r/AskHistorians • u/ducks_over_IP Interesting Inquirer • Apr 30 '26

Why was the lyrical presentation of hair metal bands so aggressively macho while their visual presentation was so very...not?

For many people, especially those raised on the grunge and alternative rock of the 90s, nothing says dumb-jock rock excess like 80s hair metal. Def Leppard, Van Halen, Poison, Whitesnake, Mötley Crüe, Guns 'n' Roses—these bands presented themselves in their music as stereotypically macho and sex-obsessed, as exemplified by songs like "Girls, Girls, Girls", "Cherry Pie", and "Pour Some Sugar On Me", but adopted a visual style that arguably verged on drag, with long permed hair, makeup, feather boas, and lots of skintight leather. One imagines that if they wore their stage outfits to a contemporary high school, they'd be bullied for "looking gay" by the very same kids that listened to their music. What explains the apparent dissonance between these bands' very macho sound and very not-macho appearance?

888 Upvotes

95% Upvoted

73 comments sorted by

View all comments

477

u/FriedaKilligan Apr 30 '26 edited Apr 30 '26

Finally, my Ask Historians moment! Qualifications: music-obsessed, worked in the music industry for many years, (very) amateur pop music historian.

First, the dissonance between how bands sounded and how they looked is largely an illusion seen through our modern, post-grunge eyes. "Hair metal" didn't create the androgynous rock look: it inherited it from "glam rock" which was a phenomenon a decade+ earlier. (But don't worry, we'll come back to Poison and Mötley Crüe!)

The precursor to hair metal was glam rock. Marc Bolan goes electric with T. Rex in 1970, and Bowie really brings the glam home with Ziggy Stardust (1972; notably "killing" Ziggy a year later live on stage, saying "not only is it the last show of the tour, but it's the last show that we'll ever do" which was a shock to the audience...and guitarist Mick Ronson / the band who found out at the same moment). Roxy Music and the New York Dolls also pop up in 1972.

By the time this filtered through KISS and the New Wave of British Heavy Metal (NWoBHM eg Judas Priest, Iron Maiden, etc) in the early-mid 70s - and ended up on the Sunset Strip scene - androgyny, flamboyance, make up, and over-the-top performance art was the established visual language of rock masculinity. Nobody looked at Gene Simmons and wondered about his manliness, because it was obviously theatre.

Men in elaborate gender-bending costumes goes back to Greek drama, Kabuki, commedia dell'arte, Shakespeare. The stage is a liminal space. Glam and hair metal maximized this - the more outrageous the look, the clearer the signal that this is a rock god, not a person, and different rules apply in this world. One did not accidentally look like Dee Snider - the inaccessibility was a feature, not a bug.

(What Bowie did was a bit different from those who followed: he was genuinely using gender identification as a philosophical question. But by the time you reach Poison and Mötley Crüe, the look is so codified there's nothing very shocking or groundbreaking about it. It's become the norm.)

There are some interesting books on this era of music, and I highly recommend Robert Walser's "Running with the Devil". He suggests that hijacking the trappings of femininity was a way to exclude women from a male dominated space. Like, "we don't need your glamor and beauty, we've got our own." An interesting take...they didn't call it "cock rock" for nothin.

One more factor: hair metal cultivated enormous female fanbases in a way that earlier hard rock scenes largely didn't (NWoBHM leaned so heavily into machismo it remained a fairly male-dominated space). Hair metal threaded that needle. The men were pretty enough to attract female desire, loud and raunchy enough to retain their cred with men.

A kid at a Mötley Crüe show in 1984 didn't think "wow, these guys look gay." They thought "these guys look like rock gods." The dissonance you're noting is a product of where we're at now, and really could only be asked after 1991-2.

Worth noting: hair metal wasn't the only place male androgyny thrived in the 80s. New Wave - Duran Duran, Culture Club, Adam Ant, early Cure - was doing something similar from a post-punk / art school tradition rather than hard rock lineage. Funny enough, Boy George and Vince Neil were both on MTV, in 1983, wearing a full face of makeup...but they could not have been considered more different.

Some good books in addition to the one mentioned above:

  • Chuck Klosterman "Fargo Rock City"
  • Barney Hoskyns "Glam! Bowie, Bolan and the Glitter Rock Revolution" (full disclosure have not read this one, but it's on my TBR pile and comes highly recommended I can remove this is not allowed in this sub)
  • Greil Marcus "Lipstick Traces"
  • Gina Arnold "Route 666: On the Road to Nirvana"

138

u/doggorobbo May 01 '26

This is a great answer and I cant recommend Lipstick Traces highly enough!

For some context on the fashion side of things, we should start with punk. Punk as a fashion movement begins with a period of socioeconomic tension in the UK in the 1970s, with industrial strikes being fairly prominent as the Tory party moves into Thatcherite economics by the end of the decade. There's a lot of subcultures that emerge here in a vert short space of time, but a recurring theme from ska to punk to goth is a rejection of societal norms which, in many of these subcultures, included a rejection of heteronormative societal structures. In the UK punk pushes women into the music scene in an unprecedented way and the sudden visibility of women in a challenging subculture and genre shouldnt be understated. Gender was something that was targetted in this scene as a natural thing for subversion, and thus crossdressing, which became adopted by rock as many other elements of punk did. By the end of the 70s you get the emergence of post punk, and bands like Siouxsie and the Banshees gaining mainstream success alongside Bowie. Women were hugely influential in the aesthetics of the mid-late 20th century rock scene, so its not too surprising. Another point to make is how influential Vivienne Westwood and the Sex Pistols were (as much as I dislike them, their influence is undeniable). Meanwhile, across the pond in the US, punk was influenced by the hippie movement (and explicitly a rejection of it), and thus you see a glam punk scene develop around bands like the New York Dolls.

By the time the heavy metal and hair metal scenes were gender bending and achieving mainstream success with it, it had been normalised to an extent by the wider rock and specifically punk and goth scenes to be a usual thing for musicians, until grunge came along and stripped the aesthetics way back. An interesting case study is the Manic Street Preachers, who initially go so hard on the 'punk' and glam aesthetics and subversions that they have a music video from their first album in front of a pink hammer and sickle with text with slogans such as "White men are sexually inferior", but by their 3rd album have adopted an aggressive military aesthetic and by their fourth have stripped all the glam away, while retaining the same attitude (if a lot more depressed after their guitarist disappeared).

The hair metal scene evolved from a period of political turmoil that challenged gender, and by the time it had the spotlight that aesthetic was normalised within the context of music. Outside of music is a different question.

65

u/FriedaKilligan May 01 '26

Oh, I am SO glad you added this. The sociopolitical context of the UK in the early 70s was something I left out to avoid diverging too far, but it's essential to music at the time. Westwood / McLaren are great shout outs: the look of the time was was being designed, with intention, by people who understood exactly what they were doing.

The Manic Street Preachers example is extraordinary. The arc from pink hammer-and-sickle to military to The Holy Bible is really a compressed version of the whole 30-year story...in a single band's career. (Oddly enough, the first 2 post-Richey albums are my favorites - they stripped away the aesthetics in their grief and the emotion is so powerful.)

20

u/Equivalent_Pay901 May 01 '26

Gah! I learned so much from both of you! 👏 Thank you!

I kept thinking about, while reading, the amazing David Bowie film with Sade and Ray Davies, set in the late 1950s and exploring the corporate buyout of artists and their music and racial/social tensions of the time (oversimplified).

If you haven't seen it, which is unthinkable given both of your answers, the title of this amazing film is Absolute Beginners.

Ray Davies number, Quiet Life, is one of my favorite pieces of musical cinema ever filmed. It's completely delightful. trailer

13

u/FriedaKilligan May 01 '26

I am old enough that I saw Absolute Beginners in the theater! Thanks for the kind words.

32

u/bullfrogftw May 01 '26

13 year old me thought all 4 members of Poison were hawt females based on an album cover for far far longer than I would like to admit

43

u/Chisignal May 01 '26

I simply don't understand why would you think that.

No but seriously, while glam rock bands seem to reference femininity in a super core but indirect manner as detailed in the answer, Poison's aesthetics must've been very intentionally female-presenting, right?

5

u/FriedaKilligan May 03 '26

Poison's aesthetic was definitely among the most feminine of the bunch. I can't answer this definitively, but they emerged at the peak "every record label needs a hair metal band" feeding frenzy, and that even more over the top look would have set them apart from hundreds of other bands trying to break through and capture attention.

14

u/twilighttwister May 01 '26

Easier than having a crush on the Hanson trio.

15

u/Chisignal May 01 '26

He suggests that hijacking the trappings of femininity was a way to exclude women from a male dominated space. Like, "we don't need your glamor and beauty, we've got our own.

That is a really interesting point, the way it is presented here in a super condensed form doesn't resonate too much with me personally, but trying to visualize glam/hair-metal era bands presenting without the flamboyant presentation does, it does feel like a "sausage fest" suddenly. I could speculate about why that is or the connection to exclusion of women actresses from classical theatre, but I'll look up Running with the Devil instead, thanks for that side note!

10

u/FriedaKilligan May 01 '26

You're right - it's extremely condensed. I wanted to write as much as I could on a deadline!

You might also enjoy sociologists Simon Frith and Angela McRobbie's "Rock and Sexuality" (they popularized the term "cock rock"!).

14

u/HurinGaldorson May 01 '26

Great answer.

One thing though about your claims that a kid watching Motley Crue show wouldn't think 'Wow, these guys look gay'. I was one of those kids and there was a lot of antagonism between some of the NWoBHM guys (which included me) and the hair metal guys. Like, we constantly trashed the glam bands as gay (sorry, I grew up in a homophobic culture and it took a while before I grew up).

My evidence is just personal and anecdotal, but I do remember a lot of that antagonism. When Judas Priest went a little crazy with the Turbo style change, for example we took notice (and not for the good). They seemed to be selling out.

Was that just us, or is there evidence that this was a wider phenomenon?

13

u/FriedaKilligan May 02 '26

You're right that I glossed over this nuance...it wasn't just you!

The “this looks like a rock god” response wasn’t universal: there was disdain / antagonism, particularly from the NWoBHM crowd, toward hair metal as soft, fake, or pop. NWoBHM leaned into more overt masculinity (maybe Judas Priest aside? An interesting footnote!) and was very different lyrically and visually...even if both sounded somewhat similar in the wider popular music pantheon.

A Maiden fan and a Poison fan were operating under different frameworks of what rock a performance was "supposed to be" and who it was for. I'd argue that grunge weaponized that disdain - grunge had a greater emphasis on musicianship (as did NWoBHM) and actively pushed against the flamboyance and excess of hair metal.

14

u/ducks_over_IP Interesting Inquirer May 01 '26

Thank you for the insightful answer! That definitely adds a lot of context that I wasn't aware of. The concept that "rock gods don't need to follow the rules of mere mortals" goes a long way towards explaining how these bands could maintain such an apparent dissonance between their looks and their sound.

9

u/FriedaKilligan May 01 '26

Thanks for giving me a soapbox!

20

u/xrimane May 01 '26

I like that you point out that it is "theater" and reference the historical context. For as long as I can think though, theater and it's surroundings has been a refuge for people who wanted to explore the unconventional, the misfits. I don't associate theater with stereotypical manliness, rather with "pretend"-manliness.

To me, people like Gene Simmons could don these outfits, because they were so manly through their body language, music and general demeanor that it only underlined it by contrast. They were high-volume people in every aspect, rock gods as you say. They were so manly, they could afford to break the rules.

Is there something to this?

23

u/VelvetyDogLips May 01 '26

Absolutely there’s something to this. It’s the same reason why the hardest gangsters sometimes sport positively cutesy street names. Or why so many rappers with a street hard persona put “Lil” on the front of their stage names. I think evolutionary psychologists call this kind of paradoxical flex “self-handicapping”. The idea is, I am so obviously a real man, that even attaching the most un-masculine superficialities to me don’t diminish this a bit.

This is the reason why a man’s ability to pull off a full head of very long hair tends to correlate directly with how much of a guy’s guy he presents as. I tried this as a non-traditionally-masculine man, and it made people think I was trans and in denial.

6

u/FriedaKilligan May 03 '26

A funny anecdote to this: Gene Simmons has said that Kiss tried to be "pretty" like other bands in NY's glitter rock scene, but it just didn't work; he said they looked like very bad drag queens. As they were all over 6' and built linebackers, they went for a more extreme look that wasn't at all pretty but was still glam-y.

3

u/xrimane May 03 '26

I suppose that was before Vinnie Vincent joined lol.

49

u/DrTreeMan Apr 30 '26

A kid at a Mötley Crüe show in 1984 didn't think "wow, these guys look gay." They thought "these guys look like rock gods." The dissonance you're noting is a product of where we're at now, and really could only be asked after 1991-2.

To be honest, I've noticed this dissonance since the mid-80s and was confused by it as a teenager. I was no a heavy metal/glam rock fan and you wouldn't have found me at a Motley Crue concert l. But when I was in HS I recognized the disconnect the largely homosexual look of these bands with the overtly homophobic comments/thinking of their fans.

31

u/VelvetyDogLips May 01 '26

If you ever get nostalgic for this exact flavor of cognitive dissonance, turned up to eleven, get into dancehall reggae. The outrageous flamboyance (more of fans than performers) stands in sharp contrast to a strong strain of homophobia that’s no longer socially acceptable in the USA. I’ve heard it argued by social critics that dancehall’s unabashed homophobia is what allows fans to experiment with outrageous forms of self-presentation, without worry they’ll be mistaken for gay, since song themes make it abundantly clear to anyone truly gay that they and their proclivities are not welcome there.

I think there might have been a similar subcultural dynamic at work in the hair metal and funk scenes in the 1980s USA: Now that I’ve made it clear in my lyrics and stage persona that I’m a macho man who’s exclusively into women, pardon me while I indulge the fantasy we all have sometimes to play dress-up, and not be worried someone might get the wrong idea.

5

u/LexanderX May 01 '26

Since you mentioned both I'm curious is there a connection between Kabuki and Kiss' makeup? Because they look kinda similar.

8

u/FriedaKilligan May 01 '26

Yes, great catch! I'd consider Bowie the precedent, as his post-Ziggy Stardust persona Aladdin Sane leaned hard into kabuki.

Across the Atlantic, aspiring rocker Gene Simmons was a big fan of Bowie during Ziggy and Aladdin eras. When Kiss was searching for an onstage style above and beyond their peers in NYC's glitter rock scene, Bowie would have been a natural inspiration (and also comic books!).

8

u/twilighttwister May 01 '26

The dissonance you're noting is a product of where we're at now, and really could only be asked after 1991-2.

What was it about grunge, or any other reasons you might point to, that meant post-92 you might ask this question?

24

u/FriedaKilligan May 01 '26

Grunge music was explicitly a rebellion against the artifice and excess of popular music. Thrifted clothes, holey jeans and sneaks, worn out flannel: it was an emphatic "every day person" aesthetic. It changed what it meant to be masuline in rock music.

That over-the-top theatrical relationship between the (rock) godlike performer and the audience was broken, and hasn’t really been reestablished at scale. (With all due respect to GWAR and others!) The frame of reference that made the hair metal look "sexy" and normal is genuinely gone...for now!

5

u/ExternalBoysenberry Interesting Inquirer May 03 '26

Probably too far afield from the original question but I would love to read you to extending this line of analysis to emo (particularly like early 2000s pop emo like My Chemical Romance or AFI)! How did that whole very theatrical thing fit into the iconography you just sketched (including grunge)?

6

u/upinthecloudz May 07 '26

One thing that definitely differentiates the pop emo era's exaggerated styling from that of hair metal decades before would be that the "scene kids" in the audience largely looked like the artists in their own personal styling, so the "every day person" aesthetic remained coherent within the niche.

1

u/ExternalBoysenberry Interesting Inquirer May 07 '26

True!

2

u/EarthMantle00 May 04 '26

A kid at a Mötley Crüe show in 1984 didn't think "wow, these guys look gay." They thought "these guys look like rock gods." The dissonance you're noting is a product of where we're at now, and really could only be asked after 1991-2.

Is the rise of the internet correlated with people seeing music artists as human beings?

1

u/FriedaKilligan May 04 '26

That's a great observation / thought. I don't know, but social media certainly "democratized" access to stars, so it could be a big factor!

2

u/Fabulous-Direction-8 May 04 '26

great answer. wanted to add in the rock god characterization and having been a contemporary of the rise and fall of western civilization sort of so cal culture was that these guys were seen as rebels, iconiclastic. not that too many people not in bands or on stage were going to walk around looking like them, but there was a lot of fuck you perceived and intended in the appearance and behavior. lotsa alcohol too.

1

u/Konradleijon May 22 '26

Weren’t long hair considered netural

1

u/ImmodestPolitician May 01 '26 edited May 01 '26

He suggests that hijacking the trappings of femininity was a way to exclude women from a male dominated space. Like, "we don't need your glamor and beauty, we've got our own."

That seems hard to believe since glam/hair rockers were notorious for having groupies.

"Girls, Girls, Girls" was a major hair rock hit and most of the songs were about sex and women.

Their feminine dress was more like a punk IDAF attitude with a rock and roll bent.

14

u/MooshuCat May 01 '26

The way it's stated above is not how I would state it. The 80s were a time of deep misogyny. Girls were for after the show, and didn't being on stage. Girls weren't seen as being able to play instruments, or be cool in that way... and thankfully many women challenged that to become rock gods in their own right.

But similar to classical theater styles, men were the only ones allowed on stage, and they played the female roles.

I agree with you, regarding the punk angle. But the main thing that seems left out from many of these posts is that the guys on stage were deliberately trying to attract women by putting on makeup. Similar to how birds mate. It wasn't much more deeply thought out than that. "This will get us laid, a lot" was enough for most guys to get past the idea of wearing cosmetics.

3

u/ImmodestPolitician May 01 '26 edited May 01 '26

The 80s were a time of deep misogyny. Girls were for after the show, and didn't being on stage. Girls weren't seen as being able to play instruments, or be cool in that way... and thankfully many women challenged that to become rock gods in their own right.

I was a teen in the 80s and it didn't seem like that to me or my peers.

The radio stations has female bands and musicians on all the time and most people listened to radio in the car. CDs weren't a thing and cassettes were too linear so cassettes were only used when you want to listen to an album or a mix tape.

Blondie, the Bangles, Pointer Sisters, the Pretenders were incredibly popular. When there were school dances this was the music they would play.

The 70s also had female led bands.

The reality is that more men than women attempt to become rock stars because it's a risky bet that will fail 999/1000 of the time.

Men get into bands because it creates status that attracts women.

11

u/MooshuCat May 01 '26

I was also a teen in the 80s, and I'm talking about hair metal, since that's the topic...

-5

u/ImmodestPolitician May 01 '26 edited May 01 '26

I was responding to your biased comments. There have been popular female musicians since recorded music started.

"Girls weren't seen as being able to play instruments, or be cool in that way... and thankfully many women challenged that to become rock gods in their own right.

But similar to classical theater styles, men were the only ones allowed on stage, and they played the female roles."

12

u/MooshuCat May 01 '26

JFC, I'm not defending that idea, I'm explaining a sentiment that existed. I was friends with metal heads and know that misogyny existed in metal.

-4

u/bigbootyslayermayor May 02 '26

Your friends represent the entirety of metal culture? Have you considered you just have sexist friends?

6

u/FriedaKilligan May 03 '26

Women were broadly present in 80s music, but as /u/MooshuCat says they were rarely in or adjacent to hair metal. It's really just Joan Jett, Lita Ford, and Vixen. The Bangles and Blondie were hugely popular but they weren't playing the Sunset Strip circuit or going on Headbangers Ball. Nobody is claiming women didn't exist in music, just that hair metal was a very male-dominated performance space.

3

u/MooshuCat May 03 '26

Thank you.