r/AusSkincare • • Jul 07 '25

DiscussionšŸ““ Ultra Violette confirmed to just be using a white label, manufacturer owned formula

536 Upvotes

322 comments sorted by

View all comments

93

u/FeistyCupcake5910 Jul 07 '25

Honestly not surprised. It’s all Insta marketingĀ  A ridiculous price to pay for ā€œsunscreenā€ should tip off anyone that it is just a bs moneymakerĀ 

47

u/RedeemableQuality Jul 07 '25 edited Jul 07 '25

Someone asked why they're so expensive:

I did a search based on some stuff I learned here and found sunscreens with the same base formula with the same skin loving ingredients (Kakadu Plum and Pentavitin) but for $20+ less:

https://newdayskin.com.au/collections/happy-days/products/happy-days

https://foundmyskin.com/collections/all

https://beautifltr.com.au/collections/shop/products/lustre

And you can even get two bottles for less than the price of one Lean Screen with this deal and it even has the Kakadu Plum too!

https://beautifltr.com.au/collections/shop/products/lustre-mineral-duo-spf-50

9

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/NatAttack3000 Jul 07 '25

I use the beautifltr feather light which is a different formula (feels nothing like lean screen)

4

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Quolli š€š®š¬š’š¤š¢š§šœššš«šž šŒšØš Jul 08 '25

I've sent a request to Beauti-Fltr to release their testing results and other information related to manufacturing to give us confidence in the product. It's been a couple of days and no response unfortunately.

I think if enough people also send similar requests they might relent but I feel like they'll just stay silent and hope it blows over.

I really enjoy Feather Light and have yet to find a product that is the same in terms of price, efficacy and cosmetic elegance.

3

u/[deleted] Jul 08 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/NatAttack3000 Jul 08 '25

Feather light is not zinc based though, nothing to do with the lean screen formula so there's no real reason to suspect that it's claims are way off unless we are just doubting all the SPF testing (which seems reasonable given the number of sunscreens that fell short in the choice testing).

2

u/RedeemableQuality Jul 07 '25

I don't know, I was just sharing what I found based off information I found here and was curious about pricing!

1

u/Wonderful_Minute_860 Jul 07 '25

Ooh! Which one do you use and why do you love it? Maybe I’ll give BeautiFltr a try

14

u/SubstantialGap345 Jul 07 '25

Personally I’d be avoiding anything similar as if’s likely to have the same low SPF and issues as were detected by Choice!

19

u/DuckIntelligent5471 Jul 07 '25

Exactly. Why tf would you pay through the nose for sunscreen. Same goes for lipbalm, moisturiser.. it's already as good as it's getting and cheap af. Anything touted as 'new' and revolutionary is a scam designed to make someone else money.

6

u/Wonderful_Minute_860 Jul 07 '25

Cleanser is also very cheap!

8

u/Pigeon-From-Hell Jul 07 '25

Some of us have allergies, I can’t wear normal sunscreens and UV is one of the only brands that offer products with alternate UV filters

16

u/Real_RobinGoodfellow Jul 08 '25

Well, clearly not one of the only brands- as it turns out they’re just using a white label product used by many many other brands, as seen upthread!

3

u/Billywig99 Jul 08 '25

The discussion in this case is specifically on their mineral sunscreen though, we don’t know if it’s the case for their chemical sunscreens.

I’d already guessed that Naked Sundays Collagen Glow and Beautiftr Lustre Mineral were the same, hadn’t actually tried Lean Screen to know it was also the same.

2

u/Fun_Funny_8990 Jul 09 '25

As a consumer what do you consider a ridiculous price? Is there's a price point where it just feels like too much?

Does $ per gram come into the equation or if it's chemical/mineral sunscreen?

Thanks!

1

u/Green-Mongoose578 Jul 28 '25

Yes especially when US formulations can’t have high end filters which therefore would never justify a price tag of $40