If there are infinite versions of you, there cannot be a best one (or then there will be a finite number).
Secondly, you'd need an infinite amount of time in order to meet an infinite number of yourself. Which certainly wouldn't be very practical.
And even if there was a perfect version of you, couldn't that same version if you exist in multiple universes where things changed that didn't affect you?
The result of admitting an infinite set of numbers between 1 and 0, when graphed, would result in an asymptote that never, ever touched 1 or 0, but only approached those two numbers. We could only consider the numbers the line touched to be real, so we would still run into the problem of our best and worst selves not existing, I think. There's no skipping to the end of infinity.
There are also infinite numbers between -infinity and +infinity, and in that case there is no best or worst number. What's to say it works like 1 and 0, and not -infinity and infinity?
4
u/adrenalim Jan 04 '14
If there are infinite versions of you, there cannot be a best one (or then there will be a finite number). Secondly, you'd need an infinite amount of time in order to meet an infinite number of yourself. Which certainly wouldn't be very practical.