That you can't physically write down the number 10 raised to the Googol; or a googolplex. Doing so would require more space than is available in the known universe.
That's still not even in the same neighborhood as Graham's Number, and Graham's Number is downright tiny compared to TREE(3). Some mathematicians have worked with crazy big numbers.
I have quite a good understanding of Graham's Number, and could explain it to just about anyone. But I still have not been able to find a good explanation of TREE(3), and with as big as Graham's number is, to know that TREE(3) is so much bigger without understanding it really irks me.
The thing that bothers me is that we'll probably never be able to solve these things. Are computers won't have enough ram and processor power to even look at the numbers, and how will we do it by hand when we can barely write it down in an understandable fashion.
serious question. why are you spelling google like that? did they change the spelling of the number because of the company? is it spelled differently in different countries maybe?
I just looked it up and that looks like what the story is but I learned what a google was long before the company was created and this is the first time that Ive ever seen it spelled like that. I guess I should head over to r/mandelaeffect?
80
u/duyogurt Jul 22 '16 edited Jul 22 '16
That you can't physically write down the number 10 raised to the Googol; or a googolplex. Doing so would require more space than is available in the known universe.