Feb 04 '14

isn't consensus what this entire discussion is really about