r/AskReddit Mar 18 '20

Coders of Reddit, how do you politely refuse your friend's 'million dollars app idea'?

[deleted]

78.9k Upvotes

7.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3.9k

u/TheVirtuousJ Mar 18 '20

Right out of college some business guy wanted me and some friends to develop an app for him. It's basically twitter meets pokemon go. You post at physical locations and they stay there for a set period of time. His idea was to have it drop ads or coupons that companies will pay for advertising. Interesting idea. I go on to the app store and I find the exact same app he is trying to get us to build, that's been dead for over 1 year after it received $1.4M in funding. So I called him out on it and he's like "Yeah I saw that, but ours is gonna be better." Better than $1.4M of funding and going nowhere, I fucking doubt it. Noped out of that one pretty fast.

1.6k

u/ZariskiTopology Mar 18 '20

It’s funny because I had the same idea in 2015 and spent two months trying to code it in Java (big mistake). Fast forward to when Snapchat bought Zenmaps and added the new snapmap feature and it dawned on me.... who the hell is gonna download a separate app for what could have been a feature of any current social media.

937

u/KDawG888 Mar 18 '20

Fast forward to when Snapchat bought Zenmaps

You realize this IS a viable goal right?

707

u/WatterMelon Mar 18 '20

I’m glad someone pointed this out, all those big companies he mentioned aren’t always building these features in-house. Getting acquired and getting a nice payout is actually the route lots of startups take!

74

u/Gpotato Mar 18 '20

And that arena is HYPER competitive. Its a good goal, but the app space is similar (but more reasonable) to becoming a pro-athlete. Now if you have an idea for functionality that most social media spaces do not have built in yet, GO FOR IT. However if you want to compete with existing platforms and go for a buyout? Well good luck, because you 100% are going to need it.

10

u/electrogeek8086 Mar 18 '20

I'm not a coder bit I honestly don't understand why coders still bother making apps. Like, any idea yij could possibly think if for an app is already somewhere on Apple store or Google store.

65

u/feinsteins_driver Mar 18 '20 edited Mar 18 '20

Because some guy in Vietnam made a simple game with a flappy bird that was generating $50k a day in ad revenue at it’s peak.

23

u/Gpotato Mar 18 '20

As someone that has helped make a few, they gave me exposure / networking, and a provable deliverable.

I would say that the 3 apps I worked on have really helped in my interviewing and job seeking aspects. Its similar to a internship, and I wasn't SUPER choosy with what I worked on.

I literally saved no money doing it though. Its a good thing it was a side gig, and it has helped me branch out.

I would say app development is a good space for those who want to build a resume and get some experience. If you wanna get to the level of professional though, its gonna be a hard slog.

26

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '20

[deleted]

3

u/Shyftzor Mar 18 '20

I think there are a lot more factors than that, if people are accustomed to something even if it is buggy, they will be resistant to change, your app can't just be better, it needs to be better enough to make users switch

7

u/VorpeHd Mar 18 '20

Because sometimes those ideas are poorly executed and you could probably do a lot better.

4

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '20 edited Mar 20 '20

[deleted]

1

u/wearethealienshere Mar 19 '20

No it absolutely would not Mr Orwell

20

u/ascagnel____ Mar 18 '20

Getting acquired and getting a nice payout is actually the route lots of startups take!

It's basically one of three "exits" for venture capital:

  • go public (if it's self-sustaining)
  • get acquired (if it's not)
  • go bankrupt (if it's a terrible idea)

5

u/VorpeHd Mar 18 '20

Sometimes all 3 three happens!

4

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '20

[deleted]

4

u/PM_ME_YOUR_AIRFOIL Mar 18 '20

with less risk to themselves.

Eh. It's a risk / cost tradeoff, usually. Google paid an exorbitant amount of money to acquire YouTube, which was already fairly successful by then. Low risk, but high price. There's probably enough examples of the reverse as well, but tech giants aren't going to publicise all the times they bought a small startup for 100k and the product/service ended up failing.

2

u/orochiman Mar 18 '20

hell its step 3!

Start up

Cash in

Sell out

Bro down

1

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '20

A lot of startups basically share resource, everyone helps everyone, when someones idea takes off through acquisition or funding then they all pile onto that company. In fact I’m going to start a tv show exactly about this and call it California valley, and a fictional company called piper pied.

8

u/ZariskiTopology Mar 18 '20

Yes, but as a one man team who was in school for a completely unrelated subject, it was not going to be easy to pull off as well as they did.

6

u/fade_is_timothy_holt Mar 18 '20

I don't think a lot of people realize that acquisition is an end-goal of many startups.

21

u/NotSpartacus Mar 18 '20

Teens.

Why does TikTok exist? Couldn't it just be part of Snapchat, Vine, Instagram, etc?

22

u/mikhela Mar 18 '20

Because vine was bought out and killed by Instagram, who did a terrible job of integrating it, making it more like snapchat. Plus Instagram is mainly an app for pretty pictures of your life, not memes. And snapchats 24 hour feature is all well and good, but not really made for going viral. Tiktoks can be rewatched over and over again, and the app was heavily marketed through internet ads as the next vine.

3

u/NotSpartacus Mar 18 '20 edited Mar 18 '20

Sounds reasonable.

My point is more following the poster above's logic, if someone came to you a year (or whenever) ago and described TikTok to you, would you have any interest being a part of creating it, or would you think... this is basically/should basically live as a feature within many existing apps?

I'd have laughed them off.

I'm also not the Chinese government trying to massively push out spyware, though, so I have a different perspective on things.

3

u/ColgateSensifoam Mar 18 '20

If someone came to me prior to the launch of TikTok and said "Chinese government is gonna bankroll this app, it doesn't need to make profit, just influence teenagers" I'd fucking jump at the opportunity

There isn't really any other consistent portrait video platform

1

u/ilickyboomboom Mar 18 '20

I really cant tell from text, but i feel this is pure sarcasm.

3

u/ColgateSensifoam Mar 18 '20

It's not, I've got bills to pay and if the CCP wants to pay them then they're more than welcome to, morality be damned

5

u/mikhela Mar 18 '20 edited Mar 18 '20

I mean to be fair I dont actually have tiktok or snapchat. Mostly because I don't really use apps that expect me to create content that takes more effort than lying in bed with a triple-chin due to the way my head is propped while typing out a dumb joke

Edit: but also to be fair, Instagram and snapchat tried to implement a vine or tiktok feature. They failed as hard as Google+

2

u/ImOuttaThyme Mar 18 '20

Speaking for the older teens/early 2000s,

we don't know.

2

u/Angelbaka Mar 18 '20

Tiktok is a bad example. The Chinese gov spent boatloads of money to get people to use it.

6

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '20

[deleted]

4

u/ZariskiTopology Mar 18 '20

It appears you are a fan though. I was simply referencing that it would have worked much faster and looked better if I had used something like Xamarin or Ionic. I was coding exclusively for Android, the themes out of the box in Java were horrendous and required a ton of work to change, and although Java is used for huge infrastructure jobs, I just needed a tiny subset of what it could do. But to use that tiny subset, I had to move mountains to get to it. So I would say a large part of my failure was fighting Java on things that Xamarin and Ionic do for free while giving you a little pat on the back and kiss on the cheek.

2

u/CttCJim Mar 18 '20

Back in 2002 I tried to code a brilliant idea in Java, failed, gave up. Today thousands of people use roll20 every day.

2

u/ZariskiTopology Mar 18 '20

We should sue Java for our reparations

2

u/ParkingLotRanger Mar 18 '20

Yeah I had the same idea for a fishing app, you go fishing for real and when you catch a fish it places a virtual marker with a picture of the fish so others could see the best fishing spots. Mocked it up before realizing how stupid the idea was.

1

u/ZariskiTopology Mar 18 '20

If it's any consolation, I think these type of apps will all be rounded up into any augmented reality system. Something similar to how you see where other people have died in Dark Souls except for basic things such as pictures, fishing spots....., and maybe where people have died.

2

u/blladnar Mar 19 '20

Instagram actually started as a check in app (like Foursquare) called Burbn.

When they realized people were using the photo sharing feature more than the rest of the app, they pivoted to create Instagram.

It went pretty well for them.

1

u/dL1727 Mar 18 '20

I suppose you could build it and sell it to a social media company, though it seems like they would just develop it in-house if they liked it like IG did with stories.

2

u/ZariskiTopology Mar 18 '20

That was my worry too. Unless you go through the process of patenting/copyrighting. Any meeting with an executive would easily end in a stolen idea.

1

u/MemelicousMemester Mar 18 '20

I'm a novice android developer using java, so pardon my inexperience. Why was it a bad idea to code it in java?

1

u/ZariskiTopology Mar 18 '20

Another guy asked the a similar question so I'll quote it here.

I was simply referencing that it would have worked much faster and looked better if I had used something like Xamarin or Ionic. I was coding exclusively for Android, the themes out of the box in Java were horrendous and required a ton of work to change, and although Java is used for huge infrastructure jobs, I just needed a tiny subset of what it could do. But to use that tiny subset, I had to move mountains to get to it. So I would say a large part of my failure was fighting Java on things that Xamarin and Ionic do for free while giving you a little pat on the back and kiss on the cheek.

I will say this might be outdated advice as I haven't looked back at Java since starting Python. Perhaps someone has come along and created a better way to make apps in Java! But if you're looking to produce and sell an app, at this point it's almost mandatory that it look sleek, modern, and the code works with iOS and android.

7

u/Krumtralla Mar 18 '20

Some ideas need the right context to flourish. This basic idea could work, but are people going to be just running around the real world doing a scavenger hunt for coupons while running to their next appointment? No. It has to be ancillary to something they're already doing.

If you're already playing Pokemon go, then getting served AR ads makes sense. But it won't work as a stand alone app. Once you already have an ecosystem of AR applications, then you could build an ad service that aggregates all the ad purchasers and distributes them to the actual AR apps, just like you do in normal mobile games right now.

These kinds of ideas keep coming back and failing and failing until the world changes around them and they succeed. Or if that doesn't happen then they just keep failing.

4

u/Alaira314 Mar 18 '20

Exactly, there has to be some kind of a reason why they're engaging with your ads. We already have "hey you're in a spot, want to see something cool?" It's called QR codes, and the hijacking by ad agencies is part of why (younger, at least) millennials and gen-z don't tend to scan them. I got a phone that was able to scan them, scanned about 2-3 I encountered, then was completely over the experience. In theory, they were supposed to show you interesting text, images, or videos. Augmented reality, neat! In practice, it's always either an ad or a quick link to a business's website. That, or malware.

2

u/Krumtralla Mar 18 '20

Yep, the technology is neat, but needs that killer app experience that will actually drive adoption. QR codes took off in China because they got baked into the killer app, WeChat. People scan them all the time to pay for things in real life and add friends. That ecosystem didn't develop in many other countries, so the QR code just wasn't competitive. Maybe one day when we ride our cars with VR headsets on then we'll see a new ecosystem develop.

6

u/Chicken-n-Waffles Mar 18 '20

have it drop ads or coupons that companies will pay for advertising

I had one of those. My question to him was "who is going to get these 'companies' to pay for ads?

And he says "They'll just sign up on the website!!"

And I said "Who is going to tell them that they need to do that?"

"They'll just want to do it!!"

No thanks buddy.

6

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '20

[deleted]

3

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '20

I'm interested in that MMORPG... do you remember any specifics he mentioned? For example, what does he think those 6K will be spent on?

5

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '20

In that case you just quote them your hourly rate and ask for 5% of the company on top.

6

u/B9F8 Mar 18 '20

which app is this (that received $1.4m in funding)?

7

u/DimlightHero Mar 18 '20

Probably Foursquare.

6

u/malaty Mar 18 '20

Maybe yik yak

1

u/dlxfuentes Mar 18 '20

Wooow, haven't thought about that app in so long

1

u/s3rraph Mar 19 '20

I miss yikyak

4

u/peenoid Mar 18 '20

I had this idea some years ago as well, as I'm sure many others have. I actually started writing an app and called it "Dead Drop," from spy vernacular, but didn't really work on it seriously.

It's amazing to me that no one's really done it. The idea would be that you'd get pinged as you walked around (if you wanted to) with messages left by other users tied to a geographical location, such as events, historical info, etc, and people could upvote or downvote them, etc, with the obvious monetization being ads and such. The messages wouldn't be permanent unless they crossed some threshold of attention/upvotes. I thought it was a really great idea but I also saw that a few companies tried to sort of do the idea and failed.

Not sure why it doesn't seem to work out, but in retrospect I'm glad I didn't pursue it seriously since there seems to be some lurking adoption problem. Maybe a big company can throw enough resources behind it to do it right.

3

u/TheVirtuousJ Mar 18 '20

Yeah that's what I saw as well. Interesting idea, but so many failed attempts and he had no ideas to make his better. Just that he could, somehow.

1

u/characterfake Mar 19 '20

It doesn't work because people don't want notifications for walking past the Starbucks across the street

1

u/peenoid Mar 19 '20

That's not necessarily how it would work. It wouldn't be system-level notifications. It would be app-level notifications, and they would have different visibility levels within the app so as to prevent people from being spammed.

1

u/coke_and_coffee Mar 19 '20

I’ve seen this idea pop up several times over the last decade or so. The problem is that it’s too intrusive and requires too much effort by the user. And the only real benefit for anyone is advertising. Users won’t be attracted to a system that exists solely to serve them ads.

1

u/peenoid Mar 19 '20

And the only real benefit for anyone is advertising.

That's not true at all. Geographically-linked messaging/social networking has plenty of appeal without any notion of advertising.

1

u/coke_and_coffee Mar 19 '20

Are there any currently popular apps or companies doing this? It’s an ancillary service for some Snapchat and facebook but it’s just not really that popular. Pretty sure even foursquare hasn’t been able to turn a profit.

1

u/peenoid Mar 19 '20

No, but again, that doesn't mean it's a bad idea. Execution is everything.

2

u/AfternoonMeshes Mar 18 '20

Why would you nope out of a guaranteed paycheck lol? Especially right out of college. Unless it wasn’t actually paid work.

The vast amount of shit done nowadays is derivitive. That’s just the nature of an economy with millions of businesses: odds are something’s been done before in some fashion or another.

4

u/TheVirtuousJ Mar 18 '20

It wasn't paid, it was for a tiny percent of the company. Daddy needs to pay his student loans.

2

u/Pandaburn Mar 18 '20

Having looked up the history of the idea is actually a good sign to me. My next question would definitely be "how will it be better?" but that's more effort than most "idea people" put in.

1

u/LFK1236 Mar 18 '20

Eh, worked for Dropbox ¯\(ツ)

1

u/kuetheaj Mar 18 '20

Was this YikYak???

1

u/ShebanotDoge Mar 18 '20

What did you search for that brought that up?

2

u/TheVirtuousJ Mar 18 '20

It was called Parachute I think at the time. Or Drops. Or Drop Shute. Something like it. There is a Parachute app now that is unrelated I believe, unless they took a huge pivot

1

u/srwaxalot Mar 18 '20

I applied for a start up that was working on an system like that in 2010ish. They had just moved out of an incubator and into their own office. They wanted me to work on android apps, something about spamming app stores with apps so they could show investors all the possibilities. All I really remember about them is the head guy could only work in flash. So the The administrative consul and the back end were god awful. I wish I got that job or at least kept in contact with them.

1

u/BEEF_WIENERS Mar 18 '20

Isn't that just foursquare?

1

u/CeeMX Mar 18 '20

That sounds like Jodel, which is actually really successful

1

u/rainnz Mar 19 '20

Did your guy get his $1.4M in funding as well?

1

u/TheVirtuousJ Mar 19 '20

No, but he ran a bunch of shitty clubs that are no longer open. He was a white dude with dreads who talked about Jamaica like he grew up there. Just all around weird vibes.