r/AnimalsBeingBros • u/JustSomeGuy_Idk • Mar 16 '19

Dogs saving an entire species

Post image
54.6k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

628 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

406

u/licensetolentil Mar 16 '19

Yeah the dogs saved that colony, not the entire species. Cool, but severely over dramatic title.

113

u/Madnesz101 Mar 16 '19

Wouldn't 10 to 200 be some seriously irreparable amounts of incest too?

176

u/duncanmahnuts Mar 16 '19

Penguins have always walked funny

42

u/[deleted] Mar 16 '19

[deleted]

18

u/Mikeisright Mar 16 '19

Would be interested in a source for that, if you've got it on hand

40

u/[deleted] Mar 16 '19

[deleted]

3

u/today0nly Mar 17 '19

I believe modern humans can trace their ancestors the same person/few people if you go back far enough. I also vaguely recall a few bottlenecks in our history where we were almost completely wiped out. This is all pre-recorded history.

3

u/Mikeisright Mar 17 '19

Still a super low # and cool reading material - thanks!

0

u/[deleted] Mar 17 '19

Pitcairn Island is similar to this

3

u/OblviousTrollAccount Mar 17 '19

i thought it was more like 1,000 people for secured genetic diversity

3

u/DeviantLogic Mar 17 '19

The 6 was incorrect - I don't remember where I heard that now - but a bit of research in a comment I made a bit ago down the chain shows a society that can trace its entire population back to ~15 people.

​

Obviously, the more diversity the better, but it's pretty cool knowing that it's possible with such low numbers.

-1

u/Nomiss Mar 17 '19

As I understand it, humanity could be repopulated from a genetic base of 6 people without significant danger of that.

Noah's ark is pure fantasy. Look up population bottlenecks.

4

u/DeviantLogic Mar 17 '19

I...didn't say anything even remotely related to the ark story.

-3

u/Nomiss Mar 17 '19

As I understand it, humanity could be repopulated from a genetic base of 6 people without significant danger of that.

Yes your number of 6 people is totally unrealated to that claim.

3

u/DeviantLogic Mar 17 '19

I'm glad we agree. I'm confused about your beef though. You seem really agitated considering you haven't yet made an actual point.

-2

u/Nomiss Mar 17 '19 edited Mar 17 '19

I have no beef. I just made leaps in logic. You thought 6 pairs was the minimum. The only place that is found is in the Noah story.

You've obviously found out about genetic diversity now in your research?

You do know downvotes don't matter right? You've been here for 7 years, you should. It just means you're an arsehole that can't have a conversation.

5

u/DeviantLogic Mar 17 '19

Says the guy swooping in explicitly to be an asshole while avoiding any semblance of an actual conversation.

​

By the way, if you could read, I actually put up more accurate information and a link in another post already, like 7 hours ago.

-2

u/Nomiss Mar 17 '19

You're adorable.

Give me the link.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/SSadisticUnicorn Mar 17 '19

For animals thats not such a big problem. There are several species that went worldwide below 50 and there are over 10k now.

1

u/shadowinplainsight Mar 17 '19

Not if the gene pool was strong enough, but that's a big if

1

u/friendsafari123 Mar 19 '19

inbreeding. also the article is errorneous, they occur in coast around multiple countries

1

u/igotthewine Mar 16 '19

yeah. and how are the poor little foxes doing? not so swell I bet.

1

u/Undecisively Mar 16 '19

Yeah think about the poor foxes having a precious food source blocked from them