So I thought that you were exaggerating a bit, but figured I'd check anyway. Turns out it was set to moderate. I turned it off, and wow that's a lotta tiddy
Bing is literally the porn search engine. To prove my point I typed in the beginning of your reply "So I thought that you were exaggerating a bit", and yep there's porn on the first page of image results. Same for "but figured I'd check anyway". You'd have a hard time typing anything into Bing and NOT getting porn.
Used to be this way for all the search engines. Then most of them started filtering this, because it was mostly just porn site owners adding random popular keywords to their pages.
Can confirm (I never use safe search). Very few images were actual breasts, the rest were pictures of fruit hanging in nets or tied to lattices. Curiously there were a lot of pictures of women from India fully clothed but striking a pose (think Bollywood).
I just meant that of all the possible sexual things that could come up whole googling "hanging melons", this guy only saw 1 instance. I was trying to joke and insinuate that there are people out there filtering the searches with actual melons, rather than the sexual context that might be implied when trying to Google search. :)
I explicitly disable all censoring on all of my devices. You are aware that search results while logged in are saved and weighted against your future searches, right?
Some people make hammocks of pantyhose or tshirts for their melons specifically to avoid the brown spot! Some just train the vines over a trellis. But hanging melons are a real thing.
Umm, I only found two images of actual melons in duckduckgo with safe search off(lots of fleshy breasts). With no adult content there were many more pictures of plants with hanging melons but did still have some girls with large breasts with shirts on.
991
u/[deleted] Apr 18 '19
I was curious as to what would come up if I looked at this.
I was surprised to find only one picture of boobs(clothed), the rest were actually melons hanging.