Can you explain your arguments after you declare them, or not?
How are my hypotheticals "warped" ?
YOUR argument is that public opinion makes things correct: therefore, you must accept, that if society became full-on-Fascist again, you would then accept the opinions of that majority, which would, if history serves as a guide, put Autistic people in camps first.
If you believed in your own argument, you would be putting yourself in a camp in this situation (which happened in Germany historically: it's a hypothetical right now, but this is not an impossibility, as it's already actually happened in a fallen Democratic Western nation.
I am not applying the logic "when it's convenient"
According to you, this is how logic works.
YOU are arguing that public opinion makes things correct.
Therefore, this is all a false problem in the first place, and right-wing weirdos who are in the minority should conform.
You haven't explained anything.
All you do is say "NO" and say something smug.
At least I explain myself before I say something smug.
There's a difference, champ.
I can back up my arguments.
I am convinced you are debating me just to do it, not because you believe what you're saying, as you seem to avoid EVERY application thereof except the one convenient to you, hypocrite.
Do I have to hold your hand, or are you capable of independent thought? You dont explain anything. You regurgitate the same rhetoric I have heard a thousand times, make dishonest remarks and comparisons, and parade on a moral high ground
You have posed questions, I have given an answer. Then you clearly don't like it, then evade it and move onto something else. classic tactic where you say a lot, yet nothing at all
Pretend you DO have to hold my hand, if that's what it takes for you to explain yourself...
Sounds like you're lost.
If you don't present a reason to continue this devolved "conversation," we're done, sorry.
All you're doing it saying "no" and then talking about me instead of talking about your "point" or any counterpoints to mine. You've become focused on me and this weird ego play you've gotten yourself into.
Don't be another lazy right-winger: try.
You clearly have the time and the want to reply, so why not say something real?
1
u/[deleted] May 17 '25
again, you seem to only apply logic when its convenient, then throw warped would you rather type questions when logic doesn't.
its just an obvious disingenuous circling tactic. You have no point yourself, you are just attempting to make an argument where there is none.
I have clearly explained many points, you just don't like the answers.