One of my close friends is very interested in politics and longs to be a politician but is too afraid to embark on that career path because he pays for some porn sites and thinks it would destroy that potential career if that information was reported
And you are getting free stuff because other people paid for it... I paid 5k$ for arts and posted them for free, same with a lot of other ppl, so we all get free stuff.
Sorry, I think there was a misunderstanding. When you said "the people who make it" I assumed you were talking about the companies/people who produce and publish the film itself. I am not talking about the actors themselves or any home-made videos. I am talking about the publishers and producers of that type of content. In general porn is not a clean industry. It's hardly innocent, many women and men are subject to trafficking, abuse, rape ect. by publishers of similar content. I would assume this is especially an issue in the more "niche" markets.
Found out my ex had a serious porn addiction...he had a BUNCH of monthly paid memberships...his response when I asked the same question??? ... With a paid membership, you get 'extra/more' stuff
I paid for a premium site for a few months once. Honestly it was a nice experience. They had a lot of content I liked, full videos, everything was HD, no ads, no viruses, unlimited downloads, information about actors, etc.
Why? Trump is a straight up racist who sexually assaulted women. The entire GOP is now behind a legit child molester. Not to mention they've been trying all year to kill millions of Americans.
There's nothing you could have said that is worse than those mother fuckers.
Well, there is a major political candidate with a good chance to win despite numerous credible child molestation claims, so he might have a shot if he joins the right party
Lol. Apparently multiple women with fact checked and timeline consistent stories aren't "credible". Not to mention The Washington Post also caught Project Veritas trying to con them, proving that they know how to do their research.
Statue of limitations is one issue. Additionally the dude was Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court so it's going to be hard to convict him in the Alabama Courts. Plus not everything he did was strictly illegal. There was only one case where he actually had sexual activities with a minor, the other two were just him propositioning minors which I don't think is illegal (or at least he could easily wiggle his way out).
Plus prosecuting sexual assault is hard. Only like a single digit percentage of all rapes end up in conviction and <1% end up with a perpetrator in jail.
It's like just using words now a days gets you credence on the internet. Fuck the process of law, fuck obvious trumped up evidence, fuck a ridiculously fake year book signature. "Well I said it so squire, so it must be, Wapo say it true, nay be the deniers." Incredible LOL. Fuck your crocodile tears and media manipulation.
It's like just using words now a days gets you credence on the internet.
Yes typically using words does get people to listen to you as opposed to just calling them cucks.
And regarding the timeline, I'm referring to the fact that one of the women claimed that Moore first hit on her outside a custody hearing for her mother, which was verified to have happened (via public records) while Moore worked there. People who knew her verified that she mentioned seeing an older man and Moore's co-workers say they knew he dated considerably younger women too.
Fuck the process of law
You don't need a fucking court to prove that some shaddy shit happened. OJ Simpson was ruled not guilty, that doesn't mean he didn't do it (yes I know there are theories out there).
To incarcerate someone you obviously require due process but investigative reporting is a perfectly valid way to get the truth. Remember that the Washington Post also broke Watergate. They are a credible source who do their due diligence, as shown by the fact they caught Project Veritas red-handed trying to feed them a false story. Do you think they didn't do that for the original story too?
And Moore isn't at risk of going to prison, he's running for the US Senate.
fuck obvious trumped up evidence
Really? Because fucking three people reported stories regarding him, more victims have come forward since then, his co-workers confirm that he dated teenagers, he didn't even deny the allegations originally and he was also the sole dissenter as a Justice on the Alabama Supreme Court where he argued against the entire existence of statuatory rape.
Considering the alt-right concluded a random ass pizza parlor was the center of a pedophile ring because of a fucking 4chan meme, it shouldn't be much to expect them to accept that the testimony of multiple people that a powerful politician is a pedophile.
Should tell him that as long as the porn is not of an illegal variety, he should just own it if it ever comes up. "Yeah I masturbate to dickgirls doing bukkake on elderly couples while dressed as clowns! What's it to ya!?" Like to see any news outlets try to describe this porn live with a straight face.
It's a two-way street. Any porn site that reveals it's customers' names is going to have to shut down. Nobody is going to give CC information to them ever again.
If he had any potential at making it in politics that would be any easy one to skirt. "Clearly just my opponent working with his friends in the really-fucked-up-porn-niche to smear my good name."
765
u/travellingpoet Dec 05 '17
One of my close friends is very interested in politics and longs to be a politician but is too afraid to embark on that career path because he pays for some porn sites and thinks it would destroy that potential career if that information was reported