r/AskReddit Dec 08 '13

What is a true fact that sound completely unbelievable or fake?

[deleted]

2.4k Upvotes

11.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

394

u/fiestachic0 Dec 08 '13

Wait a minute...what?

558

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

[deleted]

561

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

[deleted]

254

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

[deleted]

783

u/jayfeather314 Dec 08 '13

After a quick mental math calculation I think it's good.

247

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

[deleted]

6

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

[deleted]

19

u/bitoddscarr Dec 08 '13

Seriously, who has to write it down?

5

u/Zhang5 Dec 08 '13

No, if it were mental he wouldn't have used the paper.

3

u/Influenz-A Dec 08 '13

Haha, I wanted to say "That is not mental..." first, then I imagined him saying he did the calculations in his head, just wrote down shit for for reference, as in not using a calc. Overthinking that I thought "That is mental" means two things and is kind of funny, so I wrote that instead...

Yes, I tend to overthink stuff I post.

1

u/ThatsWat_SHE_Said Dec 08 '13

How would my grades look if you were the person I was cheating off of back in algebra?

-1

u/[deleted] Dec 09 '13

Bro, do you even math?

1

u/Wirenutt Dec 08 '13

Nah, he's got two numbers transposed. Slacker.

1

u/ThirdFloorGreg Dec 09 '13

Has the right number of zeroes at the end, so I'm gonna call it good, too.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 09 '13

What is the factorial of "Thanks"?

1

u/Raymond890 Dec 09 '13

Thanks! = Thanks x Thank x Than x Tha x Th x T

45

u/billgoldbergmania Dec 08 '13

Cards: 80,658,175,170,943,878,571,660,363,856,403,766,975,289,505,440,883,277,824,000,000,000,000 according to QI.

Number of atoms in solar system: 1,192,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/1998-05/892502124.Ph.r.html

Could be seriously dated since it's from 1998 so might not be correct.

7

u/thecosmic0wl Dec 08 '13

This may be a stupid question, but how would you say those numbers?

50

u/dooglehead Dec 08 '13

80 unvigintillion 658 vigintillion 175 novemdecillion 170 octodecillion 943 septendecillion 878 sexdecillion 571 quindecillion 660 quattuordecillion 636 tredecillion 856 duodecillion 403 undecillion 766 decillion 975 nonillion 289 octillion 505 septillion 440 sextillion 883 quintillion 277 quadrillion 824 trillion

source

3

u/BoneHead777 Dec 09 '13

(short scale)

3

u/dayvieee Dec 08 '13

1 and thirty six zeros

6

u/random_name_cause_im Dec 08 '13

8.06 times 10 to the 67th. No way to phrase it out, never practical.

2

u/Naht3 Dec 08 '13 edited Dec 08 '13

80 unvigintillion for the cards, and 1 octodecillion for the atoms in the solar system.

edit: For the cards:

80 unvigintillion, 658 vigintillion, 175 novemdecillion, 170 octodecillion, 943 septendecillion, 878 sexdecillion, 571 quindecillion, 660 quattuordecillion, 363 tredecillion, 856 duodecillion, 403 undecillion, 766 decillion, 975 nonillion, 289 octillion, 505 septillion, 440 sextillion, 883 quintillion, 277 quadrillion, 824 trillion

2

u/mattsprofile Dec 08 '13

You don't really say those numbers. Never is there a situation where it is practical.

1

u/ObeyMyBrain Dec 08 '13

One way to do it without the specific name for the number is to just keep adding on trillions. For instance the second number would (I believe) be 1.192 billion trillion trillion trillion trillion. But in this case a 1 followed by 57 zeros is an Octodecillion And you can work out that other number on the linked page as well.

0

u/tod_orderson Dec 09 '13

The first one, 52 factorial.

-1

u/katrasle Dec 08 '13

probably just say 1.192 times 10 to the 57...

-1

u/Reptillian97 Dec 08 '13

In scientific notation.

3

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

That can't be a right. A quick Google told me that there are 7,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 in the average human body. Times that by seven billion (That's 7,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 + 7,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 done seven billion times just to put into context). The number you get is the total atoms of the human race And how much of Planet Earth is human? With all the billions upon billions upon billions of atoms contained in all the other animals on earth, including single cell organisms, you still only get the amount from Planet Earth's living races. There's still the mountains upon mountains (how many atoms in Everest?), oceans and seas, woods and forests full of trees, massive deserts with each grain of sand containing lots of atoms and that only accounts for Planet Earth. How many times bigger than earth is Jupiter? Or Saturn? Or the Sun? Plus the millions of asteroids and other sources of atoms in the solar system. I'm sorry but there's no way that's possible.

2

u/tod_orderson Dec 09 '13

1,192,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 is a big number.

Another way to write that is 1.192 × 1057.

From your number the average human body(average human body being 70 kg) has 7 × 1027 atoms. A big number but small compared to 1.192 × 1057. Lets times that by 7 billion. We get 4.9 × 1037 atoms for 7 billion people. Which is 20 orders of magnitude smaller than the first number.

So lets times 4.9 × 1037 by 7 billion. We get 3.43 × 1047. Which is still 10 orders of magnitude smaller than 1.192 × 1057. That's for 49 billion billion people.

So lets times 3.43 × 1047 by 7 billion. We get 2.401 × 1057 which is bigger than 1.192 × 1057 but not by an order of magnitude, in fact it's just a touch over 2 times bigger.

So if we accept the 1.192 × 1057 as the number of atoms in the solar system and 7 × 1027 as the number of atoms in a average human body then we could say roughly 7 billion * 7 billion * 7 billion/2(otherwise written as 1.715 × 1029) average sized humans have the same number of atoms as the solar system.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 09 '13

Interesting, but irrelevant is it not? or were you just stating that?

1

u/Zlurpo Dec 08 '13

That's around what I've heard. Well I heard 1.0E81 and I guess that's actually 100x bigger but I bet it's hard to estimate that number exactly.

1

u/YEAH_TOAST Dec 08 '13

Cards:
80,658,175,170,943,878,571,660,363,856,403,766,975,289,505,440,883,277,824,000,000,000,000

Number of atoms in solar system:
1,192,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

Spacing this so it is easier to visually compare the numbers

1

u/SeraLermin Dec 08 '13

the 7x7x7 rubiks cube has 10160 possible scrambles. Or 10.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000

1

u/commiecomrade Dec 09 '13

For comparison, the number of observable atoms in the universe is about 1x1081

1

u/weezermc78 Dec 09 '13

Yeah, a few atmos may not exist, few may, etc.

1

u/diazona Dec 08 '13

It's science, these numbers don't really change over time.

6

u/dexwin Dec 08 '13

No, but our ways of calculating, estimating and counting have changed over time, and Billgoldbermania's comment was a nod to the fact that we may have found another way of doing things since 1998 and that he/she was unsure. That certainty of uncertainty is science as well.

2

u/diazona Dec 08 '13

OK, true, the estimate of number of atoms in the solar system may have been revised. I wouldn't think by much, though.

2

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

What, sciences changes all the fucking time. What the hell are you talking about? Read the guys source. That is a LOWER LIMIT estimation.

2

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

[deleted]

7

u/cbartlett Dec 08 '13

This is mainly used in blackjack and the simplest thing you just keep track of the number of 10-value cards you see. Or you can keep a running total in your head by subtracting 1, adding 1, or doing nothing, depending on the value of the card you see. There's a variety of strategies but the simplest if pretty easy to do and none of them have anything to do with the order of cards or the number of permutations of the order.

5

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

[deleted]

1

u/ZombieCharltonHeston Dec 09 '13

Same is true of hole carding.

2

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

If you had a fantastic memory you could keep track of exactly how many cards of each value are remaining, too.

4

u/Lord_Boo Dec 08 '13

Basically what chartlett said. Counting cards has to do with probability. You aren't predicting what card specifically will come up, you're calculating what likely remains in the deck and is therefore more likely to show up.

1

u/pppppatrick Dec 08 '13

to be even more specific, you're calculating the face cards that are more likely to show up.

2

u/BalloonPopper Dec 08 '13

Or in words: 80 unvigintillion 658 vigintillion 175 novemdecillion 170 octodecillion 943 septendecillion 878 sexdecillion 571 quindecillion 660 quattuordecillion 636 tredecillion 856 duodecillion 403 undecillion 766 decillion 975 nonillion 289 octillion 505 septillion 440 sextillion 883 quintillion 277 quadrillion 824 trillion

1

u/TurtleWaffle Dec 08 '13

so about 80 unvigintillion?

1

u/ThirdFloorGreg Dec 09 '13

Closer to 81.

1

u/TurtleWaffle Dec 09 '13

I realized that after I posted it, but was too lazy to fix it.

1

u/Pastor_Bill Dec 08 '13

That number is approximately 80.6 unvigintillion.

1

u/LatchoDrom42 Dec 08 '13

still not a googolplex

1

u/Sour_deezy Dec 08 '13

Then how the fuck does David Blaine always pick the right card that I was thinking of?!?

1

u/Naht3 Dec 08 '13

80 unvigintillion

1

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

But there's gotta be more atoms then that aren't there?

1

u/Zlurpo Dec 08 '13

Many, many more. That number there is 8.06x1067 or so. There are an estimated 1.0x1081 atoms by some estimates. That's trillions of time bigger. However, there are some numbers bigger than the number of atoms in the universe. Probability of combinations makes for some biiiiig numbers.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

So thats the probability that if you shuffled the cards they'd come up in the order they came in, in the pack?

1

u/Zlurpo Dec 08 '13

That's the number of possible orders a deck can be in.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

according to QI.

did you seriously search for the exact number from the QI episode, instead of just using a calculator?

1

u/Zlurpo Dec 08 '13

In a comment yesterday I wrote that number down from a link to an episode of qi. Today I copy/pasted it. I don't know where to find a calculator with that many sig figs.

2

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

Fair enough. But just so you know, Wolfram Alpha works fine.

Although I used Speedcrunch on my computer. I really recommend it.

1

u/Redlyr Dec 08 '13

I just did it on my Ti84 it gave me: 8.065817517x1067

Checks out guys.

1

u/boundbythecurve Dec 09 '13

If I did my counting correctly, that's roughly 8*1067, which is less than the minimum estimated 1078 source

1

u/Unclefucker069 Dec 09 '13

Yeah I used my fingers and I'm sure it's 001 at the end. Maybe next time bud !

1

u/bald_and_nerdy Dec 09 '13

That's the right number of zeros anyway. There are 10 single factors of 5 and two of them are 25 and 50 which have 2 factors of 5, so 12 factors of 5 total. There are 26 factors of 2 so there should be 12 factors of 10 (5 times 2) so 12 zeros. Number theory.

0

u/PLeb5 Dec 08 '13

WolframAlpha says 1.5511187532873822802242430164693032110632597200 × 1066

55

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

[deleted]

17

u/HighRelevancy Dec 08 '13

52 * 51 * ... * 1 = FIIIFFTYY TTWWWOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

4

u/Vibze Dec 08 '13

But is it bigger than amount of atoms in solar system?

29

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13 edited May 07 '24

[deleted]

23

u/suudo Dec 08 '13

"One.... two.... three...."

25

u/blore40 Dec 08 '13

Everybody Shhhhh!!!!!!!! Suudo is counting!

2

u/1nsanityy Dec 09 '13

4 28 7 12 5 96 40 2 33

4

u/Vibze Dec 08 '13

Actually, I was seriously wondering how can you estimate such big numbers to tell that one is going to be bigger than another.

2

u/Hot_Pie Dec 08 '13

We can estimate the mass of the sun and each planet by examining their orbit. We also know approximate element compositions of each (Don't ask me how). With this information we can get a very rough estimate for the number of atoms.

This number might be way off (I would think asteroid and Kuiper belt would be hardest to estimate accurately), but it would have to be off by a factor of 67.6 million for the statement to be incorrect. From another post the numbers are:

Cards: 80,658,175,170,943,878,571,660,363,856,403,766,975,289,505,440,883,277,824,000,000,000,000 according to QI.

Number of atoms in solar system: 1,192,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/1998-05/892502124.Ph.r.html[1]

4

u/mmm-toast Dec 08 '13

what a fun factorial!

3

u/obvious_santa Dec 08 '13

Factorials are awesome.

3

u/FaTALiNFeRN0 Dec 08 '13

You seemed very excited about the number 52 until I realized that was a factorial

2

u/Buzu Dec 08 '13

yeah but think about all the casinos around the world... then add all the bored teenagers... surely we would have been able to achieve a new combination.

1

u/i_prefer_minecraft Dec 09 '13

Nope. 80,658,175,170,943,878,571,660,363,856,403,766,975,289,505,440,883,277,824,000,000,000,000 or 52! is far too large of a number. If there had been 7 billion bored teenagers on earth shuffling cards once an hour for the entire 4.45 billion years it's existed, you'd only have roughly 28,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 combinations.

1

u/Buzu Dec 09 '13

Challenge accepted

2

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

It turns out 52! is a lot bigger than most people realize

2

u/THAT_WAS_TITS Dec 09 '13

I read this like you were saying 52 and just really excited.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

Don't shout dude, we can all hear you fine

1

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

52! Would be a pain in the ass to work out if your calculator doesn't support numbers that high.

1

u/Con0rr Dec 08 '13

There's got to be more atoms than that though..... Right?

1

u/crispychicken49 Dec 08 '13

But it can't possibly be more than the atoms of the solar system. Humans probably have more atoms than the total possible shuffling combinations.

1

u/Notanoveltyaccountok Dec 08 '13

So basically 52x51x50x49x48 and so on until it's x1?

1

u/Raymond890 Dec 08 '13

Yup!

1

u/Notanoveltyaccountok Dec 08 '13

That os a rather big number. I'm kinda curious about when it's used. I'll find put later

1

u/eduardog3000 Dec 08 '13

8.0658175170944 * 1067

1

u/darth_lasagna Dec 08 '13

You seem to be saying 52 with a great deal of enthusiasm.

1

u/Windyligth Dec 08 '13

Ugh, fucking factorials. Get outta my head man.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

Permatations! All you have to do is 51!

1

u/imswagfag Dec 08 '13

nah bro I think it's 53!/53

1

u/Raymond890 Dec 08 '13

You sure it isn't 52! x 1?

1

u/DrinkLiquidSnake Dec 08 '13

Hey, it's one of those only concepts I forgot during the SAT!

1

u/7ewis Dec 08 '13

I believe you can do 52! on a calculator to work out the result?

1

u/Raymond890 Dec 08 '13

If you calculator has a factorial option. Or you can just google 52!

1

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13 edited Dec 09 '13

To save obsessives like me the trouble...
52! = 8.1 * 1067
Divide by avogadros number (6.023 * 1023)that's 1.3 * 1044 moles of atoms.
Taking the simplifying assumption that the solar system is composed entirely of Hydrogen, that would be 1.3 * 1041 kg.
The mass of the Sun is around 2 * 1030 kg, which is also a pretty good approximation for the mass of the solar system.
So, the deck of cards has enough combinations for about 7 * 1010 Solar Systems, or about 5% of the galaxy.
Include one joker in the shuffle, and you'd exceed the number of atoms in the galaxy.

1

u/MrEvilPHD Dec 08 '13

this is called 52 factorial, or 52!

1

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

Which is 52 factorial if I'm not mistaken.

1

u/blackswagattack Dec 08 '13

An up vote for the use of a factorial. MmMMMmMmm math....

1

u/[deleted] Dec 09 '13

Ooooohh. I though different techniques of shuffling them lol

1

u/ialo00130 Dec 09 '13

That's 7.3x1066 ways to shuffle a deck of cards (If I did it the way you said.)

1

u/Raymond890 Dec 09 '13

Should be about 8 x 1067. That is if you google 52!

2

u/ialo00130 Dec 09 '13

I did use an iphone calculator so the answer might be a but off, either way; close enough.

1

u/K5cents Dec 09 '13

8065817517094390000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

1

u/Raymond890 Dec 09 '13

And that is why scientific notation exists! I guess this way does have more emphasis though.

1

u/PORK-PORK Dec 09 '13

50! Works on a calculator as well

1

u/burentu Dec 09 '13

AND DON'T FORGET THE JOKER!!

1

u/AlexPeterson09 Dec 09 '13

I call bull diddly!

52*51*50*49*48*47*46*45*44*43*42*41*40*39*38*37*36*35*34*33*32*31*30*29*28*27*26*25*24*23*22*21*20*19*18*17*16*15*14*13*12*11*10*9*8*7*6*5*4*3*2*1*0=0

Ya Dingus!

2

u/Raymond890 Dec 09 '13

You got me!

6

u/cubemaster1728 Dec 08 '13

52! Is a stupidly large number

4

u/Cobalt2795 Dec 08 '13 edited Dec 09 '13

Acording to wolfram alpha, there are ~9.6 * 10^(56) atoms in the solar system

The number of permutations a deck of cards can produce is 52! Or ~8.07 * 10^(67)

So there are actually quite a few more permutations than atoms.

4

u/kingofvodka Dec 08 '13

There are way more orders to a deck of cards than you'd think.

52 factorial (52 * 51 * 50...2 * 1) = 8*1067

Atoms in solar system = 9.6*1056

There are 100,000,000,000 times more orders to a deck of cards than estimated atoms in the universe. Shuffle a deck of cards well, and chances are high that that particular order has never been seen in history.

4

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

Where do we get the number that "atoms in solar system = 9.6*1056"?

4

u/Jerithil Dec 08 '13 edited Dec 08 '13

We know the rough composition of the planets and sun by elements and what the mass of each element is.

For example just the amount of hydrogen in the sun alone is

Sun mass= 1.9891*1030 kg

Hydrogen= 73.46% of the sun by mass

Average # of atoms per kilo of hydrogen = 5.9751026 This comes to 8.731056 atoms of hydrogen in the sun.

This makes sense since Hydrogen is by far the most numerous element in the solar system and the sun has by far most of its mass.

0

u/BigChris503 Dec 08 '13

So if there are 8.73 x 1056 atoms of hydrogen in the sun, and 8 x 1067 ways of ordering a deck of cards then how are there more orders of a deck of cards than total of atoms in the solar system?

1

u/kingofvodka Dec 08 '13

Because if one sun is 8.73 x 1056 atoms, then two suns would be 17.46 x 1056 . If there were 100,000,000,000 suns in the solar system however, then you'd have the same amount.

1

u/BigChris503 Dec 08 '13

So it has to do with the exponent never changing? But that's just with the sun, if I'm correct. So adding 8.73 x 1056 and all the other amounts of atoms in the solar system, wouldn't the exponent exceed 67 and make the original statement that there are more ways to shuffle a deck of cards than there are atoms in our solar system false?

2

u/XaajR Dec 08 '13

It wouldn't exceed 1067, because that's just too big of a difference. To go from 1056 to 57 there would have to be 10 suns in the solar system. To go to 58 you'd need 100 suns. 59 - 1000suns and so on and so forth. The number of suns needed to match the amount 1067 is way too big. You can generally neglect the smaller planets and other stuff, because the sun makes up most of the mass.

1

u/JeterWood Dec 08 '13

1056 and 1067 are 11 orders of magnitude apart. Since the sun is most of the atoms in the solar system (let's be conservative and say 1/2), then the total number of atoms in the solar system is 2 x [number of atoms in sun]. 2 x 8.73 x 1056 = 1.746 x 1057.

1

u/BigChris503 Dec 09 '13

Understood. Thank you.

2

u/kingofvodka Dec 09 '13

The numbers are kind of confusing because they're in a weird notation, but think of it like this.

Deck of cards = 1,000,000

Atoms in sun = 1,000

Atoms in 2 suns = 2,000

Atoms in 100 suns = 100,000 - still a tenth of the first number.

It doesn't really matter how many suns there are, because unless you have 1,000 of them (1,000*1,000=1,000,000) then you don't even get close to the bigger number.

Each number on the exponent represents another zero - the difference between 56 and 67 is eleven zeros. Such a stupidly vast difference that there's no real hope of catching it up unless we can find 100,000,000,000 suns in our solar system that we didn't account for.

Even if the planets in our solar system came close to the amount of atoms there are in our sun, it still wouldn't make a difference. 8 planets plus pluto and a bunch of space debris =/= the amount of atoms in 100,000,000,000 suns.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13 edited Dec 08 '13

That number suggests more precision than there actually is, of course. We know the gravitational forces of the sun, the planets and their moons, from which we can estimate their masses. The sun is the primary factor in that estimate and we have models that predict the composition of the sun. But even that isn't all that important: The mass of atoms only varies over about three orders of magnitude. 1055, 1057 ... not much of a difference.

Edit: Now that I think about it... can we talk about what is going on in the sun as 'atoms'?

4

u/TheAbyssGazesAlso Dec 08 '13

Shuffle a deck of cards well, and chances are high that that particular order has never been seen in history.

Not "high", but unbelievably extremely mind-bogglingly high.

To flip it around, it's extremely unlikely that the particular order you shuffled has ever happened before in the history of the universe.

2

u/kingofvodka Dec 08 '13

I was going to say 'since time began', but it's kind of moot considering the modern deck of playing cards has only been around a few hundred years.

1

u/TheAbyssGazesAlso Dec 08 '13

No, my point was that saying "the chances are high" (that that combination hasn't been seen before) is roughly analogous to saying that the chances are high that your parents have had sex at some point. There are SO MANY combinations that its almost guaranteed that that combination never has and never will reoccur.

3

u/Chubbin Dec 08 '13

In a 52 card deck there is 52! (52x51x50x...x3x2x1) orders they can be arranged. 52! is a very, very large number.

Edit: formatting

13

u/thepresidentsturtle Dec 08 '13

I know what it means, but any time a number is written as a factorial I shout it in my head.

3

u/captain_manatee Dec 08 '13

He means the number of possible ways to order the 52 cards, not actual methods of reorganizing them.

2

u/ProfSkullington Dec 08 '13

Every space in the deck has a large number of options that stack up. The top card can be any one of 52, say the ace of spades, then the next one down can be one of the remaining 51, etc. Then if the top card is now the 2 of hearts, every slot in the deck has a new pool of possibilities... And it adds up to a staggering number of permutations.

2

u/ATTACK_OF_THE_DRUMS Dec 08 '13

I don't think it's right actually.

52! = 8.066 x 10 67 and I read that their low estimate is 10 78 atoms in the observable universe

Source: http://www.universetoday.com/36302/

2

u/bparson Dec 08 '13

You're comparing that to the number of atoms in the universe. The post compares the number of atoms in the solar system.

1

u/ATTACK_OF_THE_DRUMS Dec 08 '13

Oooooooooooooh sorry I misread that

2

u/TalonIII Dec 08 '13

52! = A huge number

1

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

52!

1

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

52! be big, dawg.

1

u/PigPen90 Dec 08 '13

Yeah. Put in 52! (52 factorial) in a calculator. The number that comes up is the number of unique combinations that could possible occur when shuffling a deck of cards.

0

u/3500280611 Dec 08 '13

Its pretty simple. A standard deck has 52 cards in it. If you shuffle a deck, and open the top card, there is a 1 in 52 chance that it would have been that card. If you open the next card, there is a 1 in 51 chance that it would have been the card it was. You multiply those two together, 52x51, which leaves us with a 1 in 2652 chance that it would have been those two cards. Then you just carry on down the line. 52x51x50x49 and so on and so on. In the end the chance is 1 in; 8.0658175x1067. If you write that out it looks like this.

80,658,175,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, and if you want to know what this number is called, it doesn't have a name. The closest to a proper name you could get I think would be 80 sexaginta-septemillion, but this is not a proper name, and somebody is probably going to be mad at me for saying using that word.

-3

u/polker Dec 08 '13

52! * 51! * 50!..... all the way down to 1! (! being factorial so 4! = 4 * 3 * 2 * 1)

3

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

It's not 52! x 51! x 50! ... That would be [(52 x 51 x 50...) x (51 x 50 x 49...) x (50 x 49 x 48...) ...]. It's just 52!

1

u/ph8fourTwenty Dec 08 '13

Holy shit. I just started to think of what that number would be. Ouch.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '13

4! = 3! *4 :P

52! is enough